🚀 go-pugleaf

In <44h487$848@saba.info.ucla.edu> Dean Bethke
<dbethke@deans.medsch.ucla.edu> writes: 
>
>jpranger@Direct.CA (John Pranger) wrote:
>>In article <slworkDFCr9w.G4G@netcom.com>, slwork@netcom.com (Steve
Work) says:
>>>
>>>Jim Whitney (jwhitney@freenet.columbus.oh.us) wrote:
>>>
>>>: : I also have heard about the use of animals in the testing
>>>: : of gas-chambers.
>>>
>>>: : I think that there is a better way.
>>>
>>>:    Well, let's hear it...human testing. Don't criticize unless you
have a
>>>: solution.
>>>
>>>O.J. 
>>
>>Did you mean to put a question mark anywhere, asshole, or is human
testing 
>>your solution? 
>
>Actually, Johnny Cochran would be a good candidate!
>**********************************************************************
*******I suppose none of you have been in the military? When I was sent
to bootcamp 2 years ago(& they probubly still do this,) they had us go
in a room wearing gas masks and all...and they closed the doors and let
tear gas fill the room...our "gas masks" and all kept us alive...but
the pain was unbarable as they made us answer a question.Every cell of
your body burns.....just being in that room of gas made me wish I was
dead while I was in there...it hurt THAT bad.Don't tell me animals get
gased for our stupid destruction tools...and if your serious be rest
assured it won't go on w/o a price.And to you "men", please don't be
sarcastic about something you obviously never WENT THROUGH.
  nella@ix.netcom.com...yes, this was written by a WOMAN. Let me clear
it up for you...F-E-M-A-L-E
***********************************************************************
**