🚀 go-pugleaf

Nathan Richards (bm782@torfree.net) wrote:
: Yuri Kuchinsky (yuku@mail.trends.ca) wrote:
: : Nathan Richards (bm782@torfree.net) wrote:

: : : 	You _are_ slave labour.  You're a volunteer, aren't you?

: : This is truly disgusting, Nathan. Associating with the known troublemaker
: : and paranoid ranter Nabil obviously gave you an opportunity to learn a
: : few tricks from him?

: 	He's no troublemaker when compared with the likes of Gies and co.

In case you hadn't noticed, Nathan, this is one of the readers of the 
groups outside TFN.  The people who you don't care if you intrude upon 
with these petty complaints of matters which have no relevance in the 
real world, nor the net outside TFN.  Since you keep bringing the posts 
back outside, I'll keep this set except for followups; maybe by showing 
someone here takes exception to your complete disdain for netiquette, TFN 
won't sink much lower than it has in the eyes of other net users.

Or is that your aim?  To refinforce the stereotype of TFN as a squabbling 
ground for people with both poor net _and_ social skills?

: : How dare you put down volunteers who are contributing to common good!? You

: 	I will do it if I feel like it.  And the fact that it's "the common 
: 	good" has yet to be proven.

You haven't proven that it is not the common good, either.  Your 
continued attacks of this nature, and you refusal to restrict posting to 
relevant newsgroups, certainly seems to argue against your good 
intentions.  For example, why so _many_ newsgroups outside TFN?  Why not 
just tor.general, given the geographic connection?  Or just 
can.infohighway, if its the community networking aspect you're trying to 
keep reference to?

: : are a pathetic troll who doesn't have ANYTHING positive to contribute
: : here. So get some medication or something if this will help you to refrain

: 	If you don't have anything nice to say, shut the hell up.

Obviously, you like to give advice you have no intention of keeping.  If 
you shut up, maybe we'll shut up too.

BTW, did you hear the news that defamation on the net is now being 
challenged in court to establish whether or not it truly is equivalent to 
publishing in any other medium?  It's a web site under suit in this case, 
but if they examine the issues in enough detail we may get spin-off 
reasoning affecting other aspects of the net.  (I should add that this is 
in Canada.)

Possibly all the more reason to take your own advice...

Ciao, Ken Smith <*>
cg591@torfree.net
--