🚀 go-pugleaf

On Sat, 23 Dec 2006 21:23:08 -0600, "crosstar"
<crosstar@nationalist.org> wrote:

>HOMELAND IS HOMEFRONT
>
>Teddy Williams
>
>Not soon after the public voted overwhelmingly against the Iraq-Afghan invasion,
>speculation mounted about how and when George W. Bush would "change" his
>failed policies, in compliance with the will of the people, which he had so long
>ignored.  The only question seemed to be whether Bush would pull out immediately
>or gradually.  But, what was not being mentioned, in anticipation of the "big
>announcement," was that for Bush to do something honorable, he would have
>to have some honor in him.  Yet, this President does not understand honor or that
>"homeland" and "homefront" are the same.
>
>"Honor" is a blood-based virtue, in which integrity, reputation, respect, purity and
>right are all interlaced into one.  Just as "charity begins at home," so does honor
>commence from within.  So, on the one hand, if the Chief Executive promotes
>Negroes over Americans, Mexicans over citizens and foreigners over yeomen,
>he fails the test of honor to his own people, nation and way-of-life.  Loving
>minorities ahead of respecting the majority robs Bush of any moral authority,
>before our countrymen or anyone else in the world, to speak for an Anglo-Saxon,
>Christian, English-speaking "homeland."
>
>No wonder that when Bush announces his "plan," he will be viewed as one who
>does not represent his own people and his "plan" regarded as just another lie.
>Our strength has traditionally been our loyalty, honor and truth, but as Bush
>pollutes our blood and demeans our honor, he, necessarily, wages war upon
>our own nation.  I am not afraid to speak out, because candor, not cowering, is
>what it takes to combat the worst subversion inside the White House, ever in
>our history.  I expect "haughtiness" to supplant honor, at least for the dwindling
>days that Bush holds his slipping grasp.
>
>"Honor" is, also, bound up in self-preservation.  If we act honorably, we can expect
>to garner respect, even from those opposed to us.  But, by welcoming Mexican
>law-breakers with open arms and installing Negroes and lesbians with impunity
>in the military, what is being defended?  Certainly not our homeland.   Minorities,
>aliens and perverts are given the green-light to attack, rob, rape and murder those
>appearing in the image of George Washington, as our identity as a free, ascendant
>and pure nation dissolves before our eyes.  So, don't expect any Bush "plan,"
>begotten of dishonor, to produce honor.
>
>Will Bush's "plan" make one, single housewife safer from carjackers?  Will one,
>single student be spared hearing Ebonics in his classroom?  Will one, single
>working man be freed from taking orders from some Israeli, Jap or Indian?
>Show me a President that preserves our own kind, stands against defilement of
>our blood and perpetuates our own people.  Or, who carries on the heritage of
>our forefathers, procures liberty throughout our land and places our sovereignty
>above all others.  Then, and only then, will I salute.  Meanwhile, I fight and urge
>others to fight the war on our own homefront.
>
>http://www.nationalist.org/alt/2006/122301.html
>
>Crosstar
>Trademark/service of The Nationalist Movement
>nationalist.org
>Not necessarily Crosstar views
>� 2006 The Nationalist Movement 
>
A fine article that deserves wide circulation.

Max