🚀 go-pugleaf

Rasty Shitkersfor wrote:
> On 28 May 2006 21:09:25 -0700, "Michael Baldwin, Bruce"
> <mbbr@mighty.co.za> wrote:
>
> >Rackles Shitsorferd wrote:
> >> On 28 May 2006 16:58:48 -0700, "Michael Baldwin, Bruce"
> >> <mbbr@mighty.co.za> wrote:
> >>
> >> >pedo creep Gary gLitter Burnore wrote:
> >> >> On Sat, 27 May 2006 16:16:04 GMT, "Rusty Shackleford"
> >> >> <nospam@bunnyhole_entertainment.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >In the Thursday May 25 N&O in the 'Local' section (B) a column asserts that
> >> >> >a buyer was just about to close on a house when the real estate agent
> >> >> >received an anonymous call that the person living next door was a registered
> >> >> >sex offender.  The information was verified on the NC website so it was
> >> >> >true. Of course, that killed the deal but the buyer could have lost the
> >> >> >$3000 earnest money deposit. The seller knew about the 'defect' but did not
> >> >> >disclose it. It turns out the NC law does not require this information to be
> >> >> >disclosed! Given that diclosure is mandatory for any other defect in the
> >> >> >property that may affect its value such as airline noise, even bad odors
> >> >> >from a sanitary landfill, why is this disclosure about something that could
> >> >> >make it impossible to re-sell the property, exempt from the rules?
> >> >>
> >> >> A law would need to be crafted stating it a a defect.
> >> >>
> >> >> > Do other  states allow non-disclosure of regisered sex-offenders near/around the
> >> >> >property intended for sale?  It also brings up the possibility of lawsuits
> >> >> >against sex offenders who move into neighborhoods on the basis of severely
> >> >> >depreciated home values.
> >> >>
> >> >> How about people known for breaking and entering?  How about people
> >> >> convicted of Murder?  Manslaughter?   If not, why not?
> >> >
> >> >Is that a sore point for you, pedo creep?
> >> >
> >> ><snip> Ooops! That's all there was!
> >>
> >> Yes, we apparently pushed the right button on that one.  It somehow
> >> bothers Gary to know that regardless of how he is categorized in NC,
> >> he is still a sex offender which means that regardless of where he
> >> lives from this day forward, all real estate within one mile of him
> >
> >There's a web site that lets you enter a location and it brings up all
> >registered offenders in that area. I recall checking up on Gary once.
> >
> >> will immediately drop in value, anyone who does business with him will
> >> find their reputation in decline, and ultimately little old ladies
> >> will yearn to spit on his haircut.
> >
> >Probably explains why he can only get kooks to sign up with him at
> >Databasix.
> >
> >> Sorry but that's just a fact of life.  It has not yet occurred to him
> >> that the only way to change this fact is spend the rest of his life
> >> being a nice person (as opposed to a NG trolling self appointed net
> >> cop) and then convincing everyone around him that he is a changed man.
> >
> >A pedo creep can't change its spots.
>
> Especially when its not only spots but sores!

And lesions and cankers and ...