🚀 go-pugleaf

"Uncle Samuel" <stars@bars> wrote in message
news:nr0rhvotbnif32cjd0pm37pc1nqm6k14un@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 22:21:16 -0700, "Lawson English"
> <english7@mindspring.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Uncle Samuel" <stars@bars> wrote in message
> >news:l8gphv4i6vkopkgokidf3411n3gedm1srg@4ax.com...
> >> On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 22:18:23 -0000, Gene <Yahoo@nowhere.com> wrote:
> >[...]
> >> >Joseph Wilson, a former US diplomat who went to investigate the issue
in
> >> >Niger concluded as much, saying that controls on Niger's uranium
mining
> >> >were far too strict for any deal with Iraq to be credible.
> >>
> >>
> >> And his expertise and biases are unimpeachable?
> >
> >Well, yeah, given that the Niger document *itself* turned out to be a
> >forgery. You're confusing at least two sources of info here: the forged
> >Niger document, which was the basis for thinking that *Niger* might be
> >involved, and some *other* document or other evidence, which the Brits
won't
> >show the CIA, which says that some other African country was dealing or
> >contemplating dealing with Saddam. Of course, we haven't seen that
document,
> >no-one outside the British PM and his intelligence agents has seen that
> >document, and we don't know ANYTHING about that document except that
Blair
> >is acting very nervous.
>
> Read the facts and get yer head straight.
>
> http://www.iraqwatch.org/wmd/

Thanks for the pointer to a dozen documents.

-- 
New definition of irony:

'Today's liberal Democrats are like the supporters of the Third Reich of the
'30's and '40's
- they absolutely trusted the government to "make things right". '
-Comment made on the internet by an ardent GW Bush supporter.