Article View: torfree.general
Article #624Re: now@freenet.toronto.on.ca
From: Jim Butterfield
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 1997 00:00
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 1997 00:00
61 lines
3182 bytes
3182 bytes
Quirk (dmytrik@lglobal.com) wrote: : On Wed, 8 Jan 1997 15:02:22 GMT, Bob Allisat wrote: : + >From: now@freenet.toronto.on.ca : + >***** The BEST Way for YOU to Market Successfully ***** : + Their use of a free public service : + for profit making is unacceptable : + in my humble opinion. Unless they : + are willing to pay major $$$s : + for the privilige. : Has anybody done any header analysis to verify that this spam *IS* : actually from the freenet? Amazing though it may seem, only one person has reported receiving this message. (What's the singular of spam? spud?) That person appears to be a beginner, who doesn't know about pressing Ctrl-h to get message headers. The address is clearly a fake. Try sending mail to it: you'll get a response of: >: From MAILER-DAEMON@torfree.net Thu Jan 9 07:11:25 1997 >: Date: Wed, 8 Jan 97 22:07 EST >: From: MAILER-DAEMON@torfree.net >: Subject: mail failed, returning to sender >: |------------------------- Failed addresses follow: ------------------| >: <now@freenet.toronto.on.ca> ... unknown user : I say that a TFN member should organise a members committee to take : disciplinary action against abusers ... An interesting thought. What about abusers who post obscenity to inappropriate newsgroups? : Go for it Bob. Keep in mind that this transmission, and the one from Quirk, and the one from boB, and the one from now@torfree.net, just might be malicious forgeries. boB may have invented all of it. : Copyright 1996 Idiosyntactix, Toronto. Sorry, this mail took place in 1997. Are you claiming copyright to the material ostensibly posted by now@torfree.net and reposted by yourself? And material posted by boB and reposted by yourself? When do you plan to publish? Interesting to see a copyright on public statements; now, if Jean Chretien had only put a copyright on the Red Book, the press would not be able to quote it back at him. Do you open every board meeting with the statement, "Everything I say is copyright 1996 Idiosyntactix, Toronto .. it may not be reproduced in the minutes without written permission"? Then again, the copyright just might be a malicious forgery.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<E3sq72.LvK.0.queen@torfree.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<E3p33y.92K.0.sheppard@torfree.net> <32d6f058.1476054@news.alt.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fc3d0,c2c487bc3e4058af X-Google-Attributes: gidfc3d0,public X-Google-Thread: fa47f,3ced0cd11f4fb941,start X-Google-Attributes: gidfa47f,public X-Google-Thread: 103731,c2c487bc3e4058af X-Google-Attributes: gid103731,public X-Google-Thread: 10643c,c2c487bc3e4058af X-Google-Attributes: gid10643c,public X-Google-Thread: 10aaae,c2c487bc3e4058af X-Google-Attributes: gid10aaae,public X-Google-Thread: 10f7a7,3ced0cd11f4fb941,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10f7a7,public From: fjb@torfree.net (Jim Butterfield) Subject: Re: now@freenet.toronto.on.ca Date: 1997/01/10 Message-ID: <E3sq72.LvK.0.queen@torfree.net> X-Deja-AN: 208953779 references: <E3p33y.92K.0.sheppard@torfree.net> <32d6f058.1476054@news.alt.net> organization: Toronto Free-Net newsgroups: torfree.general,tor.general,ont.general,can.infohighway,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.allisat