🚀 go-pugleaf

0.queen@torfree.net> <32e60277.181031375@frackit.com> <E4HEH6.G8E.0.sheppard@torfree.net> <32e993a1.360430893@frackit.com>Organization: Toronto Free-Net
Distribution: 
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]

Dave Ratcliffe (dave@frackit.com) wrote:

: |	mr. ratcliffe.  had you not supported isley's predisposition for 
: |csmg'ing non regional postings to regional newsgroups (for whatever 
: |reason-beit inquiries for cheap eats or magnificent hotels), i'd have a 
: |different concept of your concern.

: Ahhh. Now I understand. I agree with what Jan was doing and you hate me for
: it. Poor baby. None of that has anything to do with your claim of my
: attitude towards freenets though. 

	ever since they changed the legislation there davey?

: |when you stated bluntly that 
: |alt.atl.freespeech would never be propogated by your server because it 
: |was YOURS, i could not help but wonder about those who actually paid for 
: |the acquisition of that server (yes-i'm certain your name is on the 
: |invoice, but what of those who actually paid for it through fees.).

: What difference? It's my server. Do you think you own a piece of every store
: you ever spent money in? If so I suggest you start exercising your
: "ownership" rights by telling the proprietors what they should be doing.
: Don't be too surprised when they laugh in your face. 

	but this is a dynamic. competitive market davey.  are we 
attempting to restrict it's demand by restricting it's propogation?  can 
you say cabal (TM) davey?  there is no cabal davey.  just local isps 
(like you) who have some odd predilection that if they restrict free 
speech, they will further their own ends.  davey, you are a rube.  a 
genuine sucker.

: |: |and usenet would be closely 
: |: |restricted to those using it as a vehicle for for profit promotion.
: |
: |: Really? Fascinating imagination you have. I have been consistantly AGAINST
: |: commercial posting on the net. Prove otherwise. 
: |
: |	very nice to see frackit.com has removed its "donation" page.  
: |did it not pay davey?  or was it that the net cops cmsg'd that crap 
: |despite the size of the "donation".

: There's that active imagination again. I've never had such a page on the
: web. You're losing your grip Geoffrey. And in public too. 

	yeah, you, scotty, jan and chris (self imposed editors of other series 
of heirarchies) are looking for profit by managing cmsgs.  scotts was 
blatant.  that someone should support his cmsg habit (as scott anguish 
has) by selling equipment illegal in canada (d star dishes) by 
"donations" from producers is absurd.  
	there is little doubt ferret (chris lewis) supports himself in a 
similar manner (making usenet palatable for the religious 
conservatives-who-self justified by their doctrine-go out and buy this 
illegal junk -no matter how freaky they get on saturday night)).

: |: Whatever are you talking about Geoffrey? The only postings I have ever
: |: canceled have been my own, and damn few of _them_. Can you say delusional 
: |: Geoffrey?
: |
: |	i'm very sorry there davey.  i forgot you prefer to use the 
: |resources of the "net cops" when you see something you don't like (i'll 
: |tke away your feed if i don't like you) net.inc.

: You're just full of imaginary conspiracies, aren't you. I have never asked
: anyone to remove anything for me. Again, prove otherwise. 

	no. lets just rig the vote to get a "regional heirarchy 
moderator" taking care of business for us.  in exchange they will punch 
adverts for their supporters down our throats.  

: |: Right Geoffrey. Exactly what web are you searching? Must be a different one
: |: than I use. 
: |
: |: I'm still trying to figure out what this all has to do with Quirk going
: |: off the deep end against Jim Butterfield. I'm sure in your mind there's
: |: a connection, as tenuous as it may be. 
: |
	this is a local pissing match.  your fomenting the match lends 
credence that you take exception to freenets.	

: Uh-oh... I hear Godwin approaching...

: |who doesn't like the idea of atlantans 
: |speaking with torontonians (or probably pennsylvanians), it seems ironic 
: |that same upper "yonker" should hold forth in newsgroups completely 
: |outside his geographical neighbourhood.  or is it that you are taking 
: |advantage of the historical tolerance of torontonians?

: Well now, if you'll take a moment and look up at the newsgroups line you'll
: find alt.usenet.kooks listed. That's where I'm reading this Geoffrey.
: Perhaps next time you'll be more observant before shooting off your mouth
: and makiing a public fool of yourself. 

	weren't you the asshole screaming trim the header?  so what will 
it be davey?  you are above your own rules?

: Oh, and as near as I can tell this thread appeared here in a.u.k. courtesy
: of Jim Butterfield (thanks Jim) in <E3sq72.LvK.0.queen@torfree.net> which
: is when I started following what was going on. Seeing as how both you and
: bOB are involved this is the perfect group for the thread. 

: |	or are you cruising to be crapped on?  c'mon davey.  if you 
: |respect the regional nature of newsgroups, what the ? are you doing here 
: |beside pulling your prick?  asshole!

: See above. And remember, the moral of the story is: "Crossposts will bite
: you in the ass every time if you don't watch out".

	the irony of the story is the editor is screaming edit your 
headers.  then screams "the regional nature shouldf be preserved at all 
cost". then screams "he can do as he pleases because he is an isp".  so 
what is it davey?  are you abvove your own rules?

: Now what was that you were saying about being "crapped on" Geoffrey? 


mange la merde, face de chein. Eh colisse de tabarnac mon chrise de englais. 
What th f-in are dou tawking about man. You`d be best careful ow yu tawk to 
da french man estis. One day we da french men of dis here countree will 
take over dis here countree and make evreebody take hockey lessons. You no ha
ha ha! Yessereeee hee heee heee! Well abowt dat fone a call a dhere.