Article View: tor.forsale.computers
Article #6729Re: ULTINET Computers: Have anybody sued them?
From: zaratus
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 1997 00:00
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 1997 00:00
52 lines
3425 bytes
3425 bytes
> - Peter Halani of Ultinet > HAS threatened to sue me for libel if I don't stop posting the > truth about Ultinet! > > I have replaced the Ultinet with a Toshiba notebook. > The battery life is a couple of REAL hours, and the screen > display is several orders of magnitude brighter than the > Ultinet. > I did ocassionally use the Ultinet (to keep the battery alive), > but the serial port has failed, as has the internal modem. > What can you do with a computer that runs for twenty minutes > every four or five hours? > In my modemming I have received messages from others reporting > really uncouth treatment. In my visit to Ultinet's "new" > > > Believe me, this was no victory. The anger at being treated > this way dimishes your trust in others, alters your attitude, > > D. Doucet > Toronto, Canada > d_doucet@netcom.ca I work for an un-named warranty and service center for Toshiba, AST, and ACER notebooks. I have had a multitude of people come into our service center pleading with us to service their Ultinet notebooks (which are usually less than 3 months old and still covered by their warranty) because the store was unwilling or unable to service the notebook computer. They offer premium cash for us to do anything we can to correct their problems and we usually can't do much because of the proprietary nature or those machines. I feel for people that have invested large amounts of money into systems, hoping that the company will back them, only to find that after the payment is made, that the customer is on their own. This is the exact reason why I would never buy anything but a name brand notebook. I work around notebook computers every day and personally own an IBM thinkpad 760 because I feel that it offers the best technology level and customer service of any machine on the market. The one problem I did have turned out to be my own stupidity (after calling the support line, and having a tech dispatched to my home on a Saturday, correcting the problem without insulting me all within a 36 hours) because I didn't read the manual correctly. Sure I could have gotten the same specifications in a Hitachi, Daewoo, or even clone system for probably $1500.oo less, but I would never have the same level of professionalism and quality of hardware compared to the system I have, and every day I speak with a customer of a problematic clone, I thank myself for making the right decision to purchase a higher quality notebook. I think it boils down to "you get what you pay for".
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<33FE7E86.A990BADC@idirect.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<871844751.31876@dejanews.com> <33F78178.FBE30C9A@hotstar.net> <33f92e46.2344779@nntp.netcom.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fd7c4,da26fc149f8c94fa X-Google-Attributes: gidfd7c4,public X-Google-Thread: fb1ea,da26fc149f8c94fa X-Google-Attributes: gidfb1ea,public X-Google-Thread: 11474a,da26fc149f8c94fa X-Google-Attributes: gid11474a,public X-Google-Thread: 107518,da26fc149f8c94fa X-Google-Attributes: gid107518,public X-Google-Thread: fb994,bfc2a6cc2a5d2ccb X-Google-Attributes: gidfb994,public From: zaratus <zaratus@idirect.com> Subject: Re: ULTINET Computers: Have anybody sued them? Date: 1997/08/23 Message-ID: <33FE7E86.A990BADC@idirect.com> X-Deja-AN: 268220522 References: <871844751.31876@dejanews.com> <33F78178.FBE30C9A@hotstar.net> <33f92e46.2344779@nntp.netcom.ca> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Newsgroups: tor.forsale.computers,tor.forsale.misc,can.legal,misc.consumers,alt.consumers.experiences