🚀 go-pugleaf

"alohacyberian" <alohacyberian@att.net> wrote in message
news:8qMUa.76219$0v4.5012374@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> "abracadabra" <abra@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:bfras7$750$1@slb4.atl.mindspring.net...
> > "alohacyberian" <alohacyberian@att.net> wrote in message
> > news:oc7Ua.70630$3o3.4746882@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> > > So Congress is not responsible for their actions?
> >
> > Uhm, your "president" is supposed to be the "leader"
> > While I believe that COngress mostly knew that Iraq was no threat, and
that
> > the war was pure politics, they were still given false information.
> >
> > But, the president who had
> > > the same information is responsible for his actions?  Nice try.  KM
> >
> > It's silly and ignorant of you to assume that the congress and the
> > "president" have access to the same levels of information. Certainly
> members
> > of the "intelligence" committee might have access to some of the same
level
> > of info
> >
> Touche.  The members of the Intelligence Committee voted unaminously for
the
> bill to invade Iraq that was authored by a Democrat who is presently
running
> for the presidential nomination.  And they're not responsible for their
> actions?  Only the president is responsible for his actions.  Tens of
> thousands of Iraqis thank their lucky stars daily for the actions of
George
> W. Bush, Tony Blair and the allied troops.  KM
> -- 


Did the Democrat know that the objections to various legislation had been
watered down? Some Republicans have argued that Bush was "out of the loop"
even though it was his staff doing the watering down. How much moreso would
congressmen and senators be?

-- 
New definition of irony:

'Today's liberal Democrats are like the supporters of the Third Reich of the
'30's and '40's
- they absolutely trusted the government to "make things right". '
-Comment made on the internet by an ardent GW Bush supporter.