Article View: triangle.general
Article #1035Re: Why just "interviews" for those at Department of Justice regarding "Prosecutorgate"? What are they hiding?
From: Deadrat
Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2007 02:34
Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2007 02:34
29 lines
3119 bytes
3119 bytes
"Docky Wocky" <mrchuck@lst.net> wrote in news:SXhRh.4646$_43.3192@trnddc02: > Liberal geniuses cannot understand that in situations where, as > everyone knows, liberal investigators, Heh, heh. "Liberal investigators." Like Bob Barr, who spend hours of committee time investigating the Clintons' alleged misuse of the White House Christmas card list? One among many pseudo-scandals that came up with nothing, and every one of which had the full cooperation of Clinton administration officials. I'm sure you were right there decrying all the persecution going on then, weren't you? > who everyone also knows, are > simply on a fishing trip looking for anything at all to persecute > someone for, seldom consider that the object of their investigation > has the right to not play along with their fishing trip by demanding > his 5th Amendment right to not become a toy monkey dancing in the > moonlight for the entertainment, or edification of the persecutor > doing the persecution. In fact, the "objects" of the investigation have exactly one circumstance under which they may employ the 5th, and that's to prevent self- incrimination. The 5th amendment is not avialable to protect oneself from embarrassment or to protect one's cronies from exposure. When you're subpoenaed to dance in the moonlight because you've been a toy monkey for your corrupt bosses, put on the ballet slippers and get ready to to assume the positions. The 5th can't stop the investigators for showing the world what a monkey you've been.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<ZkiRh.1703$Q23.530@newssvr17.news.prodigy.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!newshub.stanford.edu!headwall.stanford.edu!newshub.sdsu.edu!newscon04.news.prodigy.net!prodigy.net!newsdst01.news.prodigy.net!prodigy.com!postmaster.news.prodigy.com!newssvr17.news.prodigy.net.POSTED!dc3fe8aa!not-for-mailReferences:
<1175797579.809642.192370@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <SXhRh.4646$_43.3192@trnddc02>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 101acf,3cb196f53425d0f X-Google-Thread: 108a25,3cb196f53425d0f X-Google-Thread: 105dfd,3cb196f53425d0f X-Google-Thread: 106998,3cb196f53425d0f X-Google-Thread: 1038e3,3cb196f53425d0f X-Google-Attributes: gid101acf,gid108a25,gid105dfd,gid106998,gid1038e3,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!newshub.stanford.edu!headwall.stanford.edu!newshub.sdsu.edu!newscon04.news.prodigy.net!prodigy.net!newsdst01.news.prodigy.net!prodigy.com!postmaster.news.prodigy.com!newssvr17.news.prodigy.net.POSTED!dc3fe8aa!not-for-mail Newsgroups: triangle.general,triangle.politics,dc.politics,alt.politics.usa,misc.legal Subject: Re: Why just "interviews" for those at Department of Justice regarding "Prosecutorgate"? What are they hiding? From: Deadrat <a@b.com> References: <1175797579.809642.192370@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <SXhRh.4646$_43.3192@trnddc02> Followup-To: misc.legal User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25 Lines: 31 Message-ID: <ZkiRh.1703$Q23.530@newssvr17.news.prodigy.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 76.203.7.234 X-Complaints-To: abuse@prodigy.net X-Trace: newssvr17.news.prodigy.net 1175826873 ST000 76.203.7.234 (Thu, 05 Apr 2007 22:34:33 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 22:34:33 EDT Organization: AT&T http://yahoo.sbc.com X-UserInfo1: [[PAPDCAOPRYRVXYWJJL_RDBUSXB@DTMNHWB_EYLJZ]BGIEL_NTKAH_[JTXDX_KI\VB]JBVMS^YT_G[CZVWAOS\DHFWEH]@KGXYHB\_CMDSFABP^J[AHHRKARLE_JDBLJ\XA[JRMEI]MGJSPB\Y]^KG\@S^@VQKI_Q[G@@_ACSARASDEFLBJ]S\GFNTUAVBL Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2007 02:34:33 GMT