🚀 go-pugleaf

			<<  posted & mailed  >>

On Thu, 5 Dec 1996 04:40:58 GMT, Jim Butterfield wrote:
 
+  Interesting that Dmytri chose to ignore a designation of CONFIDENTIAL or 
+  the equivalent on the message he received.

Yup. I did it. I posted the results of the Election as soon as I got them.

Given the amount of bickering and misinformation in the newsgroups It was
the right thing to do.

Ed should have done it, but he chose not to -- the only given rational was
"no reason, just policy"

Ed has done and is doing a lot for the TFN and I didn't want to argue with
him and distract him from important work.

So... I put an end to the sillyness -- I posted the results.
  
+  Will he refuse to sign the declaration of non-disclosure that is required 
+  of board members?  Or will he just ignore it after signing?

Nope, what's with the red hearing Jim? I have worked on many big projects,
including government projects, I handle condifential data daily.
 
+  After all, he'll have a heluva nice mailing list - 30,000 names or so - 
+  to go out and sell to the highest bidder. 

I posted the election results so the membership would know.

It was the right thing to do. 

What does this have to do with selling anything?

Yet another specious insinuation from Jim, what's up Jim?

Jim usualy tries to be productive, even has prolonged streaks of apparant
sanity -- then all of a sudden makes a realy vile acusation.

Oh well, maybe he's got some nagging personal problems.

+  As you say, Graham, Dmytri 
+  chooses to ignore agreements of confidentiality.

Chooses: Plural. Meaning more than once.

Please site your evidence Jim.

Agreement: Meaning I have GIVEN agreement.

Please explain how I entered any agreement.

I ignored a request.

Given the circumstance it was the right thing to do.
  
           +++

           Dmytri Kleiner -- Quirk
                                        "Gravity lets
           P.S.  Oh, Nevermind.           you down"

    << http://www.lglobal.com/~dmytrik >>

               ** Keep in mind that this transmission
                  just might be a malicious forgery.

           Copyright 1996 Idiosyntactix, Toronto.