🚀 go-pugleaf

"Art Deco" <art_deco@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
news:966o729u6tpvouvhujpabdjh7u9qprbsea@4ax.com...
> On 29 May 2006 22:15:19 -0700, "Michael Baldwin, Bruce"
> <mbbr@mighty.co.za> wrote:
>
> >Carl Osterwald AKA Art Deco wrote:
> >> On 29 May 2006 17:24:45 -0700, "Michael Baldwin, Bruce"
> >> <mbbr@mighty.co.za> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Carl Osterwald AKA Art Deco wrote:
> >> >> On Sun, 28 May 2006 20:42:21 -0500, "honestjohn"
> >> >> <honestjohn@centurytel.net> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >"Art Deco" <art_deco@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
> >> >> >news:0k4j72p0sptt2fp0mp8cqlogb0pg19lerf@4ax.com...
> >> >> >> On 27 May 2006 16:24:22 -0700, "Michael Baldwin, Bruce"
> >> >> >> <mbbr@mighty.co.za> wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >Carl Osterwald AKA Art Deco wrote:
> >> >> >> >> On 27 May 2006 11:57:42 -0700, "Michael Baldwin, Bruce"
> >> >> >> >> <mbbr@mighty.co.za> wrote:
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >Carl Osterwald AKA Art Deco wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> On 26 May 2006 20:06:08 -0700, "Michael Baldwin, Bruce"
> >> >> >> >> >> <mbbr@mighty.co.za> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >pedo creep Gary gLitter Burnore wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 26 May 2006 16:04:32 -0700, SpeakFreely877@aol.com
wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >Let's see how many of the "Ottawa Three" misspell[SLAP]
> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> I'm a poor little pedo.  I just can't win.
> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >> >You said it, pedo creep.
> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >> ><snip> Ooops! That's all there was!
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> Didn't cypherpunk@nyc.rr.com have a "thing" about him,
Bruce?
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >I think pedo creep, Gary gLitter Brunore, had a hardon for
him. Or was
> >> >> >> >> >it vice versa?
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >I can't remem
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> What was the question ag
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >Wha
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> W
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >~
> >> >>
> >> >> We all seem to be having a bad attack of atte
> >> >
> >> >A bad attack of the wha
> >>
> >> Yes, a bad att
> >
> >Yes, but wh
>
> I think you'r
>
Wha..