🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <3tm62g$24s@ixnews4.ix.netcom.com> hartmans@ix.netcom.com (Jack and Kay Hartman ) writes:
>From: hartmans@ix.netcom.com (Jack and Kay Hartman )
>Subject: Re: Dining Group WWW Site - Feeback To Inquiries
>Date: 8 Jul 1995 14:52:00 GMT

>In <jtbooker.5.2FFE088C@nando.net> jtbooker@nando.net (Jon) writes: 
>>SNIPPED

>I'm sorry, but I don't find this to be so rational.  How far to you
>allow this logic to go?  Do you allow a restaurant owner to refuse
>service to people because of their race?  Because of their religion? 
>Because of their gender?  Business owners cannot be allowed totally
>free reign.  Restrictive laws that offer protection to the general
>population are often in order.  I think that smoking is one of those
>cases.

>Kay
If you would bother to READ what I wrote, you will find NO mention of REFUSING 
service to ANYONE! I have merely stated the obvious: if it offends you--you 
are not forced to remain or patronize the establishment further. Like a 
movie--if you do not like the content, you are free to choose to leave and not 
come back. If you do not approve of alcohol, no one forces you to go into a 
liquor store--that is your choice. Think before you flame.
Jon