Article View: tor.uucp
Article #4Re: uucico w/v32bis vs zmodem w/v32bis
From: Geoffrey Welsh
Date: Mon, 07 Sep 1992 18:56
Date: Mon, 07 Sep 1992 18:56
28 lines
1654 bytes
1654 bytes
marc@r-node.gts.org (Marc Fournier - Sys Admin) writes:
> Hi Folks...
>
> Stupid question of the week...maybe even the year...but it
> has me curious :)
>
> Why do I get better speeds with zmodem using v.32bis on
> a Worldblazer then uucico?
ZMODEM is a streaming protocol. While it may incurr higher overhead than
some protocols (such as YMODEM-G), it does a good job of maintaining roughly
95% of maximum possible throughput on any given link - up to the machines'
maximum capabilities, of course.
Still, if you have protocol spoofing enabled on the WB (I believe that the
WB supports spoofing over V.32bis, does it not?), you should get close
figures.
If not, then what's happening is that the transmitting end sends 3 (or 7)
packets of 64 bytes long before the ACK for the first packet arrives, so the
transmitter shuts up... and throughput capability goes unused. This pause is
what ZMODEM circumvents.
Geoffrey Welsh, 7 Strath Humber Court, Islington, Ontario, M9A 4C8 Canada
geoff@zswamp.uucp, [xenitec.on.ca|m2xenix.psg.com]!zswamp!geoff (416)258-8467
Coincidentally, most people who fight for "fairness" would be
significantly better off under the system they call "fair"...
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<HTVqqB9w165w@zswamp.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!uunet.ca!xenitec!zswamp!geoffReferences:
<1992Sep01.011942.27875@r-node.gts.org>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!uunet.ca!xenitec!zswamp!geoff From: geoff@zswamp.UUCP (Geoffrey Welsh) Newsgroups: tor.uucp,ont.uucp,comp.dcom.modems,comp.unix.sysv386,comp.protocols.misc Subject: Re: uucico w/v32bis vs zmodem w/v32bis Message-ID: <HTVqqB9w165w@zswamp.UUCP> Date: Mon, 07 Sep 92 14:56:52 EDT References: <1992Sep01.011942.27875@r-node.gts.org> Organization: Izot's Swamp Lines: 28