Article View: torfree.general
Article #226Re: (AUP) Free-Net or Kangaroo Court?
From: Jim Butterfield
Date: Sat, 04 Jul 1998 00:00
Date: Sat, 04 Jul 1998 00:00
44 lines
2891 bytes
2891 bytes
bt351 (bt351@torfree.net) wrote: : jim. freebd discussion is privileged - ie. it is not to be : communicated. I don't understand. Are you suggesting that I have disclosed material from FreeBD, Geoff? I don't see FreeBD, and have no knowledge of what goes on there. Any responses I made are to material posted publicly on the newsgroups. Perhaps you should draw our attention to whatever material is there that you feel is "FreeBD secret". Then we can stop discussing it ... : rebuilding tfn in the image of compuserve only restricts : political ideology - Such a thing hadn't crossed my mind. But I do spend time on Compuserve and AOL forums, and I often find these moderated forums have more solid information than can be found on comparable unmoderated usenet groups. Similarly, the moderated download areas are almost completely free of copyright material or virus-infested programs. If you have a problem with moderated newsgroups, Geoff, this could be an interesting new thread .. but I don't see that it has much to do with the current AUP thread. : quirk's mention of principals was not at all grammaticly : incorrect. principals refers to those who voted for him (obvious in : the context given). Gosh, this puts a whole new light on things. You must recall how Dim Kleiner used to brag on these newsgroups about how he used to hang around the now-defunct fetish bar, Boots. I had this image of the principals of his former schools showing up with their canes and straps to discipline naughty boy Dim. I never for a moment thought it was grammatically incorrect. :-) : increasing liability of the freenet is a BIG error. The liability is there now. An AUP will have the effect of controlling it. --Jim
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<EvKLnF.LJF.0.queen@torfree.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<359ee5f7.5387101@news.alt.net> <6n8u5j$gus$2@news.interlog.com> <35981165.2F55@pacbell.net> <6n977j$s14$1@news.interlog.com> <EvCHKJ.C4B.0.hotlips@GTS.Net> <6n9r7f$mdr$2@news.interlog.com> <359a189e.1497720@news.alt.net> <359a5c72.403753@news.pathcom.com> <359a6b2a.38470456@news.alt.net> <6ng828$l3s$2@news.interlog.com> <359bc0f8.836564@news.alt.net> <359c4a13.3777027@news.pathcom.com> <EvJBCJ.7B9.0.sheppard@torfree.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1511e9,af8b91c1b67e9f45 X-Google-Attributes: gid1511e9,public X-Google-Thread: 10aaae,af8b91c1b67e9f45 X-Google-Attributes: gid10aaae,public X-Google-Thread: 103731,af8b91c1b67e9f45 X-Google-Attributes: gid103731,public X-Google-Thread: 10643c,af8b91c1b67e9f45 X-Google-Attributes: gid10643c,public From: fjb@torfree.net (Jim Butterfield) Subject: Re: (AUP) Free-Net or Kangaroo Court? Date: 1998/07/04 Message-ID: <EvKLnF.LJF.0.queen@torfree.net> X-Deja-AN: 368654425 References: <359ee5f7.5387101@news.alt.net> <6n8u5j$gus$2@news.interlog.com> <35981165.2F55@pacbell.net> <6n977j$s14$1@news.interlog.com> <EvCHKJ.C4B.0.hotlips@GTS.Net> <6n9r7f$mdr$2@news.interlog.com> <359a189e.1497720@news.alt.net> <359a5c72.403753@news.pathcom.com> <359a6b2a.38470456@news.alt.net> <6ng828$l3s$2@news.interlog.com> <359bc0f8.836564@news.alt.net> <359c4a13.3777027@news.pathcom.com> <EvJBCJ.7B9.0.sheppard@torfree.net> Organization: Toronto Free-Net Newsgroups: torfree.general,torfree.policy,tor.general,can.infohighway