Article View: triangle.general
Article #1143Re: Jon Benet....
From: Double-A
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 03:44
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 03:44
71 lines
4606 bytes
4606 bytes
Michael Baldwin, Bruce wrote: > dishonestjohn wrote: > > "Michael Baldwin, Bruce" <mbbr@mighty.co.za> wrote in message > > news:1156109022.376958.140370@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > > > dishonestjohn wrote: > > > > "Double-A" <double-aa@hush.ai> wrote in message > > > > news:1156054388.581481.96750@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > > > > > > > > > > Michael Baldwin, Bruce wrote: > > > > > > Dwenis Dwarfweener wrote: > > > > > > > I just spent a considerable amount of time scouring the internet > > for > > > > > > > images of her to try to understand why anyone would find anything > > > > > > > sexual in any pics of her. Others here have blamed Patsy Ramsey > > for > > > > > > > pimping out her daughter, so I needed to see what truth there was > > in > > > > > > > it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Google is there for you to do the legwork yourself. Can you find > > a > > > > > > > single (unaltered) pic of Jon Benet that in anyway portrays this > > poor > > > > > > > toddler as "sexy"? I can't. Go ahead, call me a normal > > heterosexual > > > > > > > male who likes women instead of girls, if that's your idea of an > > > > > > > insult. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But anyone who sees anything more than that in those > > > > > > > overly-done-makeup photos of her, and sees anything remotely > > sexual in > > > > > > > them is struggling with suppressing some latent pedo-desires of > > their > > > > > > > own. Is Burnore lurking in here under some other names or > > something? > > > > > > > > > > > > Yeah, pedo creep Gary gLitter Burnore would be all over her like a > > > > > > rash. I long suspected that he might have even been responsible. I > > > > > > doubt this new guy is. His facts are wrong. So there still might be > > > > > > room for Chester the molester. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You're safe, Bruce. > > > > > > > > > > Your sheep will vouch for you. > > > > > > > > > I suspected Colorado Carl for a while then discovered that he didn't > > like > > > > girls. > > > > > > You mean Davie Stephenson is ... queer? > > > > > Did Colorado Carl O. change his name to Davie S. ? Shit, now I'm going to > > have to start taking notes. > > Don't you recall my expose some time back where I discovered his real > name was Davis Stephenson? Poor Davie. He probably doesn't like to be > linked to Dickless Davie Tholen. Davis Stephenson is in jail. But this does raise an interesting point. Apparently Colorado law says that exposing someone's natural weaknesses to subject them to public ridicule, whether true or not, is a crime of criminal libel. Since Carl O. lives in Colorado and is subject to their law, I wonder if exposing someone as a kook (a kook nomination), is a jailable offense with which he might be charged? Double-A
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1156131865.787539.179310@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<613de2p8mhnd3cg2ds93glfmn0ge2lb3aj@4ax.com> <1156053538.609737.254490@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com> <1156054388.581481.96750@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <wpqdnWLK7-K973XZnZ2dnUVZ_o6dnZ2d@centurytel.net> <1156109022.376958.140370@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <3t-dndTZbpJFiHTZnZ2dnUVZ_q-dnZ2d@centurytel.net> <1156126713.903768.178300@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 101acf,e8a00fe4d7ff4217 X-Google-Thread: 100caf,32a9dcb3bed142c5 X-Google-Thread: 1156f6,32a9dcb3bed142c5 X-Google-Thread: fdc67,32a9dcb3bed142c5 X-Google-Thread: 1138ec,32a9dcb3bed142c5 X-Google-Attributes: gid101acf,gid100caf,gid1156f6,gidfdc67,gid1138ec,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: "Double-A" <double-aa@hush.ai> Newsgroups: triangle.general,ne.weather,demon.local,alt.astronomy,comp.os.os2.advocacy Subject: Re: Jon Benet.... Date: 20 Aug 2006 20:44:25 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 72 Message-ID: <1156131865.787539.179310@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> References: <613de2p8mhnd3cg2ds93glfmn0ge2lb3aj@4ax.com> <1156053538.609737.254490@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com> <1156054388.581481.96750@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <wpqdnWLK7-K973XZnZ2dnUVZ_o6dnZ2d@centurytel.net> <1156109022.376958.140370@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <3t-dndTZbpJFiHTZnZ2dnUVZ_q-dnZ2d@centurytel.net> <1156126713.903768.178300@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 4.255.51.33 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1156131871 8049 127.0.0.1 (21 Aug 2006 03:44:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 03:44:31 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <1156126713.903768.178300@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/0.2 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com; posting-host=4.255.51.33; posting-account=pb0cmQwAAABwaw9piurfof_6v4NySxNO