🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: torfree.general
Article #624

Re: now@freenet.toronto.on.ca

#624
From: Jim Butterfield
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 1997 00:00
61 lines
3182 bytes
Quirk (dmytrik@lglobal.com) wrote:

: On Wed, 8 Jan 1997 15:02:22 GMT, Bob Allisat wrote:

: +  >From: now@freenet.toronto.on.ca

: +  >***** The BEST Way for YOU to Market Successfully *****

: +   Their use of a free public service
: +   for profit making is unacceptable
: +   in my humble opinion. Unless they
: +   are willing to pay major $$$s
: +   for the privilige.

: Has anybody done any header analysis to verify that this spam *IS*
: actually from the freenet?

Amazing though it may seem, only one person has reported receiving this 
message.  (What's the singular of spam?  spud?)

That person appears to be a beginner, who doesn't know about pressing 
Ctrl-h to get message headers.

The address is clearly a fake.  Try sending mail to it:  you'll get a 
response of:

>: From MAILER-DAEMON@torfree.net Thu Jan  9 07:11:25 1997
>: Date: Wed, 8 Jan 97 22:07 EST
>: From: MAILER-DAEMON@torfree.net
>: Subject: mail failed, returning to sender

>: |------------------------- Failed addresses follow: ------------------|
>:  <now@freenet.toronto.on.ca> ... unknown user

: I say that a TFN member should organise a members committee to take
: disciplinary action against abusers ...

An interesting thought.  What about abusers who post obscenity to 
inappropriate newsgroups?

: Go for it Bob.

Keep in mind that this transmission, and the one from Quirk, and the one 
from boB, and the one from now@torfree.net, just might be malicious 
forgeries.  boB may have invented all of it.

:            Copyright 1996 Idiosyntactix, Toronto.

Sorry, this mail took place in 1997.  Are you claiming copyright to the 
material ostensibly posted by now@torfree.net and reposted by yourself?  
And material posted by boB and reposted by yourself?  When do you plan to 
publish?  Interesting to see a copyright on public statements; now, if 
Jean Chretien had only put a copyright on the Red Book, the press would 
not be able to quote it back at him.

Do you open every board meeting with the statement, "Everything I say is 
copyright 1996 Idiosyntactix, Toronto .. it may not be reproduced in the 
minutes without written permission"?

Then again, the copyright just might be a malicious forgery.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <E3sq72.LvK.0.queen@torfree.net>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <E3p33y.92K.0.sheppard@torfree.net> <32d6f058.1476054@news.alt.net>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fc3d0,c2c487bc3e4058af
X-Google-Attributes: gidfc3d0,public
X-Google-Thread: fa47f,3ced0cd11f4fb941,start
X-Google-Attributes: gidfa47f,public
X-Google-Thread: 103731,c2c487bc3e4058af
X-Google-Attributes: gid103731,public
X-Google-Thread: 10643c,c2c487bc3e4058af
X-Google-Attributes: gid10643c,public
X-Google-Thread: 10aaae,c2c487bc3e4058af
X-Google-Attributes: gid10aaae,public
X-Google-Thread: 10f7a7,3ced0cd11f4fb941,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid10f7a7,public
From: fjb@torfree.net (Jim Butterfield)
Subject: Re: now@freenet.toronto.on.ca
Date: 1997/01/10
Message-ID: <E3sq72.LvK.0.queen@torfree.net>
X-Deja-AN: 208953779
references: <E3p33y.92K.0.sheppard@torfree.net> <32d6f058.1476054@news.alt.net>
organization: Toronto Free-Net
newsgroups: torfree.general,tor.general,ont.general,can.infohighway,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.allisat