🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: talk.rumors
Article #777

Re: Lying Demos run a very misleading ad

#777
From: abracadabra
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 22:15
95 lines
4688 bytes
"Uncle Samuel" <stars@bars> wrote in message
news:mvvqhv4peq9i2vovjvjmu54cod9hpek8qm@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 22 Jul 2003 07:13:18 -0400, "abracadabra" <abra@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Uncle Samuel" <stars@bars> wrote in message
> >news:v6gphvsgl7kqjtug0l7t7s8oafpprvrvmb@4ax.com...
> >> On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 18:05:57 -0400, "abracadabra" <abra@hotmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >"alohacyberian" <alohacyberian@att.net> wrote in message
> >> >news:RoZSa.65597$3o3.4372381@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> >> >> "Uncle Samuel" <stars@bars> wrote in message
> >> >> news:lajohvcmg60ka57clhuclo2sdtiv5ghk4o@4ax.com...
> >> >> > On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 20:03:53 -0000, Gene <Yahoo@nowhere.com>
wrote:
> >> >> > >ac@keech.net (Auld Chiel) wrote in
> >news:114RP4nt50NF1r31219b@keech.net:
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > >So repeating a lie you know a lie as if it is true is somehow not
> >> >lying?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > He had no idea it was 'lie" you idjit!
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> It wasn't a lie.  The British and Italians are sticking by the
report
> >and
> >> >> though the French, who brokered the deal are remaining silent, they
> >> >haven't
> >> >> repudiated it.  KM
> >> >
> >> >Actually the Brits won't reveal where the information comes from.
> >> >The CIA says it's probably false.
> >> >Obviously there was no nuclear threat from Iraq, and Dubya lied
> >>
> >> Is that why the Israelis bombed his last nuke facilities?
> >
> >Do all things happen at the same time for you?
>
> No, they do form a trend line however you dolt!

Just wondering, as you're talking about things that are over 20 years out of
date. Maybe you're just real, real old, like Grandpa Simpson.

> > FOr most people we have
> >something called "the passage of time".
> >The Isrealis bombed the Iraqi facilities back in the early 1980's, some
20
> >years ago.
>
> And then later in the game...
>
> http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/iraq/facility/osiraq.htm
>
> After invading Kuwait, Iraq attempted to accelerate its program to
> develop a nuclear weapon by using radioactive fuel from the Osiraq
> reactor. It made a crash effort in September, 1990 to recover enriched
> fuel from this supposedly safe-guarded reactor, with the goal of
> produced a nuclear weapon by April, 1991. The program was only halted
> after Coalition air raid destroyed key facilities on 17 January 1991.

Still over 10 years ago.

> >We have been in Iraq for months, with 100K+ soldiers, and cound nothing.
>
> Duh, we haven't looked in Syria or Lebanon yet have we...

You advocating invading Syria, Iran, Lebanon, etc.?
And why the HELL would Saddam give his (non existant) nukes to his enemies?
Syria is no friend of Iraq, FFS.

> >There were no nuclear weapons.
>
> Functional ones...prolly not.
>
> Attempts to construct - certainly.

Or not. NO evidence.

> >Dubya lied.
>
> Did he?

Yep.

> Where did he say they actually had working nuke weapons?
>
> Come on, where?

CHeney said that Saddam was months from getting nukes. Dubya said that if we
didn't go to war NYC woiuld be nuked.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <bfkd30$e08$1@slb6.atl.mindspring.net>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newshub.sdsu.edu!elnk-nf2-pas!newsfeed.earthlink.net!stamper.news.pas.earthlink.net!stamper.news.atl.earthlink.net!harp.news.atl.earthlink.net!not-for-mail
References: <114RP4nt50NF1r31219b@keech.net> <Xns93BFA4863C7F5DoDahDoDah@216.168.3.44> <lajohvcmg60ka57clhuclo2sdtiv5ghk4o@4ax.com> <RoZSa.65597$3o3.4372381@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net> <bfho7s$5v0$1@slb5.atl.mindspring.net> <v6gphvsgl7kqjtug0l7t7s8oafpprvrvmb@4ax.com> <bfj68l$bmb$1@slb0.atl.mindspring.net> <mvvqhv4peq9i2vovjvjmu54cod9hpek8qm@4ax.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fb9af,5656df765424b120
X-Google-Attributes: gidfb9af,public
X-Google-Thread: 1026d8,a5a063547e3e570f
X-Google-Attributes: gid1026d8,public
X-Google-Thread: 106349,a5a063547e3e570f
X-Google-Attributes: gid106349,public
X-Google-Thread: 1141a2,8d264c919fcdcff8
X-Google-Attributes: gid1141a2,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-07-22 15:16:01 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newshub.sdsu.edu!elnk-nf2-pas!newsfeed.earthlink.net!stamper.news.pas.earthlink.net!stamper.news.atl.earthlink.net!harp.news.atl.earthlink.net!not-for-mail
From: "abracadabra" <abra@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: talk.rumors,co.politics,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics
Subject: Re: Lying Demos run a very misleading ad
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 18:15:51 -0400
Organization: MindSpring Enterprises
Lines: 99
Message-ID: <bfkd30$e08$1@slb6.atl.mindspring.net>
References: <114RP4nt50NF1r31219b@keech.net> <Xns93BFA4863C7F5DoDahDoDah@216.168.3.44> <lajohvcmg60ka57clhuclo2sdtiv5ghk4o@4ax.com> <RoZSa.65597$3o3.4372381@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net> <bfho7s$5v0$1@slb5.atl.mindspring.net> <v6gphvsgl7kqjtug0l7t7s8oafpprvrvmb@4ax.com> <bfj68l$bmb$1@slb0.atl.mindspring.net> <mvvqhv4peq9i2vovjvjmu54cod9hpek8qm@4ax.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: a5.f7.a1.a7
X-Server-Date: 22 Jul 2003 22:16:00 GMT
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000