Article View: triangle.forsale
Article #1448Re: (fwd) Re: *** Warning to Briggman Buyers ***
From: Depoman
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 1995 00:00
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 1995 00:00
71 lines
3592 bytes
3592 bytes
In article <sasrer.819398957@sas.com>, sasrer@unx.sas.com says... > >>> Because you somehow felt that I was responsible for you dropping the >>> SIMMS I sold you, and then you felt compelled to post this, you may take >>> your SIMMS, and call Microtech and get your own replacements. >>> My schedule doesn't always conform to yours, however, I was still willing >>> to send your chips that YOU DROPPED back to the manufacturer at my expense. > >I came in a little late on this thread and didn't see the original posts, but from >what I gleaned from the articles I did read, the buyer dropped some SIMMs, later reported >them not working and the seller is not refunding the money (or making good some other >way) because he blamed the buyer for dropping the SIMMs. > >Is this an accurate assessment of the problem? > >I doubt very seriously that dropping a SIMM will break it in any way. The only way they >can be broken by dropping them is to have them dropped with such force to either break >the circuit board or to break a trace on the SIMM board - both of which can be easily >found with a magnifying glass. Given the light weight of a SIMM, the durability of them, >and a supposition that they were only dropped 3-4' (I assumed the person dropped them >to the floor while holding them, so I chose an average height of 3-4'), I believe the >probabily of the chips being damaged by the fall to be VERY LOW, and it is much higher >that the SIMMs were either damaged being removed from the working equipment, damaged >while installing them in the new equipment, or damaged by not taking proper ESD >precautions when handling the SIMMs. > >Note that I do not know either the buyer or the seller in this arrangement so I have >no vested interest. However, the buyer's contention that the SIMMs were damaged from >the fall just seems ludicrous at best. > >Of course, this is just my opinion... *smile* >-- >------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- >Rodney Radford, Senior Systems Developer, Advanced Visualization Division >sasrer@unx.sas.com SAS Institute, Inc, Cary, NC 27513 (919) 677-8000 x7703 >------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- Triangle PC Depot - (919) 544-1151 - Owned and Operated by Mark and Diane Bero. Located in Southeast Durham, NC, close to Research Triangle Park. Not a store, just a workshop. Custom-built, affordable PCs and upgrades. Uniquely different hours of service, 4pm-8pm M-F, 9am-5pm Sat. Call, E-mail, or fax for a quote to (919) 544-3485. Thanks for your time. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- I'm not sure what happened, but I bought stuff from him with no problem. He's an easy enough guy to get along with.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4b90ig$rna@castle.nando.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<199512191733.MAA08398@mercury.interpath.com> <Pine.SUN.3.91.951219123550.4072W-100000@jefferson.ee.duke.edu> <sasrer.819398957@sas.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10baf4,fc648a1397ae0218 X-Google-Attributes: gid10baf4,public X-Google-Thread: 10cf22,fc648a1397ae0218 X-Google-Attributes: gid10cf22,public From: depoman@nando.net (Depoman) Subject: Re: (fwd) Re: *** Warning to Briggman Buyers *** Date: 1995/12/20 Message-ID: <4b90ig$rna@castle.nando.net> X-Deja-AN: 122388303 references: <199512191733.MAA08398@mercury.interpath.com> <Pine.SUN.3.91.951219123550.4072W-100000@jefferson.ee.duke.edu> <sasrer.819398957@sas.com> organization: Triangle PC Depot mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: triangle.forsale,dc.forsale.computers