🚀 go-pugleaf

Updated info on my criminal case:

Yesterday it was supposed to be my trial day. My trial was moved from
Courtroom 126 to the "J" Courtroom on the third floor of the Old City Hall
with another Judge without any explanation to me. I asked for an adjournment
of the trial as I found I had some technical difficulties in cross-examining
material evidences, and also my alleged victim Waterhouse was not present, so
were the two witnesses of U of T: John Baird and Margo Blight. The U of T
party sent some one else to represent them in court whom I had never known
before. I did not know how to deal with such a situation and if I should
cross-examine the replacement witness or not, and what is going to cause to
my case if I do my cross-examination like that. Now I'll have to go to
Courtroom 111 on Jan. 27 to set up another trial date.

Today, Jan. 5th, there is an article in a news paper the National Post about
my story, in the "Toronto" section. But this article does not accurately
reflect some of the most important facts of my side on the story. For
instance, it does not cite all the facts I presented about Waterhouse's
violations of the University's grading system and academic regulations,
omitting the fact that Waterhouse bypassed the Chair of the dept. for grade
reviewing, and falsely identified himself as my supervisor in his reference
letter;  and it only cites part of the academic dispute between me and
Waterhouse, omitting the fact that Waterhouse says Asians did not have the
concept of beauty in history, and the fact my challenge to his call to
establish a "racial/biological approach" to art history studies, etc.

 About my criminal case, it does not cite the evidences and arguments of my
side, such as: evidences I presented  indicate those "additional threats" are
fabricated by the U of T and OHRC witnesses, and Strojin had no any excuse to
breach the Commission's "confidentiality rule" because this rule is analogous
to the "solicitor and client confidentiality" privilege that can only be
breached if the solicitor witnesses an actual crime is being carried out or
planed. But Strojin clearly knew at that time that I "does not pose a real
threat to he vicitim" as the police recorded.

Please refer to the documents on my site for more info on my case.


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.