🚀 go-pugleaf

pedo creep Gary gLitter Burnore wrote:
> On Sun, 28 May 2006 23:12:38 -0400, Rackles Shitsorferd
> <massive@penesisisNOSPAM.com> wrote:
>
> >On Sun, 28 May 2006 20:50:28 -0400, Gary L. Burnore
> ><gburnore@databasix.com> wrote:
> >
> >>On Sun, 28 May 2006 20:35:17 -0400, Rackles Shitsorferd
> >><massive@penesisisNOSPAM.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>On 28 May 2006 16:58:48 -0700, "Michael Baldwin, Bruce"
> >>><mbbr@mighty.co.za> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>pedo creep Gary gLitter Burnore wrote:
> >>>>> On Sat, 27 May 2006 16:16:04 GMT, "Rusty Shackleford"
> >>>>> <nospam@bunnyhole_entertainment.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> >In the Thursday May 25 N&O in the 'Local' section (B) a column asserts that
> >>>>> >a buyer was just about to close on a house when the real estate agent
> >>>>> >received an anonymous call that the person living next door was a registered
> >>>>> >sex offender.  The information was verified on the NC website so it was
> >>>>> >true. Of course, that killed the deal but the buyer could have lost the
> >>>>> >$3000 earnest money deposit. The seller knew about the 'defect' but did not
> >>>>> >disclose it. It turns out the NC law does not require this information to be
> >>>>> >disclosed! Given that diclosure is mandatory for any other defect in the
> >>>>> >property that may affect its value such as airline noise, even bad odors
> >>>>> >from a sanitary landfill, why is this disclosure about something that could
> >>>>> >make it impossible to re-sell the property, exempt from the rules?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> A law would need to be crafted stating it a a defect.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> > Do other  states allow non-disclosure of regisered sex-offenders near/around the
> >>>>> >property intended for sale?  It also brings up the possibility of lawsuits
> >>>>> >against sex offenders who move into neighborhoods on the basis of severely
> >>>>> >depreciated home values.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> How about people known for breaking and entering?  How about people
> >>>>> convicted of Murder?  Manslaughter?   If not, why not?
> >>>>
> >>>>Is that a sore point for you, pedo creep?
> >>>>
> >>>><snip> Ooops! That's all there was!
> >>>
> >>>Yes, we apparently pushed the right button on that one.
> >>
> >>Noting you and he couldn't answer a simple question, I think it's
> >>laughable that you think it pushed a button.
> >>
> >>
> >>>It somehow bothers Gary to know that regardless of how he is categorized in NC,
> >>>he is still a sex offender
> >>
> >>It does?  Heh. Funny, no one told me that.
> >>
> >>> which means that regardless of where he lives from this day forward, all real estate within one mile of him
> >>>will immediately drop in value, anyone who does business with him will
> >>>find their reputation in decline,  and ultimately little old ladies
> >>>will yearn to spit on his haircut.
> >>
> >>Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.  Dumbass.
> >>
> >>>
> >>>Sorry but that's just a fact of life.
> >>
> >>Only in your feeble little mind.  In the real world, I'm doing just
> >>fine and it pisses you off. :)
> >>
> >>> It has not yet occurred to him that the only way to change this fact
> >>
> >>It's not a fact so nothing heeds changing.
> >>
> >>>is spend the rest of his life being a nice person (as opposed to a NG trolling self
> >>>appointed net cop) and then convincing everyone around him that he is a changed man.
> >>
> >>Unlike you, I'm not trying to convince anyone of anything.  But do
> >>dream on, I like a good laugh at your expense.
> >
> >Thanks for publicly demonstrating that nobody pushed your buttons,
> >pedoman.
>
> Pedoman?  That the best you can do?  The least you could do is quote
> Terranson's website or something.

This one is more telling, pedo creep.
https://www.offenderreport.com/cgi-bin/shop.cgi?product=NAR&offer=SMRB&affiliate=903820

> How pathetic.

Yes, you are, pedo creep.

> You'll have to do better if you want to become a fanboi.

<snip> Ooops! That's all there was!