🚀 go-pugleaf

"alohacyberian" <alohacyberian@att.net> wrote in message
news:c_7Ta.67272$0v4.4484224@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> "abracadabra" <abra@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:bfho7s$5v0$1@slb5.atl.mindspring.net...
> > "alohacyberian" <alohacyberian@att.net> wrote in message
> > news:RoZSa.65597$3o3.4372381@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> > > "Uncle Samuel" <stars@bars> wrote in message
> > > news:lajohvcmg60ka57clhuclo2sdtiv5ghk4o@4ax.com...
> > > > On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 20:03:53 -0000, Gene <Yahoo@nowhere.com> wrote:
> > > > >ac@keech.net (Auld Chiel) wrote in
> news:114RP4nt50NF1r31219b@keech.net:
> > > > >
> > > > >So repeating a lie you know a lie as if it is true is somehow not
> > lying?
> > > >
> > > > He had no idea it was 'lie" you idjit!
> > >
> > > It wasn't a lie.  The British and Italians are sticking by the report
and
> > > though the French, who brokered the deal are remaining silent, they
> > haven't
> > > repudiated it.  KM
> >
> > Actually the Brits won't reveal where the information comes from.
> > The CIA says it's probably false.
> > Obviously there was no nuclear threat from Iraq, and Dubya lied
> >
>
> Bush didn't say there was a nuclear threat from Iraq, he stated that
> according to British intelligence Iraq had sought Uranium from Niger.  The
> statement is true as it stands and you would have to be lying in order to
> claim it's a lie.

NOPE
Because Dubya knew the information was not true.
That makes it a lie.
Dubya lied.