Article View: triangle.general
Article #1386Re: License Check on Pleasant Green
From: MPG
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 1997 00:00
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 1997 00:00
54 lines
3181 bytes
3181 bytes
> jdfrei@concentric.net wrote: >> obviously we have too many cops if all they have to do is set up >> traffic stops. having or not having a current registration or >> inspection sticker does nothing to stop the real criminals. >> thanks to the wonders of digital imagery, i haven't purchased an >> inspection sticker for either of my vehicles since 1993. Paul Gronke wrote: > Vices: > ..stuff deleted .. > Hiking in North American wilderness areas. > Conservation - man must live in harmony with his surroundings. > Being a Water Resources Engineer > Working at Ogden Environmental and Engineering Services > > Jim Frei, the "not a real criminal" who doesn't know/care if his > automobile meets state emissions and safety standards: What makes you think he doesn't know/care if his automobile meets state emissions and safety standards? Unless you know Jim personally (which you may, for all I know), how do you know that he is not qualified or capable of performing his own inspection and is avoiding only paying the outrageous inspection fee. Your post shows your determination to do whatever the government say is "right." Heck, the government wouldn't lie to us would it? These safety inspections ARE FOR OUR OWN GOOD, right? I have a great deal of respect for our system of government, but when our government stops treating us like children maybe I'll get more respect for it. But then, as a Political Scientist (or one-to-be), you should already be suspect of governments, historically speaking. What's the real reason for these license/inspection checkpoints? I submit that it has nothing to do with checking for these documents. It has all together to do with allowing the officer to get a good look at you and the inside of your car-- a chance he or she would not get normally without probable cause. But these rights are temporarily suspended while the state "looks after our safety." If it were really so important to have such inspections, why do only a few (8? 9?) counties require them? Now don't get me wrong about checkpoints; I am in favor of sobriety checkpoints. But this charade of license/inspection checks is a little too transparent. I'll comply with the regulations because it is easier to do so than not. I'll pick my battles. For the most part, I am happy with our governments. But this does not mean that I agree with everything they do. Perhaps you shouldn't either. Cheers, Matt
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<33FDADAD.1E42@spam.please>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<33F3152A.3202@mc.duke.edu> <5sv5fn$c5t$2@news.duke.edu> <33F38DE6.3C54@intrex.net> <33F384DD.4630@mc.duke.edu> <33F44796.3042@ibmREMOVETHIS.net> <33F8B6E8.D6253F82@concentric.net> <5tfn07$r31$1@news.duke.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 101acf,6046454c0f8d88c4 X-Google-Attributes: gid101acf,public X-Google-Thread: 114e5f,6046454c0f8d88c4 X-Google-Attributes: gid114e5f,public From: MPG <no.more@spam.please> Subject: Re: License Check on Pleasant Green Date: 1997/08/22 Message-ID: <33FDADAD.1E42@spam.please> X-Deja-AN: 268035646 References: <33F3152A.3202@mc.duke.edu> <5sv5fn$c5t$2@news.duke.edu> <33F38DE6.3C54@intrex.net> <33F384DD.4630@mc.duke.edu> <33F44796.3042@ibmREMOVETHIS.net> <33F8B6E8.D6253F82@concentric.net> <5tfn07$r31$1@news.duke.edu> Organization: Bell Northern Research Newsgroups: triangle.general,duke.general