Thread View: tn.general
8 messages
8 total messages
Started by Vincent Breeding
Thu, 30 Jul 1998 00:00
Who Rules America? American Media Bias Exposed.
Author: Vincent Breeding
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1998 00:00
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1998 00:00
615 lines
34735 bytes
34735 bytes
WHO RULES AMERICA?
The Alien Grip on Our News and Entertainment Media Must Be Broken
By the Research Staff of National Vanguard Magazine, PO Box 330,
Hillsboro, West Virginia 24946 USA. FAX#
304-653-4690
http://ww.natall.com
There is no greater power in the world today than that wielded by the
manipulators of public opinion in America. No king or pope of old, no
conquering general or high priest ever disposed of a power even
remotely approaching that of the few dozen men who control America's
mass news and entertainment media.
Their power is not distant and impersonal; it reaches into every home
in America, and it works its will during nearly every waking hour. It
is the power which shapes and molds the mind of virtually every
citizen, young or old, rich or poor, simple or sophisticated.
The mass media form for us our image of the world and then tell us
what to think about that image. Essentially everything we know -- or
think we know -- about events outside our own neighborhood or circle
of acquaintances comes to us via our daily newspaper, our weekly news
magazine, our radio, or our television.
It is not just the heavy-handed suppression of certain news stories
from our newspapers or the blatant propagandizing of
history-distorting TV "docudramas" which characterizes the
opinion-manipulating techniques of the media masters. They
exercise both subtlety and thoroughness in their management of both
the news and the entertainment which they present to us.
For example, the way in which the news is covered: which items are
emphasized and which are played down, the reporter's choice of words,
tone of voice, and facial expressions; the wording of headlines; the
choice of illustrations -- all of these things subliminally and yet
profoundly affect the way in which we interpret what we see or hear.
On top of this, of course, the columnists and editors remove any
remaining doubt from our minds as to just what we are to
think about it all. Employing carefully developed psychological
techniques, they guide our thought and opinion so that we can
be in tune with the "in" crowd, the "beautiful people," the "smart
money." They let us know exactly what our attitudes should be
toward various types of people and behavior by placing those people or
that behavior in the context of a TV drama or situation comedy and
having the other TV characters react to them in the Politically
Correct way.
Molding American Minds
For example, a racially mixed couple will be respected, liked, and
socially sought after by other characters, as will a "take charge"
Black scholar or businessman, or a sensitive and talented homosexual,
or a poor but honest and hardworking illegal alien from Mexico. On the
other hand, a White racist -- that is, any racially conscious White
person who looks askance at miscegenation or at the rapidly darkening
racial situation in America -- is portrayed, at best, as a despicable
bigot who is reviled by the other characters, or, at worst, as a
dangerous psychopath who is fascinated by firearms and is a menace to
all law-abiding citizens. The White racist "gun nut," in fact, has
become a familiar stereotype on TV shows.
The average American, of whose daily life TV-watching takes such an
unhealthy portion, distinguishes between these fictional situations
and reality only with difficulty, if at all. He responds to the
televised actions, statements, and attitudes of TV actors
much as he does to his own peers in real life. For all too many
Americans the real world has been replaced by the false reality
of the TV environment, and it is to this false reality that his urge
to conform responds. Thus, when a TV scriptwriter expresses
approval of some ideas and actions through the TV characters for whom
he is writing, and disapproval of others, he exerts a powerful
pressure on millions of viewers toward conformity with his own views.
And as it is with TV entertainment, so it is also with the news,
whether televised or printed. The insidious thing about this form
of thought control is that even when we realize that entertainment or
news is biased, the media masters still are able to manipulate most of
us. This is because they not only slant what they present, but they
establish tacit boundaries and ground rules for the permissible
spectrum of opinion.
As an example, consider the media treatment of Middle East news. Some
editors or commentators are slavishly pro-Israel in their every
utterance, while others seem nearly neutral. No one, however, dares
suggest that the U.S. government is backing the wrong side in the
Arab-Jewish conflict and that it served Jewish interests rather than
American interests to send U.S. forces to cripple Iraq, Israel's
principal rival in the Middle East. Thus, a spectrum of permissible
opinion, from pro-Israel to nearly neutral, is established.
Another example is the media treatment of South Africa. Some
commentators seem almost dispassionate in reporting the news
of racial strife from that country, while in the voices of other
commentators there is open hatred of the White South Africans
and unrestrained admiration for the Blacks. All of the media spokesmen
without exception, however, take the Black side; they differ only in
the degree of their partisanship.
Because there are differences in degree, however, most Americans fail
to realize that they are being manipulated. Even the citizen who
complains about "managed news" falls into the trap of thinking that
because he is presented with an apparent spectrum of opinion he can
escape the thought controllers' influence by believing the editor or
commentator of his choice. It's a "heads I win, tails you lose"
situation. Every point on the permissible spectrum of public opinion
is acceptable to the media masters -- and no impermissible fact or
viewpoint is allowed any exposure at all, if they can prevent it.
The control of the opinion-molding media is monolithic. All of the
controlled media -- television, radio, newspapers, magazines, books,
motion pictures -- speak with a single voice, each reinforcing the
other. Despite the appearance of variety, there is no real dissent, no
alternative source of facts or ideas accessible to the great mass of
people which might allow them to form opinions at odds with those of
the media masters. They are presented with a single view of the world
-- a world in which every voice proclaims the equality of the races,
the inerrant nature of the Jewish "Holocaust" tale, the wickedness of
attempting to halt a flood of non-White aliens from pouring across our
borders, the danger of permitting citizens to keep and bear arms, the
moral equivalence of all sexual orientations, and the desirability of
a "pluralistic," cosmopolitan society rather than a homogeneous one.
It is a view of the world designed by the media masters to suit their
own ends -- and the pressure to conform to that view is overwhelming.
People adapt their opinions to it, vote in accord with it, and shape
their lives to fit it.
Television Broadcasting
And who are these all-powerful masters of the media?
For a partial answer, consider television broadcasting, which
undoubtedly has become the most powerful medium for
determining the way Americans think and behave.
Not counting certain specialized cable news systems, virtually all
national and international TV news broadcast in the United States is
gathered, filmed, edited, and put on the air by just three companies:
American Broadcasting Companies (ABC), Columbia Broadcasting System
(CBS), and National Broadcasting Company (NBC). Most televised
entertainment programs viewed by Americans are broadcast by the same
three networks. Each of these three has been under the absolute
control of a single man over a long enough period of time -- ranging
from 32 years to 55 years -- for him to staff the corporation at every
level with officers of his choosing and thus to place his imprint
finally, totally, and indelibly upon it.
In each case that man has been a Jew.
Until 1985, when ABC merged with Capital Cities Communications, Inc.,
a New York-based media conglomerate, the chairman of the board of
directors and chief executive officer (CEO) of the network was Leonard
Harry Goldenson, a Jew. He had headed the network since he became
president of the predecessor corporation, American
Broadcasting-Paramount Theaters, Inc., in 1953. (The name was changed
to American Broadcasting Companies, Inc., in 1965.) In an interview
published in the April 1, 1985, issue of Newsweek, Goldenson boasted,
"I built this company [ABC] from scratch."
Under the 1985 merger terms, Goldenson became chairman of the
executive committee of the new company, Capital Cities/ABC, Inc.
Although the chairman and CEO of Capital Cities now is Thomas Murphy,
a Gentile, he has made no move to replace the men at ABC who served
Goldenson, and the network retains its Jewish character today.
CBS was under the domination of William S. Paley for more than half a
century. The son of immigrant Jews from Russia, Paley left the family
cigar business in 1928, when he was 27, to buy United Independent
Broadcasters for $500,000. He renamed it Columbia Broadcasting System
and made himself president. He became chairman of the board in 1946
and held that post until his partial retirement in 1983.
When independent broadcaster Ted Turner, a Gentile, made a bid to buy
CBS in 1985, there was panic in media boardrooms across the nation.
Turner had made a fortune in advertising and then had built a
successful cable-TV news network, CNN. Although Turner employed a
number of Jews in key executive positions in CNN and had never taken
public positions contrary to Jewish interests, he is a man with a
large ego and a strong personality and was regarded by Paley and the
other Jews at CBS as uncontrollable: a loose cannon who might at some
time in the future turn against them. Furthermore, Jewish newsman
Daniel Schorr, who had worked for Turner, publicly charged that his
former boss held a personal dislike for Jews.
To block Turner's bid CBS executives invited billionaire Jewish
theater, hotel, insurance, and cigarette magnate Laurence Tisch
to launch a "friendly" takeover of the company, and since 1986 Tisch
has been the chairman and CEO of CBS, removing any threat of
non-Jewish influence there.
NBC was formerly a subsidiary of Radio Corporation of America (RCA),
which was controlled for 40 years, beginning in 1930, by David
Sarnoff, another Jewish immigrant from Russia. When Sarnoff died in
1970 his son Robert took over. In 1986 General Electric Co. merged
with RCA, and now NBC is a wholly owned subsidiary of General
Electric.
There has been no move by top G-E management to change the Jewish
"profile" of NBC or to replace key Jewish personnel. To the contrary,
new Jewish executives have been added: examples are Steve Friedman,
hired in May 1990 as executive producer of NBC Nightly News and
succeeded in January 1993 by Jeff Zuker.
Entertainment Industry
The extraordinary concentration of Jews in the TV industry certainly
explains much of the bias of television news. As important as the
control of television news programming is, however, television
entertainment is even more decisive in determining the way Americans
think. Tens of millions of Americans, especially younger ones, never
watch network TV news broadcasts, but instead keep their sets tuned to
the entertainment programs. And it is in the entertainment field that
Jews have maintained the firmest control.
The man in charge of the television entertainment division at CBS is
Jeff Sagansky. At ABC the entertainment division is run by two men:
Ted Harbert handles the business end of the division, and Stuart
Bloomberg is in charge of entertainment programming. Brandon Tartikoff
became president of NBC Entertainment in 1980 and held that post for a
decade, until he was promoted to chairman in 1990. When he left NBC in
July 1991 to take the post of chairman at Paramount Pictures the
new president of NBC Entertainment, Warren Littlefield, assumed
control.
Sagansky, Bloomberg, and Littlefield pick the programs their networks
will broadcast: the game shows, the interview shows, the situation
comedies, the historical "docudramas," the family series, the
adventure series, the specials. They tell the program developers what
they want to see in the programs. They veto anything they don't like.
They determine the slant each program will have. They decide just how
hard to push various propaganda themes in their network programming:
interracial marriage, homosexuality, feminism, gun control,
"Holocaust" re-enactments, the menace of "White extremism."
Only one in 36 U.S. citizens (2.8 per cent) is a Jew. But nearly all
of the men who shape young Americans' concept of reality, of good and
evil, of permissible and impermissible behavior are Jews. In
particular, Sagansky and Bloomberg are Jews. So is Tartikoff.
Littlefield is the only Gentile who has had a significant role in TV
entertainment programming in recent years. This Jewish control of the
American entertainment industry and its influence on the American
psyche goes far beyond television programming for the major networks;
it also includes virtually everything which comes out of Hollywood's
film studios. The May 1990 issue of American Film magazine listed the
top 10 (in terms of gross revenues in 1989) U.S. entertainment
companies and their CEOs and ranked them by size. They were, in
descending order, Time Warner Communications (Steven J. Ross), Walt
Disney Co. (Michael D. Eisner), NBC (Robert C. Wright), Paramount
Communications (Martin S. Davis), CBS (Laurence A. Tisch), 20th
Century Fox Film Corp. (Barry Diller), Columbia Pictures Entertainment
(Victor A. Kaufman), Viacom Inc. (Sumner Redstone), Capital Cities/ABC
(Thomas S. Murphy), and MCA Inc. (Lew Wasserman). Of the 10 top
entertainment CEOs listed above, eight -- Ross, Eisner, Davis, Tisch,
Diller, Kaufman, Redstone, and Wasserman -- are Jews. Only two of the
top-10 entertainment companies have Gentile CEOs -- NBC and Capital
Cities/ABC -- and one of those -- Capital Cities/ABC -- has a Jew in
charge of its entertainment division.
There have been a few personnel changes since the 1989 survey, of
course. When Japan's Sony Corporation of America bought Columbia
Pictures in October 1989, Victor Kaufman was replaced by Peter Guber,
also a Jew. Guber's overseer is Sony's vice-chairman Michael P.
Schulhof, who arranged the takeover; he is a Jew too. In 1991 MCA was
bought by Matsushita, one of Sony's Japanese rivals, but Wasserman
remains in his old post. As a general rule, the Japanese are motivated
solely by economic interests in their buying of American media, and
they leave the propaganda to the Jews. More often than not, in fact,
Jews are the brokers of such Japanese media buyouts. Just as Schulhof
handled the Sony takeover of Columbia, the Matsushita-MCA deal was
arranged by Jewish media magnate Michael Ovitz and Texas-Jewish
wheeler-dealer Robert Strauss, later appointed as George Bush's
ambassador to Moscow. Steven J. Ross died in December 1992, and now
the top post at Time Warner is held by CEO (and chairman) Gerald
Levin, also a Jew.
Barry Diller left Fox in February 1992. Rupert Murdoch, owner of News
Corporation, Fox's parent company, took a hand in the management of
Fox for a few months, but in November 1992 Peter Chernin, formerly
head of the Fox Entertainment division, moved up to the top job as
chairman of 20th Century Fox Films Corp. Chernin is a Jew. Under him,
as president of Fox Entertainment Group since November 1992, is Sandy
Grushow, also a Jew.
And Sumner Redstone (born Murray Rothstein) has gained much prominence
since 1989, as two of his Viacom subsidiaries, MTV and Nickelodeon,
have acquired larger and larger shares of the juvenile television
audience. Redstone, who actually owns 76 per cent of the shares of
Viacom ($3 billion), is the largest single purveyor of race-mixing
propaganda to White teenagers and sub-teens in America and Europe. MTV
pumps its racially mixed rock and rap videos into 210 million homes in
71 countries and is the dominant cultural influence on White teenagers
around the world. Nickelodeon has by far the largest share of the
four-to-11-year-old TV audience in America and also is expanding
rapidly into Europe; most of its shows do not yet display the blatant
degeneracy which is MTV's trademark, but Redstone is gradually nudging
the fare presented to his kiddie viewers toward the same poison
purveyed by MTV.
It is difficult to believe that such an overwhelming degree of control
of the entertainment industry by Jews came about without a deliberate,
concerted effort on their part.
Radio Broadcasting
The "big three" TV networks -- ABC, CBS, and NBC -- not only have a
virtual monopoly on commercial network television broadcasting in the
United States; they account for most of commercial network radio
broadcasting as well -- or they did until recently. For many years
their only significant competitor in the latter arena, Mutual
Broadcasting System (MBS), with 941 affiliated radio stations (but no
TV stations) across the country, was headed by Martin Rubenstein, a
Jew. In 1985 Norman J. Pattiz, also a Jew, took over MBS as chairman
and CEO. Two years later Pattiz, through his holding company, Westwood
One, Inc., bought the NBC Radio Network from General Electric. The MBS
and NBC stations together make Pattiz the number-two radio broadcaster
in the nation, behind only Capital Cities/ABC. The current MBS
vice-president in charge of news broadcasting, Ron Nessen, who
formerly held the position of White House press secretary under Gerald
Ford, is also a Jew.
Newspapers
After television, daily newspapers are the most influential mass
medium in America. Sixty-three million of them are sold (and
presumably read) each day. These millions are divided among some 1,640
different publications. One might conclude that the sheer number of
different newspapers across America would provide a safeguard against
minority control and distortion. Alas, such is not the case. There is
less independence, less competition, and much less representation of
majority interests than a casual observer would think.
Only 412 (25 per cent) of the 1,640 publications are independently
owned; the rest belong to multi-newspaper chains. Only 121 of the
total number have circulations of more than 100,000. Only a handful
are large enough to maintain independent reporting staffs outside
their own communities; the rest must depend on these few for all of
their national and international news.
In only 54 cities in America are there more than one daily newspaper,
and competition is frequently nominal even among them, as between
morning and afternoon editions under the same ownership. Examples of
this are the Huntsville, Alabama, morning News and afternoon Times;
the Birmingham, Alabama, morning Post Herald and afternoon News; the
Mobile, Alabama, morning Register and afternoon Press; the
Springfield, Massachusetts, morning Union, afternoon News, and
Sunday-only Republican; the Syracuse, New York, morning Post-Standard
and afternoon Herald-Journal -- all owned by the Jewish Newhouse
brothers through their holding company, Advance Publications.
The Newhouse media empire provides an example of more than the lack of
real competition among America's daily newspapers; it also illustrates
the insatiable appetite Jews have shown for all the organs of opinion
control on which they could fasten their grip. The Newhouses own 31
daily newspapers, including several large and important ones, such as
the Cleveland Plain Dealer, the Newark Star-Ledger, and the New
Orleans Times-Picayune; the nation's largest trade book publishing
conglomerate, Random House, with all its subsidiaries; Newhouse
Broadcasting, consisting of 12 television broadcasting stations and 87
cable-TV systems, including some of the country's largest cable
networks; the Sunday supplement Parade, with a circulation of more
than 22 million copies per week; some two dozen major magazines,
including the New Yorker, Vogue, Mademoiselle, Glamour, Vanity Fair,
Bride's, Gentlemen's Quarterly, Self, House & Garden, and all the
other magazines of the wholly owned Conde Nast group.
This Jewish media empire was founded by the late Samuel Newhouse, an
immigrant from Russia. When he died in 1979 at the age of 84, he
bequeathed media holdings worth an estimated $1.3 billion to his two
sons, Samuel and Donald. With a number of further acquisitions, the
net worth of Advance Publications has grown to more than $8 billion
today.
The gobbling up of so many newspapers by the Newhouse family was in
large degree made possible by the fact that newspapers are not
supported by their subscribers, but by their advertisers. It is
advertising revenue -- not the small change collected from a
newspaper's readers -- that largely pays the editor's salary and
yields the owner's profit.
Whenever the large advertisers in a city choose to favor one newspaper
over another with their business, the favored newspaper will flourish
while its competitor dies. Since the beginning of this century, when
Jewish mercantile power in America became a dominant economic force,
there has been a steady rise in the number of American newspapers in
Jewish hands, accompanied by a steady decline in the number of
competing Gentile newspapers -- primarily as a result of selective
advertising policies by Jewish merchants.
Furthermore, even those newspapers still under Gentile ownership and
management are so thoroughly dependent upon Jewish advertising revenue
that their editorial and news reporting policies are largely
constrained by Jewish likes and dislikes. It holds true in the
newspaper business as elsewhere that he who pays the piper calls the
tune.
Three Jewish Newspapers
The suppression of competition and the establishment of local
monopolies on the dissemination of news and opinion have
characterized the rise of Jewish control over America's newspapers.
The resulting ability of the Jews to use the press as an unopposed
instrument of Jewish policy could hardly be better illustrated than by
the examples of the nation's three most prestigious and influential
newspapers: the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, and the
Washington Post. These three, dominating America's financial and
political capitals, are the newspapers which set the trends and the
guidelines for nearly all the others. They are the ones which decide
what is news and what isn't, at the national and international levels.
They originate the news; the others merely copy it. And all three
newspapers are in Jewish hands.
The New York Times is the unofficial social, fashion, entertainment,
political, and cultural guide of the nation. It tells America's "smart
set" which books to buy and which films to see; which opinions are in
style at the moment; which politicians, educators, spiritual leaders,
artists, and businessmen are the real comers. And for a few decades in
the last century it was a genuinely American newspaper.
The New York Times was founded in 1851 by two Gentiles, Henry J.
Raymond and George Jones. After their deaths, it was purchased in 1896
from Jones's estate by a wealthy Jewish publisher, Adolph Ochs. His
great-grandson, Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, Jr., is the paper's current
publisher and CEO. The executive editor is Max Frankel, and the
managing editor is Joseph Lelyveld. Both are Jews.
The Sulzberger family also owns, through the New York Times Co., 33
other newspapers, including the Boston Globe, purchased in June 1993
for $1.1 billion; twelve magazines, including McCall's and Family
Circle with circulations of more than 5 million each; seven radio and
TV broadcasting stations; a cable-TV system; and three book publishing
companies. The New York Times News Service transmits news stories,
features, and photographs from the New York Times by wire to 506 other
newspapers, news agencies, and magazines. Of similar national
importance is the Washington Post, which, by establishing its "leaks"
throughout government agencies in Washington, has an inside track on
news involving the Federal government.
The Washington Post, like the New York Times, had a non-Jewish origin.
It was established in 1877 by Stilson Hutchins, purchased from him in
1905 by John R. McLean, and later inherited by Edward B. McLean. In
June 1933, however, at the height of the Great Depression, the
newspaper was forced into bankruptcy. It was purchased at a bankruptcy
auction by Eugene Meyer, a Jewish financier and former partner of the
infamous Bernard Baruch, industry czar in America during the First
World War.
The Washington Post is now run by Katherine Meyer Graham, Eugene
Meyer's daughter. She is the principal stockholder and the board
chairman of the Washington Post Co. In 1979 she appointed her son
Donald publisher of the paper. He now also holds the posts of
president and CEO of the Washington Post Co.
The Washington Post Co. has a number of other media holdings in
newspapers, television, and magazines, most notably the nation's
number-two weekly newsmagazine, Newsweek. The Wall Street Journal,
which sells 2.1 million copies each weekday, is the nation's
largest-circulation daily newspaper. It is owned by Dow Jones & Co.,
Inc., a New York corporation which also publishes 24 other daily
newspapers and the weekly financial tabloid Barron's, among other
things. The chairman and CEO of Dow Jones is Peter R. Kann, who is a
Jew. Kann also holds the posts of chairman and publisher of the Wall
Street Journal.
New York's other major newspapers are in no better hands than the New
York Times and the Wall Street Journal. In January 1993 the New York
Daily News was bought from the estate of the late Jewish media mogul
Robert Maxwell (born Ludvik Hoch) by Jewish real-estate developer
Mortimer B. Zuckerman. The Village Voice is the personal property of
Leonard Stern, the billionaire Jewish owner of the Hartz Mountain pet
supply firm. The New York Post, suffering from severe financial
problems, has been bouncing back and forth for a year among a
succession of especially sleazy Jewish billionaires -- Peter
Kalikow, Steven Hoffenberg, Abraham Hirshfeld -- and Australian
newspaper mogul Rupert Murdoch.
Other Mass Media
The story is pretty much the same for other media as it is for
television, radio, and newspapers. Consider, for example,
newsmagazines. There are only three of any note published in the
United States: Time, Newsweek, and U.S. News & World
Report.
Time, with a weekly circulation of 4.1 million, is published by a
subsidiary of Time Warner Communications, the new media conglomerate
formed by the 1989 merger of Time Inc. with Warner Communications. The
CEO of Time Warner Communications, as mentioned above, is Gerald
Levin, a Jew.
Newsweek, as mentioned above, is published by the Washington Post Co.,
under the Jewess Katherine Meyer Graham. Its weekly circulation is 3.2
million.
U.S. News & World Report, with a weekly circulation of 2.3 million, is
owned and published by the aforementioned Mortimer B. Zuckerman, who
also has taken the position of editor-in-chief of the magazine for
himself. Zuckerman also owns the Atlantic Monthly and New York's
tabloid newspaper, the Daily News.
Or consider books. There are literally thousands of publishers in the
United States, and among these thousands are many with little or no
direct Jewish control; there are some which actually dare to publish
books not approved by the Jewish Establishment. But all of the latter
publishers are very small, and their books seldom reach the great mass
of Americans who buy their reading material from drugstore news racks
or from the chain bookstores.
Among the giant publishing conglomerates, however, the situation is
quite kosher. Three of the six largest book publishers in the United
States, according to Publishers Weekly, are owned or controlled by
Jews. The three are first-place Random House (with its many
subsidiaries, including Crown Publishing Group), third-place Simon &
Schuster, and sixth-place Time Warner Trade Group (including Warner
Books and Little, Brown).
As pointed out above, the Newhouse family owns Random House, and
Gerald Levin is CEO of Time Warner Communications, of which Time
Warner Trade Group is a division. Simon & Schuster is a subsidiary of
Paramount Communications, Inc. (formerly Gulf and Western, Inc.), of
whom the chairman and CEO is Martin S. Davis, as already
noted.
Another publisher of special significance is Western Publishing.
Although it ranks only 13th in size among all U.S. publishers, it
ranks first among publishers of children's books, with more than 50
per cent of the market. Its chairman and CEO is Richard
Bernstein, a Jew.
Those are the facts of media control in America. Anyone willing to
spend a few hours in a large library looking into current editions of
yearbooks on the radio and television industries and into directories
of newspapers and magazines; into registers of corporations and their
officers, such as those published by Standard and Poors and by Dun and
Bradstreet; and into standard biographical reference works can verify
their accuracy. They are undeniable, and when confronted with them
Jewish spokesmen customarily will use evasive tactics. "Ted Turner
isn't a Jew!" they will announce triumphantly, as if that settled the
issue. If pressed further they will accuse the confronter of
"anti-Semitism" for even raising the subject. It is fear of this
accusation which keeps many persons silent who know the facts.
But we must not remain silent on this most important of issues! The
Jewish control of the American mass media is the single
most important fact of life, not just in America, but in the whole
world today. There is nothing -- plague, famine, economic
collapse, even nuclear war -- more dangerous to the future of our
people.
By permitting the Jews to control our news and entertainment media we
are doing more than merely giving them a decisive influence on our
political system and virtual control of our government; we also are
giving them control of the minds and souls of our children, whose
attitudes and ideas are shaped more by Jewish television and Jewish
films than by parents, schools, or any other influence.
The Jew-controlled entertainment media have taken the lead in
persuading a whole generation that homosexuality is a normal
and acceptable way of life; that there is nothing at all wrong with
White women dating or marrying Black men, or with White
men marrying Asiatic women; that all races are inherently equal in
ability and character -- except that the character of the
White race is suspect because of a history of oppressing other races;
and that any effort by Whites at racial self-preservation is
reprehensible.
Our Responsibility
We must oppose the further spreading of this poison among our people,
and we must break the power of those who are spreading it. It would be
intolerable for such power to be in the hands of any alien minority,
with values and interests different from our own. But to permit the
Jews, with their 3,000-year history of nation-wrecking, from ancient
Egypt to Russia, to hold such power over us is tantamount to race
suicide. Indeed, the fact that so many White Americans today are so
filled with a sense of racial guilt and self-hatred that they actively
seek the death of their own race is a deliberate consequence of Jewish
media control.
Once we have absorbed and understood the fact of Jewish media control,
it is our inescapable responsibility to do whatever is necessary to
break that control. We must shrink from nothing in combatting this
evil power which has fastened its deadly grip on our people and is
injecting its lethal poison into their minds and souls. If we fail to
destroy it, it certainly will destroy our race. Let us begin now to
acquire knowledge and take action toward this necessary end.
(Let me take these last few moments to urge you to get the book that
is sweeping like wildfire across America, and awakening the American
people to their peril. By educating Americans, by getting the truth -
the whole truth, not just a watered-down partial truth - into their
hands and hearts and minds, we can take back America and make her
great, strong, and beautiful once again. Write today for our radio
offer Number 4, which is our huge 217-page encyclopedic collection of
the best articles from our patriotic newspaper from over a twelve-year
period. Just send a contribution of $25 or more to National Vanguard
Books, Department R, PO Box 90, Hillsboro WV 24946 USA. Send whatever
you can to help this truth-telling program on the air, a minimum of
$25 and remember to ask for radio Offer Number 4.)
ICQ# 11596999
http://www.natall.com
http://www.natvan.com
I speak only for myself.
To Subscribe to American Dissident Voices weekly transcripts
(the printed version of our weekly radio program),
mail: ADVlist@ListServe.com which contains the word
subscribe as the subject of your message.
Re: Who Rules America? American Media Bias Exposed.
Author: Dani Richard
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1998 00:00
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1998 00:00
30 lines
1380 bytes
1380 bytes
Vincent Breeding wrote: > > WHO RULES AMERICA? > > The Alien Grip on Our News and Entertainment Media Must Be Broken > > By the Research Staff of National Vanguard Magazine, PO Box 330, > Hillsboro, West Virginia 24946 USA. FAX# > 304-653-4690 > <snip> The buracrats... Get real! Thirty years later, same old bull. You didn't mention homosexuals in the entertainment industry. You also forgot about intersexuals and/or transsexuals. I know of about 4 transsexual lawers in Atlanta. Yawn.... Been there, read those books, got paranoid, then grew up... Dani Richard Ex-fundmentalist Ex-Cobb Countian Ex-Bigot Ex-homophobe Ex-male
Re: Who Rules America? American Media Bias Exposed.
Author: Nicholas J. Slodki
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1998 00:00
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1998 00:00
36 lines
1561 bytes
1561 bytes
Agreed totally :D Nicholas Slodki Just male <s> Dani Richard wrote in message <35C08051.3152@capmed.com>... >Vincent Breeding wrote: >> >> WHO RULES AMERICA? >> >> The Alien Grip on Our News and Entertainment Media Must Be Broken >> >> By the Research Staff of National Vanguard Magazine, PO Box 330, >> Hillsboro, West Virginia 24946 USA. FAX# >> 304-653-4690 >> ><snip> > >The buracrats... Get real! > >Thirty years later, same old bull. > >You didn't mention homosexuals in the entertainment industry. You also >forgot about intersexuals and/or transsexuals. I know of about 4 >transsexual lawers in Atlanta. > >Yawn.... > >Been there, read those books, got paranoid, then grew up... > >Dani Richard >Ex-fundmentalist >Ex-Cobb Countian >Ex-Bigot >Ex-homophobe >Ex-male
Re: Who Rules America? American Media Bias Exposed.
Author: asumat
Date: Sat, 01 Aug 1998 00:00
Date: Sat, 01 Aug 1998 00:00
205 lines
12485 bytes
12485 bytes
ARE THE ROTHSCHILD BEHIND THE CONSPIRACY? By: Efraim Menashe Jerusalem, Israel--It isn't easy being a conspiracy researcher- let alone a Jewish conspiracy researcher- when so many Jews are involved in political intrigue and world domination. This is a fact any objective thinker must conclude- whether the researcher is a Jew or not. As a Jew, the decision is harder to accept. But I guess I am an objective thinker before I am a Jew, and for that reason I am prepared to publicly admit to all who are reading that indeed, there is a conspiracy to control and dominate the world, and that many, many Jews play, and have played a role, in that conspiracy. For this is not speculation, it is fact. The names are well known to all: Rothschild, Warburg, George Soros, Henry Kissinger, the Bronfmans, Jacob Shiff, Bernard Baruch, Judah Benjamin, etc. However, one must remember that included in the conspiracy are also the Rockefellers, J.P. Morgan, Cecil Rhodes, the British Royal Family, the Vatican, the French and Italian members of the "NWO planning committee." Most of the players in the NWO arena are not Jews, if all the members are included. The problem is that for some reason only the Rothschilds are associated with being behind the creation of "the Illuminati." All the conspiracy literature points the sole finger at this family for creating the Illuminati and causing revolutions in France, Russia, the US, the murder of Lincoln, the creation of the Federal Reserve, the crash of l929, the Bank of England, two World Wars: in fact, everything that supposedly happens in the NWO is carried out via "agents of Rothschild." It is quite amazing how every conspiracy researcher whether it is Tex Marrs, David Icke, Guradas, Ralph Epperson, Eustice Mullins, John Coleman, it doesn't matter from which perspective they came to understand the grand conspiracy, they all agree on one thing that is that the "Rothschilds who are behind everything." The Schiffs, the Warburgs, Bernard Baruch, are said to be "agents of Rothschilds" but this may only mean that no other higher chain of command has been identified. None of these so-called agents ever admitted to being an agent, nor do we really know if they were. The way the conspiracy is described in the revisionist view of history, it is just assumed that they are, as it is assumed that the Rothschilds are behind the creation of the Illuminati. I have yet to see any proof that this is the case. I am not suggesting that the Rothschilds are not players in the NWO, only that they are far from being the only ones and it has never been shown by any conspiracy researcher that they are indeed, "Chairmen of the Board." It is possible that the Rothschilds agreed to have all the blame placed on them so there would be an outlet for those observant people who discovered the conspiracy. The family appears to have accepted that they would be blamed for the conspiracy and this would cause an increase in anti-semitism. The Rothschilds may have gone along with this in order to gain more power in the circle of powerbrokers. It doesn't seem to occur to the the Rothschilds' accusers that the likelihood of so much power being accumulated by one family is infinitely remote. What is never asked is "What was so special about the policies of the Rothschilds?" So they lent money to kings. Couldn't other rich people do that? How come no king ever tried to kill one of them to get rid of his debt? There is no recorded event anywhere of any type of opposition to Rothschilds' evil practices. Why not? the Knights Templer made enemies and were defeated by their enemies. How come the Rothschilds had no enemies who took revenge? How is it possible that a family dynasty can attain such power and wealth and yet have no enemies? Another question which needs to be answered is: "Did the Rothschilds run the Illuminati on their own?" Did they alone create all the intrigue and figure out all the plots and carry out the plans to cause the revolutions and wars? The running of the conspiracy is so complex, it defies all logic to suggest that it can be managed by just only one family. They must have had promoters and advocates who were prepared to go along with them. Yet there isn't one recorded event of a rebellion by the people who were following them or any other powerbroker competing for the top spot. The so-called Rothschilds' agents, Schiff, Benjamin, Warburg, Baruch, all went along without any challenge Rothschilds' leadership. Why? Since when has such power entrenched in one family not met with opposition? If the conspiracy theory that the Rothschilds with the Illuminati created the French revolution is true, and that the War of 1812, the Civil War, murder of Abraham Lincoln, the Russian revolution, the Russian-Japan war were Rothschild inspired, how is it that hrough all of these years the family was able to keep themselves so completely hidden from the public and free of blame? Why are they so untouchable? Perhaps the near "supermen" status many conspiracy researchers give the Rothschilds needs to be reevaluated. It simply isn't possible for one family to be so powerful over a period of 200 years and for one family to control everything the way conspiracy researchers present it. I am prepared to buy that the Rothschilds from their beginnings are one of the world's lowest form of lifes and responsible for the death of hundreds of millions of people, Jews included. They may even be a devil worshipers. The entire family is a shame to the Jewish people. They have no love for the Jewish people and they have caused much hardship for their brethren. So they are criminals but they are just one powerful family out of many. Why are they being singled out as sitting on top of the heap? Who are all the others that we don't hear about? How could one family have become so powerful that even the Kings of Europe they were lending money to never tried to eliminate the debt by eliminating the moneylender? Certainly these heads of state had the means, militarily and in other ways, to handle the Rothschilds in order not to have to repay debts. However no proof exists anywhere to prove that the Rothschilds were behind the creation of the Illuminati. My point is that they may have been involved in the affair, but they aren't the sole architects of the conspiracy. Fellow conspiracy researchers: there is no Jewish conspiracy. There are plenty of Jews wrapped up in the quest for a NWO, but to ascribe the entire agenda to a small group of Jews, is plainly wrong. The anti-Semites like to point out "how powerful the Jews are", but are the Jews as a people so powerful or is a tiny group of Jews dominating the power? Are these Jews really the ones in charge of the entire agenda to enslave the world? Hardly. The notion that there is a cabal of Jews who sit together once a year and decide how to control the world, and they do this on behalf of some Jewish entity, or Israel, is what we are asked to believe. If such a cabal exists, and the anti-Semites say it has existed for centuries, then where is one recorded historical event of a group of Jews assembling to plan their control over the world? There is no proof anywhere showing that The Protocols of Zion was describing a group of Jews intent on dominating the world so they, the Jews, would be kings. Indeed the protocols was probably an accurate description of a group of people bent on world domination. There may have been some Jews sitting at the table. I believe that. I just don't believe that the majority were Jews. If not, then who are the others? Who sits at that table other than the selected Jewish powerbrokers? There are Jews involved in the conspiracy to subject the world to a one-world government, no question of that, yet none of them are representing any Jews other than themselves. We know the Jewish masses are wonderful, hardworking educated people. The select few who are rich and are powerbrokers are a disgrace and should be exposed. How Israel's leadership has been thoroughly compromised and corrupted by the international Jewish powerbrokers should also be exposed. Rich, powerful Jews abroad exploit Israel for the gain of the people they work for. If these truths were exposed at least the issue would be confronted and the wound could, at least, start to heal. Unlike the majority of Jews, I have no reason to respect people like George Soros or Edgar Bronfman. They don't represent anyone other than other powerbrokers. I offer no guilt for these people. They are gangsters and like all other gangsters, they need to be punished. It smears the entire Jewish people for these people to claim they are "Jewish leaders." I'm one Jew/Israeli who never voted for Bronfman and object to his involvement in Jewish affairs and Israeli diplomacy. Jews like Soros and Bronfman are a cancer in the body of the Jewish people and to the state of Israel. I'm all for exposing these criminals and letting them face justice. Perhaps that's the difference between me and the rest of my fellow Jews: I don't care if we "wash our dirty laundry in front of the goyim," we need to wash our dirty laundry in front of ourselves. That, fellow conspiracy researchers, is where I end my apologies. I don't believe there is a Jewish conspiracy or ever was. What happened was that many rich and unscrupulous Jews throughout the past 300 years were prepared to take the blame for the conspiracy in exchange for power and influence. They believed that a little exploitation of your fellow Jews wasn't such a high price to pay if it meant personal advancement. Edgar Bronfman and George Soros were the Baruchs and Warburgs of a generation ago. Nothing changes in the conspiracy. Jews play in the game today as they did then. However I am not sure they are in charge today anymore than they were then. Let's not forget that the Vatican, the French, German, and Italian families, and the existing Monarchies in Europe, are still major sources of political and economic power in the world. The Jews are just one player in a game with many players. The only difference is that the Jews and Israel ARE in the news and identifiable. Thus it's easy to point the finger at the Jews because they stand out due to their economic strength. The others remain hidden behind thrones and Churches and a European tradition of secrecy. The Jews are featured in the mainstream media while everything the Vatican and the others do are held in secret so names are not recognizable. No fellow researchers, the Jews don't control the NWO. This conclusion may not be accepted by the Spotlight crowd who are looking for the simple answer and to them, it is just to blame the Jews for world domination. This is what the non-Jewish NWO players have planned and executed as a cunning policy to keep their plan for a one-world government secret: When it is threatened with exposure, get a few stooges to "blame the Jews" then have a few other dupes point the finger at the stooges and scream "anti-Semite." While the Spotlight crowd may not be capable of realizing how they are being duped, I hope all other sincere conspiracy researchers begin to question their basic contention that "the Rothschilds are behind the conspiracy to dominate the world." While the Rothschilds may be members of the team, they are far from being a one-man show. -----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==----- http://www.dejanews.com/rg_mkgrp.xp Create Your Own Free Member Forum
Re: Who Rules America? American Media Bias Exposed.
Author: Dani Richard
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 1998 00:00
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 1998 00:00
9 lines
938 bytes
938 bytes
asumat@my-dejanews.com wrote: > > ARE THE ROTHSCHILD BEHIND THE CONSPIRACY? > By: Efraim Menashe > I have heard this one as well, <Yawn...> Dani Richard
Re: Who Rules America? American Media Bias Exposed.
Author: webprowler1963
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1998 00:00
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1998 00:00
26 lines
1813 bytes
1813 bytes
In article <35C5CCB1.3F9D@capmed.com>, richard@capmed.com wrote: > asumat@my-dejanews.com wrote: > > > > ARE THE ROTHSCHILD BEHIND THE CONSPIRACY? > > By: Efraim Menashe > > > > I have heard this one as well, <Yawn...> > > Dani Richard > Media bias can be taken for granted now that the truth about the Lewinsky matter has been exposed. For years, the media has been broadcasting on the credit "investigating the president". Now, the only thing that remains is "investigating the personal life of the prresident". Stay tuned, the greatest conspiracy ever is about to unfold. The media has a black eye and it is gearing up its wheels in effort to impeach the President of the United States. It doesn't get bigger than that -get the full scoop at: http://www.geocities.com/athens/ithaca/9066/ -----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==----- http://www.dejanews.com/rg_mkgrp.xp Create Your Own Free Member Forum
Re: Who Rules America? American Media Bias Exposed.
Author: Tommy Daniel
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1998 00:00
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1998 00:00
53 lines
2772 bytes
2772 bytes
webprowler1963@my-dejanews.com wrote: > In article <35C5CCB1.3F9D@capmed.com>, > richard@capmed.com wrote: > > asumat@my-dejanews.com wrote: > > > > > > ARE THE ROTHSCHILD BEHIND THE CONSPIRACY? > > > By: Efraim Menashe > > > > > > > I have heard this one as well, <Yawn...> > > > > Dani Richard > > > > Media bias can be taken for granted now that the truth about the Lewinsky > matter has been exposed. For years, the media has been broadcasting on the > credit "investigating the president". Now, the only thing that remains is > "investigating the personal life of the prresident". Stay tuned, the greatest > conspiracy ever is about to unfold. The media has a black eye and it is > gearing up its wheels in effort to impeach the President of the United > States. It doesn't get bigger than that -get the full scoop at: SOCIOPATH Antisocial personality: This pattern formerly referred to as �sociopathic�, includes those whose behavior is repetitively in conflict with social mores. Delinquent behavior is not the sole pattern, but is accompanied by impulsiveness, irresponsibility, either a low sense of guilt or guilt that appears only after an event, callousness towards others, and a superficiality of emotional involvement. Those people seem to have a keen capacity for rationalizing and explaining their behavior as a consequence of another�s. They also show little foresight. COPIED FROM THE MERCK MANUAL TWELFTH EDITION Read this and realize that Bill Clinton is Clinically unstable. We don't need a independent council, we need a independent psychiatric evaluation of the President!. > > > http://www.geocities.com/athens/ithaca/9066/ > > -----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==----- > http://www.dejanews.com/rg_mkgrp.xp Create Your Own Free Member Forum -- This is not meant to harass, threaten, intimidate, endorse or solicit anyone!!
Re: Who Rules America? American Media Bias Exposed.
Author: Highspeed
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1998 00:00
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1998 00:00
60 lines
3192 bytes
3192 bytes
Just when I was convinced that the news has taken on a sleaze perspective of news reporting to a new high. While listening to the news a child here's & ask his mother, what is oral sex? The news through these words around every day. Starr is a loose canon with no regard for the law as in when he took ML into a motel room for 8 Hr. with 9 FBI agents & would not let her call her lawyer. He is now under investigation himself. There will be many books written about this prosecutor. As for SOCIOPATH it should be used every time we talk about all politicians & especially REPUBLICANS. Tommy Daniel wrote in message <35DA4918.55AB34CB@att.net>... >> Media bias can be taken for granted now that the truth about the Lewinsky >> matter has been exposed. For years, the media has been broadcasting on the >> credit "investigating the president". Now, the only thing that remains is >> "investigating the personal life of the prresident". Stay tuned, the greatest >> conspiracy ever is about to unfold. The media has a black eye and it is >> gearing up its wheels in effort to impeach the President of the United >> States. It doesn't get bigger than that -get the full scoop at: > >SOCIOPATH > >Antisocial personality: This pattern formerly referred to as �sociopathic�, >includes those whose behavior is repetitively in conflict with social mores. >Delinquent behavior is not the sole pattern, but is accompanied by impulsiveness, >irresponsibility, either a low sense of guilt or guilt that appears only after an >event, callousness towards others, and a superficiality of emotional >involvement. Those people seem to have a keen capacity for rationalizing and >explaining their behavior as a consequence of another�s. They also show little >foresight. > >COPIED FROM THE MERCK MANUAL >TWELFTH EDITION >Read this and realize that Bill Clinton is Clinically unstable. We don't need a >independent council, we need a independent psychiatric evaluation of the >President!. > >> >> >> http://www.geocities.com/athens/ithaca/9066/ >> >> -----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==----- >> http://www.dejanews.com/rg_mkgrp.xp Create Your Own Free Member Forum > > > >-- >This is not meant to harass, threaten, intimidate, endorse or solicit anyone!! > >
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads