🚀 go-pugleaf

On Sun, 28 May 2006 20:50:28 -0400, Gary L. Burnore
<gburnore@databasix.com> wrote:

>On Sun, 28 May 2006 20:35:17 -0400, Rackles Shitsorferd
><massive@penesisisNOSPAM.com> wrote:
>
>>On 28 May 2006 16:58:48 -0700, "Michael Baldwin, Bruce"
>><mbbr@mighty.co.za> wrote:
>>
>>>pedo creep Gary gLitter Burnore wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 27 May 2006 16:16:04 GMT, "Rusty Shackleford"
>>>> <nospam@bunnyhole_entertainment.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >In the Thursday May 25 N&O in the 'Local' section (B) a column asserts that
>>>> >a buyer was just about to close on a house when the real estate agent
>>>> >received an anonymous call that the person living next door was a registered
>>>> >sex offender.  The information was verified on the NC website so it was
>>>> >true. Of course, that killed the deal but the buyer could have lost the
>>>> >$3000 earnest money deposit. The seller knew about the 'defect' but did not
>>>> >disclose it. It turns out the NC law does not require this information to be
>>>> >disclosed! Given that diclosure is mandatory for any other defect in the
>>>> >property that may affect its value such as airline noise, even bad odors
>>>> >from a sanitary landfill, why is this disclosure about something that could
>>>> >make it impossible to re-sell the property, exempt from the rules?
>>>>
>>>> A law would need to be crafted stating it a a defect.
>>>>
>>>> > Do other  states allow non-disclosure of regisered sex-offenders near/around the
>>>> >property intended for sale?  It also brings up the possibility of lawsuits
>>>> >against sex offenders who move into neighborhoods on the basis of severely
>>>> >depreciated home values.
>>>>
>>>> How about people known for breaking and entering?  How about people
>>>> convicted of Murder?  Manslaughter?   If not, why not?
>>>
>>>Is that a sore point for you, pedo creep?
>>>
>>><snip> Ooops! That's all there was!
>>
>>Yes, we apparently pushed the right button on that one. 
>
>Noting you and he couldn't answer a simple question, I think it's
>laughable that you think it pushed a button.
>
>
>>It somehow bothers Gary to know that regardless of how he is categorized in NC,
>>he is still a sex offender
>
>It does?  Heh. Funny, no one told me that.  
>
>> which means that regardless of where he lives from this day forward, all real estate within one mile of him
>>will immediately drop in value, anyone who does business with him will
>>find their reputation in decline,  and ultimately little old ladies
>>will yearn to spit on his haircut.
>
>Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.  Dumbass.
>
>>
>>Sorry but that's just a fact of life.
>
>Only in your feeble little mind.  In the real world, I'm doing just
>fine and it pisses you off. :)
>
>> It has not yet occurred to him that the only way to change this fact 
>
>It's not a fact so nothing heeds changing.
>
>>is spend the rest of his life being a nice person (as opposed to a NG trolling self 
>>appointed net cop) and then convincing everyone around him that he is a changed man.
>
>Unlike you, I'm not trying to convince anyone of anything.  But do
>dream on, I like a good laugh at your expense.

Thanks for publicly demonstrating that nobody pushed your buttons,
pedoman.  Your responses, or lack therof, will ultimately demonstrate
whether or not you care.

Oh wait, let me take a moment to quote you

" >Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha"

The simple fact you put so much emotion into your response
demonstrates to the group that you could not, for a moment, care less
that everyone in society unanimously hates you for the lecherous old
troll that you are.  Thanks for sharing :)