Article View: triangle.general
Article #1462Re: Duke Forest Rapist = House Arrest?
From: Dave Briggman
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 1995 00:00
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 1995 00:00
85 lines
5222 bytes
5222 bytes
gronke@acpub.duke.edu (Paul Gronke) wrote: >In article <43q5ge$ic0@redstone.interpath.net>, > paradigm@mercury.interpath.net (David Briggman) wrote: >Let's see: the guy has no record, he has a steady job, and, yes, his >parents are stable members of the community. How high could the >bail have gone to make it unpayable? 1,000,000? 10,000,000? Thos >kinds of bails are almost never set, are they? Certainly not in a >first offense case. Believe it or not Paul, people who have no prior criminal records commit violent crimes like this hairball is accused of doing...A prior criminal record is taken into account during sentencing (as is his job and his parents)...which is why courts run PSIs (pre-sentencing investigations) prior to their sentencing if they are found convicted. Obviously you have become affixed with the "Gothic Wonderland" and the magic border you and others believe that Duke possesses. I could name countless numbers of people who committed violent acts with no prior criminal record and were not given the privilege of house arrest prior to his court hearing (Timothy McVeay, Colin Ferguson, Blanch Taylor-Moore, anybody involved in the Little Rascals case [all of them were no-bail holds], the law school student who shot up Chapel Hill)...there goes your argument about high/no bails on first offenses. >Dave, the story in the Herald Sun, which you claim you read, says >quite clearly that the District Attorney *requested* house arrest as >a greater restriction on his movements. Wednesday's Herald Sun article made no mention of that...and how does one assume that being on house arrest is MORE restrictive than being in a cell with guards? The only thing the bracelet does on this guy will alert the Sheriff';s Department that he's left the confines of his house...it doesn't shock him and it doesn't provide for tracking him so once he's gone, he's gone. >>book smart, no common sense. > >Dave, weren't you the person who told us not to stereotype schools a >few weeks ago when someone made a disparaging comment about GMU? Go >look this word up in the dictionary: "hypocrite" Actually, Paul, if you'll go back and read the posting, what I said was that most state colleges and universities (both in Virginia and nationwide) could provide a better undergraduate and graduate education in most any field of endeavor (with the possible exception of the Medical School) and that Duke lives off of it's reputation it earned quite a while ago (long before any of the current crop of students arrived here) and doesn't really live up to today. I also said they live off of their alumni and that there are better educational values to be had, I should know, I paid for the law school tuition of my girlfriend, who attended and graduated Duke Law. Lord knows that for the money, most state colleges provide more education and knowledge for the dollar. One of the departments I am contracting for has a fourth year EE who doesn't know what formatting a hard drive does and doesn't know what the operating system of a computer does for the computer...yet he's going to be designing microchips - makes sense huh? Most ten year olds know what that does - my daughter knew when she was five - as do most children nowadays. >Uh, isn't probable cause part of "the totality of the >circumstances." Am I missing something? Just a dumb Dukie, ya >know. You said it, not me...probable cause is determined by the totality of the circumstances in the alleged criminal offense...what you have is a 19-year old white male with a gun who kidnapped three people and raped one of them after giving her the option of rape or being shot (gee Paul, which would you choose)...it has NOTHING to do with whether the alleged perpetrator has committed a crime before or the fact that his parents are both physicians or that he works in Duke Medical Center or that he is an NC State Student - NOTHING, ZERO, NIL. It's amazing how none of the liberals have made any reference to my opinion that had he been black he'd still be in the Orange County jail (a regular term is "pre-trial detention") where the community would be guaranteed to be safe from him and he would be guaranteed to show up for his trial. No such guarantee exists with him on house arrest. Dave
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<43rt5b$f5i@news.duke.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<43q3ih$21a@news.duke.edu> <43q5ge$ic0@redstone.interpath.net> <43qnts$88i@news.duke.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 101acf,37c420307ca12458 X-Google-Attributes: gid101acf,public X-Google-Thread: 108a25,37c420307ca12458 X-Google-Attributes: gid108a25,public X-Google-Thread: 114e5f,37c420307ca12458 X-Google-Attributes: gid114e5f,public From: Dave Briggman <paradigm@mercury.interpath.net> Subject: Re: Duke Forest Rapist = House Arrest? Date: 1995/09/21 Message-ID: <43rt5b$f5i@news.duke.edu> X-Deja-AN: 110530272 references: <43q3ih$21a@news.duke.edu> <43q5ge$ic0@redstone.interpath.net> <43qnts$88i@news.duke.edu> content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii organization: Interpath x-url: news:43qnts$88i@news.duke.edu mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: triangle.general,triangle.politics,duke.general x-mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (Macintosh; I; PPC)