🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <E43uEt.9I5.0.queen@torfree.net>,
Jim Butterfield <fjb@torfree.net> wrote:
>Quirk (dmytrik@lglobal.com) rejoices in the multiple newsgroups that 
>Allisat originated.  I usually chop them down to a few, but Q thinks 
>his words as SO important.  He wrote:
>
>: On Wed, 15 Jan 1997 14:44:54 GMT, Jim Butterfield wrote:
>
>: +  Poor Quirk.  Shirks his work, acts like a jerk.  This poem copyright 
>: +  1997 Jim Buttefield; it may not be reproduced without permission.
>
>Note that Quirk ignores copyright statements.  Which indicates how much 
>value you should attach to his:
>
>:            Copyright 1997 Idiosyntactix, Toronto.
>             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
>Wonder if he got the point?
>
>

Legal consensus is, when you post to usenet you
are implicitly giving permission to copy withing the
constraints of normal usenet operation. 

This includes copying your article onto every news server
on usenet and the resonable expectation exists that your
artiucle will be followed up with enought original material
to preserve context.

In other words you gave your permission when you hit
send.

You really havn't got a clue about this, do you ?


-- 
Richard Sexton
richard@alter.nic            We are all the Alter.NIC
richard@vrx.net