🚀 go-pugleaf

Tim Bruening wrote:
> Nightingale wrote:
>
> > "Tim Bruening" <tsbrueni@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote in message
> > news:447FF9E2.CB010784@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us...
> > >
> > >
> > > "Michael Baldwin, Bruce" wrote:
> > >
> > > > pedo creep Gary gLitter Burnore wrote:
> > > > > On Sat, 27 May 2006 16:16:04 GMT, "Rusty Shackleford"
> > > > > <nospam@bunnyhole_entertainment.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >In the Thursday May 25 N&O in the 'Local' section (B) a column
> > asserts that
> > > > > >a buyer was just about to close on a house when the real estate agent
> > > > > >received an anonymous call that the person living next door was a
> > registered
> > > > > >sex offender.  The information was verified on the NC website so it
> > was
> > > > > >true. Of course, that killed the deal but the buyer could have lost
> > the
> > > > > >$3000 earnest money deposit. The seller knew about the 'defect' but
> > did not
> > > > > >disclose it. It turns out the NC law does not require this
> > information to be
> > > > > >disclosed! Given that diclosure is mandatory for any other defect in
> > the
> > > > > >property that may affect its value such as airline noise, even bad
> > odors
> > > > > >from a sanitary landfill, why is this disclosure about something that
> > could
> > > > > >make it impossible to re-sell the property, exempt from the rules?
> > > > >
> > > > > A law would need to be crafted stating it a a defect.
> > > > >
> > > > > > Do other  states allow non-disclosure of regisered sex-offenders
> > near/around the
> > > > > >property intended for sale?  It also brings up the possibility of
> > lawsuits
> > > > > >against sex offenders who move into neighborhoods on the basis of
> > severely
> > > > > >depreciated home values.
> > > > >
> > > > > How about people known for breaking and entering?  How about people
> > > > > convicted of Murder?  Manslaughter?   If not, why not?
> > > >
> > > > Is that a sore point for you, pedo creep?
> > > >
> > > > <snip> Ooops! That's all there was!
> > >
> > > Where in God's name should we house sex offenders who have completed their
> > sentences?
> > >
> >
> > Australia?
>
> Australia already has people and an independent government.

What about Alaska?