Article View: triangle.dining
Article #88Re: Dining Group WWW Site - Feeback To Inquiries
From: mark shaw
Date: Thu, 08 Jun 1995 00:00
Date: Thu, 08 Jun 1995 00:00
33 lines
2796 bytes
2796 bytes
Art Gorski (agorski@sam.neosoft.com) wrote: > In article <mshawD9qBJA.LEn@netcom.com>, mshaw@netcom.com (mark shaw) wrote: > > Good idea. How about a classification for cigar-friendly establishments as > > well? This would serve the double purpose of letting cigar smokers know where > > they would be welcome, and warning those who find cigars offensive away. > Yeah, unfortunately, most cigar-friendly restaurants require a tuxedo. ?? Not in my experience. As long as I stay in the bar, I haven't had any trouble anywhare in D/FW except at Medieval Inn -- and they're clueless when it comes to beer service anyway, so it was no great loss to bid them adieu. > I'd sure like to know about casual places where one could enjoy a fine > cigar. I note that you're in Houston, so I'm afraid I can't help you. As far as bars go, though, I understand that The Gingerman has a store in Houston as well, and they're *very* cigar-friendly in Dallas. Mark sez check it out.... > And forget about warning people away, there's not enough business > by cigar smokers to float a restaurant. I'd settle for a separate room, > or in the bar. But there are also plenty of nonsmokers who actually *enjoy* the smell of fine cigars, or don't much care one way or the other. -- Mark Shaw <mshaw@netcom.com> (no snappy sig as yet.)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<mshawD9u42n.Drt@netcom.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<3p56re$8jn@news.dgsys.com> <pete-2505951627120001@casual-casual.net5d.io.org> <mshawD9qBJA.LEn@netcom.com> <agorski-0706951841120001@scooter-ppp-a8.neosoft.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fb1d9,8f5e5a5228971cb8 X-Google-Attributes: gidfb1d9,public X-Google-Thread: fe8e7,8f5e5a5228971cb8 X-Google-Attributes: gidfe8e7,public X-Google-Thread: 110204,8f5e5a5228971cb8 X-Google-Attributes: gid110204,public X-Google-Thread: 111133,8f5e5a5228971cb8 X-Google-Attributes: gid111133,public X-Google-Thread: 10c1f9,8f5e5a5228971cb8 X-Google-Attributes: gid10c1f9,public X-Google-Thread: 10236d,8f5e5a5228971cb8 X-Google-Attributes: gid10236d,public X-Google-Thread: 115ce9,8f5e5a5228971cb8 X-Google-Attributes: gid115ce9,public X-Google-Thread: 10bf60,8f5e5a5228971cb8 X-Google-Attributes: gid10bf60,public From: mshaw@netcom.com (mark shaw) Subject: Re: Dining Group WWW Site - Feeback To Inquiries Date: 1995/06/08 Message-ID: <mshawD9u42n.Drt@netcom.com> X-Deja-AN: 103998297 sender: mshaw@netcom18.netcom.com references: <3p56re$8jn@news.dgsys.com> <pete-2505951627120001@casual-casual.net5d.io.org> <mshawD9qBJA.LEn@netcom.com> <agorski-0706951841120001@scooter-ppp-a8.neosoft.com> followup-to: triangle.dining,chi.eats,dfw.eats,houston.eats,la.eats,tor.eats,ba.food,ne.food,nyc.food,pgh.food,phl.food,rec.food.restaurants organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest) newsgroups: triangle.dining,chi.eats,dfw.eats,houston.eats,la.eats,tor.eats,ba.food,ne.food,nyc.food,pgh.food,phl.food,rec.food.restaurants