🚀 go-pugleaf

Uncle Samuel <stars@bars> wrote in 
news:lajohvcmg60ka57clhuclo2sdtiv5ghk4o@4ax.com:

> On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 20:03:53 -0000, Gene <Yahoo@nowhere.com> wrote:
> 
>>ac@keech.net (Auld Chiel) wrote in news:114RP4nt50NF1r31219b@keech.net:
>>
>>> CNN
>>> 
>>> Democrats are launching a television ad that accuses President
>>> Bush of misleading Americans on the nuclear threat from Iraq.
>>> 
>>> The ad says: "In his State of the Union address, George W. Bush
>>> told us of an imminent threat. ... America took him at his word." 
>>> 
>>> The video shows Bush saying, "Saddam Hussein recently sought
>>> significant quantities of uranium from Africa."
>>> 
>>> The ad continues: "But now we find out it wasn't true.
>>> 
>>> Republicans claim the ad improperly quotes Bush because his 
>>> entire statement was: "The British government has learned
>>> that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of
>>> uranium from Africa."
>>> 
>>> from:
>>> http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/07/21/democrats.bush.ap/
>>> 
>>>             ============================
>>> 
>>> So the Democrats are lying by saying Bush lied because they
>>> want people to be upset about people lying, the opposite of
>>> their position for previous administration.
>>> 
>>> 
>>
>>So repeating a lie you know a lie as if it is true is somehow not 
lying? 
> 
> 
> He had no idea it was 'lie" you idjit!
> 
>>Amazing how unethical you folks are.
> 
> Pot/kettle!
> 
>> He wanted to say it against the 
>>advice of others and he did. 
> 
> BS, he listed numerous reasons.
> 
>>He did it for a reason - to hype a war. 
> 
> He did it to stem a threat, a very real one.
> 
>>Young Americans were killed in that war.
> 
> Yes they have been.
> 
>> His lying ways caused their 
>>deaths.
> 
> Did he lie when he said he wanted Soddem out?
> 
> Did he lie when he said the guy was teror sponsor?
> 
> Did he lie when he said the guy was trying to restart his weapons
> program?
> 
> Did he lie about the UN violations?
> 
> No, No, No.No.
> 
>> Easy, true, logical. 
> 
> Yes it is if liars like you would pay friggin' attention!
> 
> 
>>Liars like mushrooms need the dark. 
> 
> So you do.
> 
>>The flood lights are on and I can't 
>>wait to see how you folks explain the soon to be posted 9/11 report. 
The 
>>dam has to many hole to plug and the tidal wave is coming.
>  
> Go puss up a rope you liberal stink-brain.
> 

Let's see Your arguement is "No, No, No. No. Yes It is if liars like you 
would pay friggin' attention! So you do. Go puss up a rope you liberal 
stink-brain." So let's now factor the double negatives first.

No, No, No.No. = Yes.

And subtract the senseless. -(So you do.+Go puss up a rope you liberal 
stink-brain.+Yes it is if liars like you would pay friggin' attention)

So your argument is Yes!  Well I agree with your conclusion.
Next time I'd try to avoid all the typing and just type - Yes or I agree.