🚀 go-pugleaf

On Mon, 27 Oct 2003 16:17:31 GMT, ob110ob@att.net (Obwon) wrote:

>On Fri, 24 Oct 2003 23:33:28 -0600, Uncle Samuel
><stars@bars> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 25 Oct 2003 02:05:30 GMT, MiKe <gamma@nyc.rr.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Uncle Samuel wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> On Fri, 24 Oct 2003 20:18:51 GMT, MiKe <gamma@nyc.rr.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> >And the Neo-Cons try to wave all the bungling, mismanagement,
>>>> >irresponsibility, and DEATH by saying "Aren't we better off without
>>>> >Saddam in power?"
>>>> 
>>>> Ask the people he butchered.
>>>
>>>Ask the guy who armed him....
>> 
>>You leftist goon - that was to fight Iran, not slaughter his own
>>people and torture little girls!
>
> Ooooooo, "leftist goon"! 

Live with it you worthless POS!

> But please, just explain what
>evidence you have that proves that Saddam's use of the
>weapons we gave him, was disapproved of!  Did it even cause
>us to break relations with Saddam?  Or was this known
>activity ignored and therefore tacitly approved of?

Cite a year.

>>Btw - you as peeved at the Russians, Germans and French for being his
>>MAIN suppliers for the past decade?
>>
>>Idiot.
>
>  Well, obviously you've never been the leader of any
>soverign nation!  You are obviously unaware of international
>law!  As a Soverign leader Saddam had both the right and a
>need to buy arms from someone, if only to defend his regime,
>not to mention his nations soverignity.  Clue, that's one of
>the exact reasons we gave him arms, so that he could defend
>against Iran and not be taken over by them.

Clue the UNSC votes were bought off - moron.

>  Obviously, since we embargoed Iraq, they couldn't buy arms
>from us, so they turned to the international market and
>brought legal arms, not arms proscribed by international
>treaties or laws!  And certainly not wmd's!  

Wrong.

Read it and weep youleftist LIAR!

http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,886774,00.html
Two German businessman were yesterday convicted of supplying Iraq with
equipment for the manufacture of a gun capable of delivering weapons
of mass destruction. 
Bernd Schompeter, 59, was sentenced to five years and three months.
Willi Heinz Ribbeck, 53, received two years' probation for his part in
abetting a violation of Germany's arms export laws. 

The two men were links in a chain that delivered to Iraq drills that
can be used to bore the barrels for a long-range cannon capable of
firing nuclear, biological or chemical shells. 

Schompeter bought the drills from Ribbeck's then-employer, the
northern German machine tool company Burgsm�ller whose role in the
affair drew harsh words yesterday from the presiding judge. 

Reading out his verdict, Judge Michael Seidling said at least some
executives of the company were likely to have been aware of the deal.
"We believe that Ribbeck is not the only person at Burgsm�ller who
should have been in the dock," he said. 

The drills were shipped from Germany to Jordan. The importer was an
Iraqi-born US businessman, Sahib Abd al-Amir al-Haddad, whom German
prosecutors have identified as the deal's mastermind.