🚀 go-pugleaf

Bullis?  Is that you?

On 13 Dec 2004 18:08:30 -0800, "Megan" <nomeganslaw@hotmail.com>
beshitteth down into triangle.general :

>I'm a disgruntled ex-sex offender from California who is very
>angry about Megan's Law and all of its consequences we're expected to
>just accept. First of all, let me apologize for posting this on this
>particular newsgroup. I realize this is off topic but what I have to
>say is important and posting it on hundreds of newsgroups gets the word
>out to the greatest number of people.
>With the help of internet databases listing us online in April
>2004 I began sending out, and am continuing to send out, letters to
>ex-sex offenders all over the United States advising them of an anti
>Megan's Law Web site I set up. There, my fellow comrades can find
>various ways -- some being quite extreme (and even violent) -- that we
>can fight back in order to regain what little fairness we had before
>Megan's Law was enacted. One way is to list children in our own
>internet database to complement the databases set up with us on them.
>In order to prevent the general public and law enforcement from pulling
>the plug on this site I am making its address available only to fellow
>ex-sex offenders. In September 2004 I set up a duplicate Web site at
>another address and sent pro Megan's Law individuals and organizations
>there to see what I am doing. Despite just having sample children
>listed complaints brought the site down within days. And in early
>October another sample site was also advertised and promptly taken
>down. Luckily, they have yet to find the real site with the real
>children listed and it is alive and well. : - )
>What I'm doing here is providing the text from all my pages
>(except the child database) so you can see how we are fighting back.
>Because this is a plain-text document it contains no italic, bold, or
>underlined words for emphasis as I have on my Web site. In their place
>I have CAPITALIZED those words. Obviously you people will probably
>bitch and want this posting taken down too so what I would suggest you
>do is immediately select all of the text on this page (Command-A on a
>Mac, Control-A on a PC), copy all of the text on this page (Command-C
>on a Mac, Control-C on a PC), and then go to your word processor and
>paste your copied text into it (Command-V on a Mac, Control-V on a PC).
>Failing that, you will surely find this posting on another newsgroup.
>Just search for "anti megans law" as the Subject. If you are using a
>newsgroup reader application program type it in without the quotes and
>no apostrophe in megans.
>You can also access newsgroups from a Web browser by going to:
>http://www.google.com/advanced_group_search. Typing in "anti megans
>law" in the Subject field will list every newsgroup where I have posted
>it -- and as ones get pulled down I'll repost. I WANT society to know
>we won't stand for this crap. In this case, use the quotes but still no
>apostrophe in megans.
>Each page on my Web site contains links to the other pages on the
>site along with a navigation bar at the bottom of each page. Obviously
>those things are not available here. Instead, you can jump to
>individual areas by typing certain words into your news reader's Find
>command. The first page visitors are taken to is my index page and here
>it is:
>
>
>
>
>***index***
>
>Welcome Everybody,
>
>In April 2004 I set up this Web site and in September 2004 began
>advertising it by various methods to the general public. Obviously
>you're here because you got one of the numerous E-mails I sent out,
>read about it on one of the many newsgroups I posted on, or saw one of
>my many fliers. Or you may have even stumbled across it during a search
>engine search. In any event, I'm a disgruntled ex-sex offender from
>California with a non-violent felony conviction on my record dating
>back to the late 1960s. My disgruntled nature emerged with the
>enactment of Megan's Law in 1996 and has grown more severe over the
>years as public sentiment against us being free in society has
>increased. Prison life is bad enough for ex-sex offenders. (Note; I
>always use the term ex-sex offenders. Unless we're currently engaged in
>illegal sexual activity we are to be considered ex-sex offenders -- not
>sex offenders.) Fellow inmates hate us worse than murderers, even
>though our victims are still alive to enjoy life, and on account of
>that attitude we suffer harassment after harassment from them. And in
>some cases even prison staff joins in the harassment. The "lucky" ones
>only suffered verbal abuse. Those of us less fortunate had to also
>endure physical abuse. When I got out of prison I put most of my
>elevated anger behind me and obediently registered with police in my
>local community as was required to do under California's Penal Code
>Section 290. Back then that was the end of it. If I never moved from
>that address nothing more was required -- no neighbors being notified,
>no yearly updating, no nothing. If I did move, all I'd have to do was
>notify them in writing.
>Then Megan's Law came into effect nationwide and changed it all.
>Here in California it requires police to notify neighbors when those
>classified as "high risk" ex-sex offenders are released. That's bad
>enough, but then police in some communities began taking it on their
>own, which the law permits, to notify neighbors when NON "high risk"
>ex-sex offenders are released. Now those of us who committed no
>violence or force at all in our crimes became subject to not only the
>embarrassment of neighbors knowing, but potential harassment and/or
>even abuse. Sure, there's laws to punish those who abuse us, but what
>good are they if law enforcement puts capturing and punishing such law
>breakers at a low priority? And there's numerous other side effects to
>Megan's Law we have to suffer which I address on other pages contained
>on this site.
>With the launch of this site in April 2004 I began sending a brief
>letter to numerous ex-sex offenders whose names and addresses I got off
>of the internet. At this time California doesn't list us online,
>although that will soon change, and we are prohibited from accessing
>the database at police stations throughout the state, like everyone
>else in the general public can do, so my letters are limited to ex-sex
>offenders in other states. (Some local California communities are
>putting their own ex-sex offenders online though and I can get to
>them.) But that's okay as our comrades in other states suffer the
>effects of Megan's Law in much the same ways we in California do. To
>see the letter I'm sending out click here. (Obviously that won't work.
>Instead, type ***letter*** in your Find command and you'll be taken
>right to the letter.) To get back to this page just use your browser's
>back button. (Again, that won't work. To get back to where you left off
>type a few words of the next sentence in your Find command.) Please
>accept my apology for the pop up ads when new pages open. I get the Web
>space for free and a side effect of that is you get to see ads. Oh
>well! There's no such thing as a free lunch, right? Just close the ads
>as soon as they open and you won't be bothered. The ad at the top of
>each page is theirs too. I'm not advertising anything other than my
>ideas, and they're provided for free as my gift to you. (Each page on
>this site also has a navigation bar at the bottom allowing you to move
>throughout the site quite easily.) On this site you'll hear my idea
>about setting up an internet database with children listed on it to
>complement the databases set up with us on them. I provide a sample to
>give you an idea how the real one with actual children listed looks. To
>date, the only California children listed are ones I, and a few fellow
>ex-sex offenders I've met at police stations around town, have found
>and it will remain that way until legislators get all of our other
>California comrades listed on the internet so I can get the word out to
>all the rest. This project is really a multi-person effort and we need
>input from as many people as possible. Actually, having my name and
>address listed on the internet is a mixed blessing. No, I wouldn't like
>people knowing about my past; but yes, I would like having the ability
>to get the word out to my fellow comrades so I can really stick it to
>all the pro Megan's Law people we have to deal with. And speaking of
>pro Megan's Law people, I'm in the process of setting up a database
>with THEIR names, work and/or home addresses, and pictures on it too.
>All those actively involved in screwing us ex-sex offenders over in
>some ways, or even speaking favorably about it, are who I'm after.
>While I do not have a sample database of them to show here, you can be
>rest assured it is much like the child database.
>Please note, the real children are at a totally different Web site
>(also set up for free, but with a more obscure name so as not to show
>up in search engines as was the case for the first site I sent the pro
>Megan's Law community to that contained the name nomeganslaw) available
>only to ex-sex offenders. I'll do the best I can to keep it out of the
>hands of you "regular" people which would obviously try to have the
>site taken down. (As of this writing that hasn't happened yet. The real
>child database is alive and well right where I originally put it. Not
>so for the site I'm providing you pro Megan's Law people. It has been
>taken down and re-established at a new home twice so far.) And that
>also goes for the E-mail address I give to ex-sex offenders for us to
>communicate with. (Notice your copy of the letter I'm sending them has
>those addresses xed out. I would like to hear from you regular people
>though. For you to contact me please use: nomeganslaw@hotmail.com. Now
>I know all you people probably want to get on my case and tell me how
>sick I am for having this kind of thinking. Well if that's all you've
>got to say, save it. I already know that. I know I'm a dangerous
>sociopath. I accept it and work around it. If you've got something
>constructive to say, speak up -- otherwise stifle it! (And don't ask a
>question that is clearly answered within these pages. One E-mail I got
>from a pro Megan's Law person asked what is the purpose of listing
>children.) To the best of my knowledge I am not breaking any laws by
>expressing my beliefs as to how ex-sex offenders SHOULD fight back.
>Despite that, I do not wish to have my identity known. Knowing full
>well the improprieties law enforcement is known for and how I would
>respond back -- well let's just say that that's a dark tunnel we don't
>want to explore. Knowing how Web site activity can be traced these
>sites and my E-mail addresses were set up from different public
>computers under different fictitious names and I will never access them
>from home nor from the same public computer more than a few times. Due
>to that I will only access my E-mail every other week or so so if you
>don't hear from me right away don't think I didn't get it.
>Now that you know where I stand it's time to see what my fellow
>ex-sex offenders are being told. To see an identical copy of their Web
>site (minus the real children listings and my contact information)
>click here. (***sam***) But before you do please feel free to grumble a
>bit if it will make you feel any better.
>This Page Last Modified: Sunday, October 31, 2004
>
>
>
>
>***letter***
>
>Dear fellow ex-sex offender,
>
>I'm an ex-sex offender from California. I got your name and
>address off of an internet Web site listing such information on
>registered ex-sex offenders. If you were in prison like me you probably
>suffered harassment after harassment from inmates, and maybe even
>prison staff, on account of your conviction. And chances are, you also
>suffered some physical abuse. And if so, prison staff probably cared
>less about punishing your attacker either. When I got out of prison 30
>some years ago I registered with police in my local community as was
>required under California's Penal Code Section 290 and that was the end
>of it. If I never moved from that address nothing more was required --
>no neighbors being notified, no yearly updating, no nothing. If I did
>move, all I'd have to do was notify them in writing.
>Then in 1996 Megan's Law came into effect nationwide and changed
>it all. Here in California it requires police to notify neighbors when
>those classified as "high risk" ex-sex offenders are released. That's
>bad enough, but then police in some communities began taking it on
>their own, which the law permits, to notify neighbors when NON "high
>risk" ex-sex offenders are released. Now those of us who committed no
>violence or force at all in our crimes became subject to not only the
>embarrassment of neighbors knowing, but potential harassment and/or
>even abuse. Sure, there's laws to punish those who abuse us, but what
>good are they if law enforcement puts capturing and punishing such law
>breakers at a low priority?
>I'm the kind of person who likes to return wrong for wrong. If I'm
>embarrassed I like to embarrass them back. If I'm aggravated
>unnecessarily I like to aggravate them back. If I'm cost money I like
>to cost them back. If they use a certain technology against me I like
>to use that same technology to their disadvantage. (On my Web site
>you'll hear my idea about setting up an internet database with children
>listed on it to complement the databases set up with us on them. Sort
>of like using the SAME technology for an opposite of what they're
>trying to accomplish. If you knew me, you'd know such actions bring
>quite a chuckle to my belly.)
>While I favor avenging wrongs, I've always believed in non
>violence where no one suffers any physical injuries in any way. I favor
>aggravating, embarrassing, inconveniencing, and/or costing a
>perpetrator who has done me wrong. My official position is that I do
>not recommend or encourage anyone to break any laws. Although I often
>do "speak favorably" about how I would LIKE to see someone avenge a
>wrong. While there are a number of law abiding ways to avenge wrongs --
>and these I DO encourage -- some may cross over that line a tad; or
>even more than a tad. What's a tad you ask? Never mind. While I would
>like to see some of these imaginative episodes happen, I don't
>"encourage" them. I expand on that in my disclaimer on my Web site
>which I encourage you to visit at your convenience.
>On its pages I present a number of dirty tricks and underhanded
>stunts, some with skewed humor, (but sometimes humor is the best
>medicine to deal with the aggravation they've caused us) that I think
>could go a long ways to alleviating some of the anger we have built up
>on account of this Megan's Law crap. Because helping abused ex-sex
>offenders is my latest project as a disgruntled ex-sex offender I'm
>offering this stuff to you free of charge. While I don't make a penny
>on this project, it's more important for me to help my fellow ex-sex
>offenders out because if we don't help each other ain't no one going to
>do it and things are only going to get worse. Think not? How about new
>laws in some communities prohibiting us from living within certain
>distances of schools and then making us move at OUR expense even if
>we've been there for decades causing no problems at all and have
>memories built up at that home?
>In my particular case I'm long off of all parole/probation
>supervision and am not prohibited from contacting my fellow ex-sex
>offenders in any way. But I do realize many of you are on supervision
>of some kind and may be prohibited from associating with ex-sex
>offenders. But does that include not communicating even in writing
>while we're miles apart? Even by not communicating together you can do
>some things to make it better for us ex-sex offenders and some of these
>things don't break the law in any ways. I encourage you to check out my
>Web site and glean what information you think will be useful to you --
>and in turn all of us. If you're afraid to use your home computer, or
>if you don't have a home computer, I would suggest using one at your
>local library. They're free to use and there's no way to trace the Web
>sites you visit, or even that you used the computer at all. Many
>libraries don't require you to have a library card to use their
>computers. You just sign up for an hour time slot with the librarian.
>Some of the ones that do require a library card when you sign up for an
>hour have several other computers set up for "express" use. These
>computers, which you wait in line to use, have a time limit, usually 15
>minutes. At the end of the time limit software installed on the
>computers automatically logs off and resets for the next person. If no
>one is waiting to use it you can just re-type in the Web address you
>were last viewing and continue on. (Suggestion: Get there before school
>is out for the day and you'll have shorter wait times.) This is ideal
>for you ex-sex offenders that may be prohibited from using a computer
>as a condition of your probation or parole. There's always a work
>around. We CAN be a thorn in the side of those favoring Megan's Law;
>and we can do it without bringing suspicion on to ourselves.
>(While I'm not prohibited from contacting ex-sex offenders in any
>way, a new law here in California makes it a misdemeanor for ex-sex
>offenders to "enter" the California ex-sex offender database Web site
>which will soon be online. No other state databases I've visited have
>this restriction. Obviously, California wants to keep us from
>communicating together. Let me emphasize -- other than a
>parole/probation restriction you may have, it is NOT illegal for us to
>communicate together. And in the strict language of this new law it
>isn't even illegal for us to view its contents. We just can't "enter"
>the site. If a family member or friend, who is not a registered ex-sex
>offender, logs on to it and then turns the computer over to you you can
>spend hours on the site without breaking the law. Viewing and exiting
>is not illegal -- just entering it. Now granted, this may be nit
>picking and they'll surely say the lawmakers' intent was to prohibit us
>from viewing its contents, but the way it stands we just can't "enter"
>it. Be that as it may, those concerned enough are advised to use a
>library. And remember, no law prohibits you from visiting MY Web site.
>And no other states prohibit us from viewing their ex-sex offender
>databases.)
>While the judicial system may not like the ideas I'm spreading --
>which I hope they don't -- I stand tall upon the shoulders of our
>Founding Fathers who wrote our First Amendment which allows me to voice
>my opinions freely to anyone. Is this a great country or what? : - )
>This is my way to turn a disadvantage at us back to them and crush them
>with it while laughing in their faces all the way. An opposite of what
>they want to accomplish. And it's especially joyful to do it without
>even breaking the law. Yes, I know some of the ideas I pose are illegal
>to do, but it's NOT illegal to speak favorably about them. It's that
>First Amendment thing you know. Hmmm. And it doesn't get much better
>than that.
>Enough of that. Here's my Web site address:
>http://xxxxx.xxxxx.com. And my E-mail address is: xxxxx@xxxxx.com.
>Please note, I only access it every other week or so so if you don't
>hear from me right away don't think I didn't get it. If you're
>concerned about someone finding out who you are I suggest going to a
>library and setting up a free E-mail account at: http://www.hotmail.com
>or http://mail.yahoo.com or one of the many other free services out
>there. You don't even need to use your real name or address. It would
>be good for me to have a way to get in touch with you. That way, if
>they shut the Web site down -- which they did within days to two sample
>sites I sent pro Megan's Law people to -- I can give you the new
>address once I get it back up, either at the same place with a
>different name or at an entirely different Web site. A number of
>companies give free Web space. As a backup plan go to this newsgroup
>address to get the current Web site address: xxx.xxxxx.xxxxx. Once
>there search for xxxxx as the subject and open that message for our
>current address. To the best of my knowledge, setting up the database I
>speak favorably about is not illegal. (But even if it is, or becomes
>so, they don't know who I am.) Together we can make a difference.
>Remember, these things happen to us ONLY because WE allow them to
>happen. Whatever we do, we must do SOMETHING to keep it from getting
>worse. If we all band together in a show of solidarity we can nip this
>Megan's Law crap in the bud before it gets any worse. My Web site gives
>numerous ideas and we can ALL do something. If these abuses continue
>it's going to be on US for allowing them to. Remember that!!! Now let's
>get busy! Enjoy. : - )
>Oh, and one more thing -- some of the databases that list ex-sex
>offenders on the internet include those still in custody. For those,
>I'm sending this letter by mail. I fully realize you guys don't have
>access to the internet. I would be more than happy to print out the
>pages of my entire Web site and send them to you at my expense. Here's
>what you need to do to get it. Have someone on the outside E-mail me at
>the above address. If this person knows nothing of your offense that's
>no problem. Just have them ask for the vitamin catalog, or the weight
>lifting catalog, or whatever this person knows you have an interest in.
>When I get the E-mail I'll know what you're asking for. I know some
>prisons don't allow internet-printed pages in the mail. Not to worry.
>Your copy will be disguised as a legal document. Not only won't it have
>the navigation links at the bottom of each page to click on, but I'll
>print it out on 28-line numbered paper double-spaced just like other
>legal documents you get in the mail. While it won't be sent as legal
>mail like an attorney sending it (as that would be illegal to do),
>which gets opened in front of the inmate, it won't draw suspicion from
>staff as anything that should be inspected closely. There's always a
>work around to get the word out and I know how to do it. We need all
>the help we can get -- both from the inside and the outside. Even if
>you don't wish to become more involved you can be rest assured there
>are others out here who are fighting for YOUR justice and are taking
>every opportunity to avenge what was done to you.
>This Page Last Modified: Sunday, October 31, 2004
>
>
>
>
>***sam***
>
>Welcome my fellow ex-sex offenders,
>
>Now here's where we get busy and get some work done. First of all,
>some of you may have found your way to this Web site by word of mouth
>rather than learning of it from the many letters I've already sent out,
>and am continuing to send out, to ex-sex offenders all over the United
>States. If so, click here (***letter***) to get up to speed as to what
>I am doing. To get back to this page just use your browser's back
>button. Please accept my apology for the pop up ads when new pages
>open. I get the Web space for free and a side effect of that is you get
>to see ads. Oh well! There's no such thing as a free lunch, right? Just
>close the ads as soon as they open and you won't be bothered. The ad at
>the top of each page is theirs too. I'm not advertising anything other
>than my ideas, and they're provided for free as my gift to you. (Each
>page on this site also has a navigation bar at the bottom allowing you
>to move throughout the site quite easily.) I'm also advertising my
>anti-Megan's Law activities to the general public by way of E-mails,
>newsgroup postings, and fliers. To see the Web site page I'm directing
>them to click here (***index***).
>Okay, now that you're up to speed I want to impress upon you all
>the importance of keeping this Web site's address and my E-mail address
>between ourselves. Don't even admit you received my letter if
>questioned. Pro Megan's Law people out there (Meganites I call them),
>which probably includes 99.9% of society, would surely try their best
>to shut the site and E-mail account down in order to prevent us from
>sharing information together. I have a separate E-mail account for the
>general public to contact me and that is not being provided to you. I
>trust the Meganites will want to keep that channel with me open as we
>work together at alleviating the problems Megan's Law is having on us,
>and in turn back upon society when we fight back. In their hunt to find
>out the Web address I'm providing to you, it's possible law enforcement
>will randomly contact a number of ex-sex offenders and threaten them to
>tell the truth. If you're contacted don't fall for it. It may be a
>violation of your probation or parole to communicate back to me, but
>it's not a violation to receive an unsolicited letter. I understand if
>you don't want to communicate back, but please, let our fellow activist
>ex-sex offenders do so. You have nothing to lose and A LOT to gain.
>Like any advocacy group, we need to have a catchy name. I propose
>SAM. It stands for ex-Sex Offenders Against Megan's Law and we could
>call ourselves Samers. I would say Good Samers, in that we're trying to
>help society be fair to ALL their citizens, but I don't think the Good
>Sam RV club would like that very much. So we'll just be Samers --
>taking what steps are necessary to make life better for us, and in turn
>society. While I speak of certain steps throughout this site I need you
>to be aware that my writings fall within the provisions of my
>disclaimer which you can read by clicking here (***disclaimer***).
>As we fight this journey to justice we have to realize this is a
>war -- it's us against them, and war can sometimes get ugly. We are the
>most hated scum of the earth; the latest group, in a long list, of
>people suffering some form of oppression at the hands of others.
>Apparently we'll be the last though. I don't believe society will ever
>again tolerate oppression of any other groups. Blacks won their
>freedom, gays are working at it, and us ex-sex offenders are just
>beginning -- we've barely stepped off the curb. But when you hear the
>anger directed at us on some talk radio shows you can easily see it
>getting worse before it gets any better. We just have to make sure THEY
>fall on the worse end. Those of us who have paid our debts to society
>and are leading crime-free lives wonder how otherwise good people can
>be so cruel. I've compiled a list of pro Megan's Law Web sites which
>you can view by clicking here (***links***). As I learn of new ones
>I'll add them, if you find 'em please send 'em. You can easily see
>we've got an uphill battle, but it's a battle we MUST not lose. Or in
>the least, if we do lose, we'll have fought a fierce battle and
>accomplished a lot of damage on our enemies. Partial victories are
>better than no victories at all! Do I hear an Amen? Several of these
>pro Megan's Law Web sites have links to the handful of states that list
>us online. Please take it on your own to print out my letter and send
>it to as many of our comrades as you can. The more people we get
>actively involved in this war the better things will get for us.
>
>As I previously mentioned, back before Megan's Law came into
>effect California only required ex-sex offenders to register ONCE in
>person at the police station after we were released from prison.
>Nothing more was required unless we moved, and then that was done
>merely by notifying the police in writing. (Of course, changing your
>name requires notifying them too.) Now, Megan's Law went and changed
>the whole damn thing around to where we have to appear IN PERSON at the
>police station within 5-days of our birthday EACH year. (And if we're
>homeless we have to do it every 60-days. That too just recently
>changed. It had been every 90-days.) Some police stations only do it
>one day a week within certain hours. If it's day time we're expected to
>take off work at our expense. If it's at night we're expected to be
>there even if we have plans to attend some special event with our
>families. And if we're out of town we're expected to return to our home
>town in order to update our registration. And they won't even work with
>you on this. One year I tried to register a week early so I could keep
>my original plans and they wouldn't allow it. Their reason -- it was
>outside the plus or minus 5-day period and the law doesn't allow it.
>Well the law didn't allow the revenge I enacted either but it still got
>done. I was still mad, but at least I was able to spread the anger
>around to others, and that helped. Fortunately we're not charged any
>money to do this, but Massachusetts ex-sex offenders aren't so lucky.
>They have to pay a $75.00 fee EVERY YEAR when they re-register. And
>then of course I already covered how neighbors get notified of our
>presence and some states post our names and addresses on the internet
>under the guise that it SUPPOSEDLY protects children better.
>In March 2003 the United States Supreme Court upheld the posting
>of our information on the internet. Among things the Court said are:
>"Sex-offender registries are not an unconstitutional extra punishment
>for offenders who already have served their sentences." "The publicity
>may cause adverse consequences for the convicted defendants, running
>from mild personal embarrassment to social ostracism," but the laws are
>intended "to inform the public for its own safety, not to humiliate the
>offender." "The law is not punitive, and therefore it does not punish
>the inmates after the fact." "Our system does not treat dissemination
>of truthful information in furtherance of a legitimate governmental
>objective as punishment. The purpose and the principal effect of
>notification are to inform the public for its own safety, not to
>humiliate the offender." The government had argued that it was not
>burdensome for offenders to report to police every 90 days to provide
>information, including their addresses, and to have their pictures
>taken, because all people have to fill out paperwork in government
>office to vote, register a car or get married.
>I've long been a believer in doing something that gives them the
>opposite of what they're trying to accomplish. If they think these
>things protect children better we need to show them how Megan's Law can
>endanger children more than ever but I'm getting ahead of myself here.
>Practically every Web site listing us ex-sex offenders has language
>exact or similar to this wording. "The privacy interests of persons
>convicted of sex offenses are less important than the government's
>interest in public safety." "Release of certain information about sex
>offenders to public agencies and the general public will assist in
>protecting the public safety." "...noting that any privacy concerns
>must give way to the compelling interest in notifying the public of the
>whereabouts of a sex offender in order to protect the public." "This
>law was implemented to allow potential victims to protect themselves
>and allow parents to protect their children." "The release of this
>information to the public is a means of increasing public safety and
>not to punish the offender. The information may not be used to harass
>the offender or commit any crime against that person. Public safety is
>best served when offenders are not concealing their location to avoid
>harassment."
>If they think having us visible AND exposed to harassment is
>making their communities safer, I've got a piece of swamp land I'd like
>to sell them. Back in 1997 I followed with interest the story of
>57-year-old Sidney Landau, a "high risk" ex-sex offender who was
>released to Orange County, California right after Megan's Law went into
>effect. Parole officials had to keep moving him around because
>neighbors wouldn't stop hounding and picketing him. As soon as a new
>neighborhood found out about him they'd be out there doing the same
>damn thing. Eventually on April 25th a TV cameraman got into his face
>too much and Sid pushed him a bit. That resulted in him having his
>parole violated and imprisoned another 6-months. Now if that guy's
>anything like me, he was severely harassed in prison and possibly even
>physically abused. And I'm sure if he was, prison staff barely, if at
>all, punished the abuser -- even if they went to the trouble to find
>out his identity. But when it comes to Sid just pushing a cameraman a
>bit WHO WAS HARASSING HIM, its the ex-sex offender who ends up doing
>time. I know how being a double-standard victim feels so I can
>sympathize with the guy. (It's kind or ironic -- with only one
>conviction on my record I don't even come close to being classified as
>a "high risk" ex-sex offender. Yet voicing my opinions on these pages,
>as legal as it is to do thanks to our country's First Amendment,
>probably makes me more dangerous to society than a number of the REAL
>"high risk" ex-sex offenders out there.)
>Its happened more than once since 1997; some high-school student,
>disgruntled about something like being teased too much, goes off and
>shoots a number of his classmates. And how about all those disgruntled
>postal employees we've heard about over the years going back to their
>former employers doing the same thing to them? Now take a guy getting
>out of prison, probably chuck full of the abuse after abuse levied upon
>him by inmates and maybe even prison staff. All he wants to do is
>resume his life and be at peace. But no -- no one will let him do that.
>And wherever he moves, probably at his own expense too, the law makes
>his identity known all over again. He sees himself never having peace
>and the law is on everybody's side that is denying him of it. Do you
>see the powder keg about to explode here folks? Young high-school
>students with a full, healthy, and long life to live have done it with
>no prior warning. Disgruntled employees have done it. Now here's an
>older guy with not a lot of time left to live anyway, and therefore not
>a heck of a lot to lose, knowing he'll never get any peace. There's no
>waiting period on buying rifles, so even if he knows no ex-convict
>buddies with access to weapons, getting a gun is no problem. Besides,
>he's going to be dead in a matter of hours so what does he care that
>the paperwork he filled out to get the gun will be turned in to police?
>But it's even simpler than that. All he has to do is take a kitchen
>knife, he surely has in a drawer at home, and while casually walking by
>a group of small children on their way to or from school stab as many
>as he can before he is apprehended. (Actually buying an awl from the
>local hardware store would work better. Its stronger blade wouldn't
>break as easily and it would slide into the heart with less effort and
>cause less bleeding. Before someone discovers the small puncture wound
>the kid would be dead.) Do you see the possibility that this kind of
>guy is MUCH more disgruntled than any of the other shooters we
>mentioned here? Do you see how it's a very likely scenario to happen?
>It hasn't happened yet, but doesn't that just mean we've been lucky so
>far? Now I wouldn't actively walk through gang-infested territory in
>the dead of night, especially wearing the wrong color of clothing, but
>I sure wouldn't be milling around in a crowd of neighbors like the kind
>that were harassing Sid for days on end either (or other ex-sex
>offenders suffering the same form of harassment more recently). One of
>these days folks -- just don't snivel. I don't want to hear anybody
>saying, "we had no idea he would do that." What's saved everybody so
>far is the newness of Megan's Law. A tiny fraction of the thousands of
>postal employees went over the edge. A tiny fraction of the thousands
>of high-school students went over the edge. The law of averages
>dictates that as we reach thousands of ex-sex offenders being harassed
>by Megan's Law, a tiny fraction will respond, and when we're talking of
>thousands, a tiny fraction means one or two of them. I've never seen
>the law of averages broken by anybody. And here's some more things to
>chew on. These disgruntled employees and high-school students did not
>have set or established patterns of criminality to their thought
>processes, yet still were set off. What do you think the odds of it
>happening to someone with an already-established criminal personality
>-- who doesn't mind breaking the law -- would be? It's not a matter of
>IF it will happen folks -- it's WHEN! Get ready. While the Washington
>D.C. area sniper attacks of October 2002 were not committed by a
>disgruntled ex-sex offender, they clearly show the lengths that
>disgruntled people will go to to settle scores.
>Have you ever thought about the possibility that someone
>sympathetic to the plight of abused ex-sex offenders -- maybe not even
>being an ex-sex offender himself -- and who has a terminal disease may
>want to do one last "service" to abused mankind? Remember when actor
>Michael Landon was diagnosed with terminal cancer in the early '90s?
>Imagine somebody like that that's not old and feeble and has full
>physical and mental abilities just like a healthy person does, except
>he has only months to live. With nothing to lose and a desire to make a
>political statement that abuse of ex-sex offenders will not be
>tolerated any longer, let's say he wants to blow away a group of Sid
>Landau like protesters. I'd bet future potential protesters will think
>twice before they decide to harass another released ex-sex offender.
>While I never encourage violence, my anger level is high enough that a
>part of me would feel good it happened for THAT particular reason.
>Remember when the bombing of the federal building in Oklahoma City
>happened on April 19, 1995? First news reports were pinning it on
>Mid-East terrorists as the culprits. Then we learned it was done to
>avenge the government's attack upon the compound at Waco, Texas. I and
>several disgruntled ex-convicts I know, who also had suffered some
>unfairness by the judicial system, felt especially pleased it was done
>for THAT reason. We hated it happened; but we were glad it was avenging
>judicial system misconduct and not foreign-terrorist related -- if that
>makes any sense. Actually, every one of us abused ex-sex offenders
>could settle a lot of our pent up anger near the end of our lives when
>we have nothing to lose if we did one big event of this magnitude. I
>won't encourage it -- but I won't discourage it either. In reality, I'd
>love to see it happen, but I'll leave that up to you guys. My
>philosophy though is if society is going to violate us then we SHOULD
>violate it back -- it's OUR duty. If you've got any money for others to
>inherit though make sure you distribute it out first so the victims'
>families don't get any of it. It's not as big of a win if your money
>doesn't go to where YOU want it to go.
>Here's another thing that occurs to me. We could be very peaceful
>and quiet neighbors with no thoughts of committing any crimes yet have
>a barrage of nosy hateful neighbors doing everything possible to get us
>out of there. And then a few houses away there could be noisy barking
>dogs and no one complains a bit. I'd like to see thrown out ex-sex
>offenders return to those neighborhoods in the dead of night and throw
>rat poison laced meat over the fences of those yards with noisy dogs.
>They put their priorities on a quiet ex-sex offender instead of a noisy
>dog. Now maybe neighbors can think more of the dogs, where they should
>have been thinking before. Misplaced priorities I call it. Having their
>priorities on the WRONG thing. I always like doing something to
>violators in order to get their thinking back where it belongs. If you
>don't want to go that far here's something I'm sure you'll see as
>acceptable. Every time I run across a flier on a telephone or street
>light pole asking for help locating a lost dog I tear it down. The way
>I see it, if they don't want us ex-sex offenders in their neighborhoods
>then I don't want their noisy pooping dogs either. That's where my
>attitude is on the subject and I hope you share it with me. And while
>you're at it, tear any other fliers down too. Spiting the society that
>spites you is anger relieving. Not as much as some bigger forms of
>revenge mind you, but every little bit helps.
>CBS's 60 MINUTES addressed the topic of school shootings in their
>May 16th, 2000 episode. They reported that the Secret Service was
>researching assassination and school shootings and here is a quote from
>the show. "One of the things they're teaching is that school shooters
>were most often victims of teasing. Teasing so malicious that it drove
>them to thoughts of suicide. We think the line between suicide and
>homicide's a very thin line. 'Cause at the point of suicide for some
>people it's, I'm in great pain, wait a minute, that person caused the
>pain -- before I kill myself I'm going to kill them."
>60 MINUTES once again visited the disturbing topic in their May
>14th, 2002 episode which reported that the Secret Service has now
>completed their research. Their findings are published in a report
>titled THREAT ASSESSMENT IN SCHOOLS: A GUIDE TO MANAGING THREATENING
>SITUATIONS AND TO CREATING SAFE SCHOOL CLIMATES and is available in PDF
>format directly from the Secret Service's Web site by going to
>http://www.secretservice.gov/ntac/ssi_guide.pdf. Here are some quotes
>from the show. "Most of the school shooters follow the same path.
>They're motivated by revenge. They're isolated. They feel cut off from
>adults. And many contemplate suicide. The research indicated that they
>plot their attacks for months, almost never express a direct threat
>against their target..." Further on it was mentioned that, "...there
>were common motivations. Most shooters were overwhelmed by feelings of
>failure and depression. Feelings provoked by other kids in school. One
>of the key findings in the report is that a lot of these kids were
>subjected to merciless bullying in school. Bullying and teasing is a
>national scourge across America and it happens in schools everyday.
>Over a hundred thousand kids each day won't go to school because
>they're afraid of being bullied. And boys talk about the fact that
>their lives have been made so miserable, they'd rather be dead, or in
>some cases hurt others, than be bullied again. One young man wrote just
>days before he pulled the trigger. 'My assault on the school is the
>only thing I live for. I want to laugh at the pain I cause these fools.
>Personally I'll be glad to die because living my life has been the
>greatest hell I can imagine'." Alright people, we all know now the
>problems that excess teasing can cause. Schools are FINALLY taking
>steps to stop bullies. All I ask is that ex-sex offenders are not left
>flapping in the wind and forced to personally settle up abuses we've
>suffered at the hands of others.
>
>In May 2002 it was reported that somebody was strategically
>placing razor blades and nails in the sand at various playgrounds
>throughout Orange County. At the time we had no knowledge one way or
>another who could be doing it. My first thought was that it could be an
>overly harassed ex-sex offender FINALLY putting his foot down on the
>excessive harassment Orange County was notoriously known for dealing
>out to ex-sex offenders. While I don't like seeing children, or
>anybody, physically injured, I was hoping that if a reason became
>known, that it was this one -- after all, they were only minor
>injuries. In some way we've GOT to put a stop to this kind of ongoing
>harassment some communities are egregiously known for committing and
>we've GOT to let them know we won't stand for it. We've got to let them
>know we're the wrong people to screw over. And if they think for one
>minute they can do it, we've got to show them how wrong they are; no
>matter WHAT it takes -- and that includes inflicting injuries if
>necessary. The Supreme Court has made it clear that these side effects
>to Megan's Law we're suppose to endure are not considered "punishment."
>Well if they're not considered punishment then make sure you don't
>accept them without returning some punishment back on to society. An
>arrest was eventually made and unfortunately that was not the reason
>for the razor blades. Oh well! Maybe next time.
>As I'm putting the finishing touches on this site in early April
>2004 it appears next time is here. Somebody is placing small nails and
>aspirin tablets in the sand at a couple playgrounds in Orange County.
>We'll see how this one pans out but I sure hope it's an ex-sex offender
>venting his anger. (Addendum dated September 11, 2004: No further
>incidents and no arrest has been made. If it's an ex-sex offender we
>need more of this. This is an ideal venting practice.) Just 30 some
>nails is causing a lot of anguish for parents and the news media is hot
>on the case. Imagine if each one of us put a handful of nails --
>costing us only pennies from a local hardware store -- in our local
>playground in the dead of night and then sent the news media a letter
>explaining why. As these prejudice parents learn their anguish is on
>account of what THEY'RE giving us maybe they'll see the wisdom in
>letting us live at peace -- for ONLY then is everyone safe. They want
>safety for their kids. Let's make sure WE have a say in how that can be
>accomplished. We MUST not be silent passive victims any longer. We MUST
>not allow them to abuse us any longer. We MUST make it clear there are
>penalties for doing so. Be a voice in your community. Be action in your
>community. Speak out, act out, fight back; and don't let ANYONE screw
>you over! If they think for one second they're seeing the light at the
>end of the tunnel in this war against us let's make sure we give them
>some more tunnel. Sometimes you have to force people into what is
>right. And what is right HAS to be done -- one way or another. On the
>subject of sending a letter, it goes without saying -- handle it only
>with gloves so you don't leave any fingerprints behind, and don't lick
>the envelope or stamp so you don't leave any DNA behind. It's not
>satisfying if you don't get the last word and you can only do that by
>coming out the victor. Also, don't do the playground more than once.
>That way surveillance teams will come up dry. For only some minor
>injuries we can cause a lot of grief to the Meganites and cost the
>judicial system a ton of money investigating it. Obviously they'll
>snivel a lot, but they'll surely realize it's better than killing kids.
>And if all goes well that won't be necessary. Of course if it is, it's
>better them than us. We have to put OURSELVES first.
>THE FRESNO BEE in Fresno, California (March 21, 2004, page A14)
>reported that THE STAR PRESS in Muncie, Indiana put the photographs of
>63 ex-sex offenders on their front page and their addresses and crimes
>on another page inside the paper. This resulted in at least five of the
>ex-sex offenders getting fired from their jobs. One had been out of
>prison for a decade and told an interviewer how upset and mad he was at
>seeing his picture in the paper. (Well duh. Do something about it then
>guy. Don't just talk about it. Avenge it!) STAR PRESS Executive Editor
>Evan Miller (who has a disgusting self-satisfied look on his face in
>THE FRESNO BEE article) said the newspaper realized that some of the 63
>could suffer, but "we made a decision that the information was more
>valuable than the potential for fallout." He was speaking about the
>fallout that the ex-sex offenders would face here but our job -- your
>job, you fellow ex-sex offenders in Indiana -- is to make sure the
>fallout lands on the pro-Meganite community and lands hard. Turn your
>anger into revenge. Get me Mr. Miller's home address and I'll publish
>it. And while you're at it, get me the home addresses of his
>co-workers. And heck; I'll publish the home addresses of any
>pro-Meganite zealots (those actively doing EVERYTHING possible to screw
>us over) out there anywhere in the United States, be they average
>citizens or law enforcement personnel (police officers, prosecutors,
>judges, and the like). (Just follow them home from work, it's that
>easy. If you lose them one day pick them up at that point the following
>day at the same time. Possibly even use a different car so as not to
>tip them off.) Let's see how they like having their addresses on the
>internet. And if they got kids, be sure to get me that information too.
>Publishing the kids of pro-Meganite zealots is a higher priority than
>the kids of regular people and that's as it should be. (All those
>people making news in the last few years by picketing some ex-sex
>offender out of town can be assured their children are listed. I made
>it a personal project to travel to those neighborhoods to get them.)
>Mr. Miller is the poster boy for the kind of person and his family I
>ESPECIALLY want to get listed. We've got to reel these kinds of people
>in. They HAVE to be taught a lesson. And here's another thing you can
>do. Put their names and addresses on stick on labels and stick them on
>street light poles in gang-infested parts of town. Stating that they're
>abusive cops just might get gang members helping us out without
>realizing it. On April 21st of this year (2004) a 16-year-old Pomona,
>California gang member shot and killed a California Highway Patrol
>officer he didn't even know just because he was a cop. While everyone
>snivels when something like this happens, they fail to realize this is
>really pay back for the gun-happy actions of some law enforcement
>officers. There's way too many times I've heard of a police shooting
>being ruled as "justified" when the incident could have safely been
>handled in a non-lethal manner. That topic isn't part of this Web site
>so I won't expand on it further, but suffice it to say there is a lot
>of anger towards police out there. One thing you Indiana ex-sex
>offenders could do is walk through the employees parking lot at THE
>STAR PRESS and put small scratches on nice new cars. (The kind of small
>screwdriver used to tighten eyeglass frames is ideal in that it is
>easily concealed in the hand and, that being made of a harder metal
>than a small nail, it stays sharp for multiple uses.) To prevent
>drawing undue attention to yourself put some actual unrelated fliers
>(xerox copies of someone else's flier) on the windshield as you make
>the scratch. That way snoops will see nothing out of the ordinary as
>people are always putting fliers on cars. Obviously don't leave any
>finger prints on the fliers. Once you're safely away mail them a letter
>as to why it was done. Us fighting back shouldn't surprise THE STAR
>PRESS. They even mention a prediction that what they did "...could
>itself trigger more crimes." We need to make sure it does. Of course, I
>don't encourage it as per my disclaimer. I merely speak favorably about
>it. I'd just like to see it happen -- that's all. God Bless America for
>allowing me to say that. : - )
>While I've usually limited my favorable speech about revenge to
>non-violent methods where no one is physically injured, I've come to
>realize that most Meganites don't care what happens to us. (Heck, one
>of those pro Megan's Law groups I have listed on my links page has
>PedophilesEliminateThesePredatorsandParasites as part of their Web site
>address.) Just listen to talk radio when the topic is on the air. Quite
>a few callers and even some of the hosts (who I'm especially out for
>getting listed), who would probably not physically injure us
>personally, openly express no regrets -- and sometimes joy -- when
>someone else does it. And as I see it, if they don't care when we
>suffer some injuries then we shouldn't care if others suffer some
>similar injuries. Turn about is fair play. Once we're released from
>prison our debts for past wrongs are considered paid. As long as we're
>not currently breaking any laws we need to consider ourselves as
>INNOCENT victims if we get victimized anew in some way. Everyone was
>outraged when the children got small cuts from those buried razor
>blades and nails in the May 2002 case. (So far there have been no
>injuries in the April 2004 case.) And in May 2004 everyone was outraged
>when some Iraqi prisoners got humiliated, embarrassed, and roughed up a
>bit. (While we later found out some were beaten more severely,
>initially we only knew of humiliation and minor injuries and that alone
>caused great outrage among a large portion of society.) If they're not
>going to feel equal concern for our happiness, freedom, and safety in
>society when we wish to lead law-abiding peaceful lives then we need to
>make sure others feel some of the agony we feel. We shouldn't feel
>guilty about inflicting minor injuries when they don't feel guilty
>about the ones we receive. If they don't care about our safety then
>let's make sure we don't care about theirs, or their kids. I believe we
>should not only show them how their children COULD be less safe with
>Megan's Law in effect -- we should MAKE them less safe. One of those
>opposites I love so much to accomplish. That may be tough for some to
>swallow, even some of you abused ex-sex offenders may not want to go
>that far, but we must at least cause SOME irritation back to society.
>We can all do something that fits comfortably within our individual
>revenge tendencies. Remember, this is a war, and war sometimes injures
>innocent people -- collateral damage as the military folks call it.
>They drew first blood first by enacting Megan's Law -- don't forget
>that. Injured children is a small price to pay for our safety. And
>they're not letting up any time soon. In May 2001 Corpus Christi, Texas
>State District Court Judge J. Manuel Baales reviewed the records of all
>ex-sex offenders placed on probation in his court in the last decade
>and summoned some of them back to court. Baales then ordered some of
>them to put up signs 2-feet wide by 18-inchs tall in their front yards
>saying, "DANGER! Registered Sex Offender Lives Here." The signs also
>had a list of phone numbers to report suspicious behavior. The ex-sex
>offenders were also given similar bumper stickers for their cars and
>portable signs with suction cups to put in car rear windows when
>they're riding in someone else's auto. And other ex-sex offenders who
>were not made to display the signs were ordered to send letters to each
>neighbor within three blocks of their homes. Baales has no sympathy for
>the ex-sex offenders who believe their privacy is being trampled on.
>"These laws [sex offender notification laws] are designed to protect
>the community," Baales told Ted Koppel in an interview for the May 29,
>2001 edition of ABC's NIGHTLINE. "The whole idea is to protect the
>community, protect the children, and if targeting these offenders is
>what's necessary then that's what we'll have to do." Baales said he was
>more worried about people who the offenders might harm in the future.
>That's exactly why we NEED to not only show them their kids COULD be in
>more danger, we need to MAKE them so. To paraphrase what Baales said,
>"if targeting society's children is what's necessary then that's what
>we'll have to do." As long as they're going to put us through any kind
>of extra aggravation we never used to have before Megan's Law went into
>effect it's our duty -- our obligation -- to give them some extra
>aggravation they never used to have. It's that turn about is fair play
>deal; you know how that works by now. We need to turn this Megan's Law
>crap back around and crush them with it. (And this is ESPECIALLY true
>if law enforcement goes out of their way to violate us on purpose IN
>ANY WAY above and beyond the bounds of regular Megan's Law conditions.)
>Parents may not like it, but I'm Constitutionally allowed to express my
>beliefs and opinions as long as I'm not encouraging illegal activity --
>and I'm not. I just wish you guys would DO these things. And by the
>way, I don't mean targeting children for sex, I mean other kinds of
>physical injuries. Remember -- we're ex-sex offenders. Ex being the
>emphasized word here. We don't want to have sex with kids any longer.
>We just want to live in peace among the rest of society and we need to
>take WHATEVER steps are necessary to achieve it. Once we're able to do
>that, we're back in remission and children will be safe. Now you
>Meganites have a decision to make. Either we're all save, or no one
>will be safe. We're giving you the road map to follow. See if you can
>stay on course without wandering.
>I need to watch my words here lest I might be accused of making an
>illegal threat of some kind, and we don't want that do we? If stating
>that we will leave your kids alone if, and only if, you leave us ex-sex
>offenders alone falls under the provisions of illegal threats of some
>kind then I wish to unsay those statements. As stated in my disclaimer,
>my specific intent is to say only legally permitted statements. Seeing
>that this letter is going out to nearly all states it's possible some
>of my borderline wording is legal in some states but illegal in others.
>For such instances you have my disclaimer to fall back on. I am not a
>lawyer, nor do I play one on TV, so if I have slipped up in some way
>then accept my apologies and remember what my specific intent is.
>Rather than totally retract such statements that cross the
>legal/illegal boundary you readers are free to jockey my words around
>to where what I'm trying to convey still gets across to you but it does
>so totally above board.
>Now realistically, I don't expect some of these more severs
>settlement processes to happen with any frequency, but as the numbers
>of ex-sex offenders I contact runs up into the thousands I do believe
>the numbers will rise. And as Megan's Law claims more newly released
>victims, I'm sure there will be a jump in settlements. (Those wishing
>to engage in more benign settlement methods try these on for size. Get
>the 800 toll-free telephone numbers from those pro Megan's Law Web
>sites I have listed on my page of links. Then make up little stick on
>labels saying Free Porno Talk and list their 800 number. Stick them on
>pay phones all around town and trust me, their phone will be ringing
>off the hook. Being they have to pay for the calls their phone bills
>will go sky high and money that would have gone toward helping them
>abuse us will now be used to pay their phone bills. That's SO cool. And
>there is a 35 cent surcharge on top of what the call costs when 800
>number calls are made from pay phones. Seeing that you cannot block the
>number you're calling from when you call an 800 number these kinds of
>calls need to always be made from pay phones. Next, get some sex Web
>site addresses and put them on stick on labels. Now go to a library or
>bookstore and stick them inside books intended for teenagers to read.
>You can also put them up on street light poles along the streets kids
>use walking to and from school. That'll piss some people off. And how
>about this. Using these same labeling methods let kids know that they
>can make money by going to the area of town where prostitutes work and
>letting men give them oral sex. Boys go the gay part of town, girls to
>the straight part. That'll irritate the hell out of parents. Now
>granted, most kids probably won't do that, but it will give their
>parents some extra worry and aggravation, and that alone can make us
>feel a bit better knowing they're suffering some more -- all because of
>Megan's Law which was SUPPOSE to quell their worry and suffering. This
>is SO cool! Everything we can do to spite society counts -- no matter
>how little. For me, it's like an aspirin to relieve a big headache I
>have because of what is being done to us. It doesn't get much better
>than that.)
>And while we're on the subject of injuries, how about forcefully
>poking us with a needle in order to take our blood for DNA matching.
>For those like me who committed our crime decades ago it was ESPECIALLY
>angering when after years of law-abiding behavior I was forced to
>suffer this pain JUST because they changed the law to include those of
>us who were sentenced under the old law. What I would like to see is
>each one of us put a bicycle in the back of our car (no license plate
>to see and you can get away quickly) and then drive to a different
>neighborhood than where we live. Then get the bike out and ride up to a
>kid and briefly poke him or her with a pin. Nothing serious, just a
>small poke -- much like a needle would do. Then hand them a pre-written
>(with disguised handwriting and no fingerprints on it) note saying it
>was avenging being forcefully poked with a needle for DNA purposes. I
>doubt many of you ex-sex offenders will do this but believe me, if we
>ALL did it, it would surely upset the status quo in a BIG way and I am
>certain pro Megan's Law people would begin to see the old way was
>really safer for society. Actually nails in the sand would satisfy the
>poke for a poke anger in a safer way and cause just as much outrage.
>Those ex-sex offenders who are concerned more for children's safety
>than their own need to realize such injuries from nails in the sand are
>very minor. They're more upsetting than they are injuring. And here's
>another thought. Instead of nails, try thumbtacks.
>
>But besides going as far as these examples over the edge, us
>ex-sex offenders can do other things to endanger neighborhoods and in
>some cases not even break the law. For one thing, we can find out who
>each other is. And once we do that, we can communicate with each other
>and share notes together. (If there's interest I'd be glad to set up a
>group for us at http://groups.yahoo.com.) For the states that list us
>on the internet how easy is it now to find some like-minded ex-sex
>offenders living in our area with which to share information? A lot
>easier than it was before all these databases were available to
>EVERYONE I'll tell you that. Some states don't list our addresses on
>the internet though. Okay, sometimes it takes a little extra work.
>Phone books, either the good old fashioned paper kind or ones on the
>internet, are readily available. As I've become angrier and angrier
>about the ways society is treating us ex-sex offenders I've come to the
>conclusion that it's high time we do something to turn it around on
>them so they can see how it feels. Let's see how they feel about having
>their sweet child's description, address, and possibly photo accessible
>to ex-sex offenders throughout the world on the internet. Maybe then
>they'll see how we feel about having our information out there. Now
>just so you know, I'm not talking about engaging any children into
>sexual activity of any kind or even asking them to do so. This whole
>information disclosure bit is just to irritate the hell out of them so
>they can get a tiny taste of how we feel about OUR information out
>there. One of those opposites I like so much to accomplish. Turn about
>as fair play? Sure; works for me. : - ) Of course, my child database
>includes a proper disclaimer just like those databases listing us does,
>"The information may not be used to harass...or commit any crime
>against that person." I love it when we can turn their OWN quotes
>around and crush them with them. : - ) One Web site listing ex-sex
>offenders says, "Certainly the widespread release of this information
>will remove at least some children from harm's way." Truly, they didn't
>figure on a complementary database to theirs. But what do they expect?
>Us to just accept this shit? I DON'T THINK SO! We got to do SOMETHING
>to protect ourselves from harassment when no one else will. They say,
>"this information may only be used to protect a person at risk" and I
>agree. Both of our databases are DESIGNED to protect people at risk --
>just different people; theirs being children, ours being ex-sex
>offenders. There I go, turning their quotes around on them again. Hmmm.
>To them I'd ask how does it feel? One more of theirs says, "I sincerely
>hope that this information will not spark unjustified acts" and with
>that I say Amen. I wish no one on either side of the fence has to be
>injured or harassed in any way. That may be wishful thinking because
>war is war. Injuries and deaths are part of it. Just remember, they
>drew first blood first with Megan's Law. It's high time we made them
>wish they would have left us alone. And before all you pro Meganites
>E-mail me stating that WE drew first blood by molesting or whatever we
>did, ya I know that. But we got caught. We paid our debts, and now
>we're starting all anew. As I said earlier, as long as we're not
>currently breaking any laws we need to consider ourselves as INNOCENT
>victims if we get victimized anew in some way. It's you Meganites that
>restirred the pot. YOU'RE the violators. YOU'RE the perpetrators. You
>need to be caught and punished for your misbehavior. And seeing that no
>one else will do it, it's up to us.
>Organizing ourselves to counteract harassment and abuses isn't
>anything new. In the mid-1970s the NORTH AMERICAN MAN BOY LOVE
>ASSOCIATION (NAMBLA) (located at: http://www.nambla.org) was founded in
>response to police going beyond the call of proper police procedures in
>their crackdown against pedophiles in Boston, Massachusetts. Soon it
>became a worldwide organization, not only openly distributing material
>that speaks favorably about inter-generational sexual relationships
>where both partners enthusiastically desire a relationship and want it
>to continue, but they also actively lobbied for the end to laws
>prohibiting such sexuality. Is it a far stretch of the imagination to
>see them, or someone like them, asking fellow "boy lovers," as they
>call themselves, to collect information on children in their
>neighborhoods so it can be distributed over the internet? And, once
>again, I'm talking here of ONLY collecting the information -- not
>crossing over the line to illegality by soliciting or engaging children
>into sexual activity. NAMBLA's official position has always been that
>it does not encourage others to break the law, it only promotes changes
>in laws to make mutually-desired sexual activity legal for anyone to
>engage in.
>And NAMBLA is not the only "boy lover" -- or "girl lover" for that
>matter -- Web site out there. It doesn't take too much effort to find
>Web sites on the internet that speak favorably about inter-generational
>sexual activity. Suffice it to say, the "boy love" and "girl love"
>movement is alive, well, and organized already. Getting child
>information can be accomplished in a variety of ways. I'm asking you,
>my fellow ex-sex offenders, to be creative and take WHATEVER steps are
>necessary -- and that you are comfortable with -- to accomplish that
>goal. Here's one I use in California. Hang around outside the police
>station during the times they register ex-sex offenders. When
>registrants come out hand them a copy of my letter and encourage them
>to join us in our battle. If we're lucky they'll pick up the cause and
>recruit at other police stations around town. Another thing you can do
>is attach fliers to street light poles or whatever is around in areas
>ex-sex offenders would surely walk by on their way to re-register. On
>my fliers I put: "ATTENTION 290 REGISTRANTS. Tired of being harassed
>and bothered? Me too! As a group we can stop it. See
>http://xxxxx.xxxxx.com for details." Of course, you ex-sex offenders in
>other states would use whatever code number your state uses for
>registering. I would avoid using ATTENTION EX-SEX OFFENDERS because
>that would draw everybody's attention to it and someone would surely
>tell the police who would then tear it down. Because the average person
>doesn't know what 290 is they would just pass on by with barely a look.
>The longer it takes police to become aware of the flier the longer it
>stays up and the more of us see it. Putting the flier near parole and
>probation offices would surely get it seen by more ex-sex offenders as
>they pay their regular visit to their PO.
>In March 1999 an elected official from Arizona was interviewed on
>talk radio. He was authoring a bill he wanted to call "Amy's Law" if it
>is passed. This federal law -- named after Amy who was apparently
>killed by someone who was released by another state -- would punish
>states that release ex-sex offenders who commit a new crime in another
>state. Should the law pass (I believe it has), the releasing state
>would be forced to foot the bill for prosecuting the guy in the state
>he went to and also pay off the victim's family. The Arizona official
>openly bragged that his idea behind the law was to encourage states to
>pass laws to keep ex-sex offenders in longer -- if not forever. Jumping
>on his bandwagon was Marc Klass, the father of Polly Klass who was
>murdered by a released ex-convict. That particular case led to
>California passing their three-strikes law. But he ain't satisfied with
>that. He wants a one-strike law for rapists, murderers, and child
>molesters -- even the ones who used no force or violence at all. And
>some states already passed laws to shuffle off ex-sex offenders to
>mental hospitals AFTER their prison sentences are up -- giving them the
>power to keep them in forever. When once we used to be able to go to
>the mental hospital and avoid prison, and it's abusive inmates, now
>they want to put us in the mental hospital AFTER our prison sentences
>are up and not give us any credit for the time we've already done. And
>they even have the nerve to say it isn't punishment. By calling it a
>"civil" commitment rather than "criminal" they jockey the words around
>in such a way that they're able to sidestep the expiration of our
>original sentences and stick us with more time. If they were really
>concerned about giving us treatment, and making us better, they should
>commit us to the hospital at the outset. That way, we could avoid the
>emotional damage the prison environment, and its prejudice inmates,
>will inflict. That's how it was back in my day. Sex offenders who
>either had small children as their primary sexual interest, or those
>who were forcible rapists, could get classified as a Mentally
>Disordered Sex Offender (MDSO) and get committed to a state hospital.
>They still did their time -- they were just housed with other sex
>offenders and avoided the hostilities of prison. Because I didn't fit
>into one of those two categories I wasn't able to avoid the prison's
>damaging effects and, as you can see, I am still lashing back at
>society over the damage it caused. Like I've been known to say, "these
>things happen to us because WE allow them to happen. WE have the
>ultimate responsibility to determine our fate. If we're going to keep
>on getting abused, it's on us for allowing it!" We HAVE to band
>together and put our foot down. This is nothing less than a war that is
>escalating. These right-wing wackos -- and left-wing for that matter --
>have to be nipped in the bud real quick! Sure, what happened to Polly
>Klass was awful, but don't put every child molester in that same
>category. Of course, if you do get stuck in the mental hospital make
>sure you jump through all their hoops. Hopefully you'll have anger and
>similar beliefs like I profess here but make sure you don't express it
>to the hospital staff, or even your fellow inmate/patients who may be
>snitches. Be peaceful and compliant to all the rules. While you're
>inside it's THEIR ball game. Play along in whatever ways are necessary
>to get out. Quell your anger by knowing you'll get your turn later when
>you're up to bat.
>
>I have been criticized that the child database practices I speak
>favorably about here could be considered "using children." My answer is
>SO! I believe we have to use ALL available tools at our disposal to
>stop the injustices that are inflicted upon us. I'm sure those who
>suffered the atrocities of Nazi aggression during World War II
>developed some imaginative ways to ease their suffering and stop it
>from continuing that their oppressors wouldn't have liked. With so many
>in society favoring harassment of ex-sex offenders ya got to realize we
>gotta' do SOMETHING. Doesn't that go without saying? Duh! Besides, as I
>mentioned above, no one cares whether we are put into positions that
>could subject us to harm, so why should we care if others are??? And
>that attitude's as it SHOULD be. We need to shield ourselves until the
>virus of pro Meganites has run its course. Remember, to the rest of the
>country, and even the world, we're scum. We need to return that very
>same attitude back to them. I just love the idea of using the very same
>technology they're using against us BACK on them. One of those
>opposites I love so much accomplishing. Is this internet technology a
>hoot or what? : - )  : - )
>Now think of this scenario for a minute. A sympathetic apartment
>manager in a drug-infested part of town, where neighbors don't seem to
>care, could rent out ONE of his units for 5 to 10 bucks a month to so
>many different ex-sex offenders (which he can easily find on the
>internet) that he could make more money than if he rented it out to one
>family alone. These ex-sex offenders then could use this place as their
>address for sex-registration purposes and live in any neighborhood they
>want to totally hidden and free from harassment. Of course, law
>enforcement would say that's illegal for them to do if they're not
>really living there and police could easily ascertain this hiding
>method by visiting the place to see if anyone really is there. Well
>then let's say each ex-sex offender permanently puts some of his
>personal possessions in the place -- a sleeping bag maybe, toothbrush,
>toothpaste, soap, a couple changes of clothes, a radio. Now, if police
>become suspicious and want to verify the guy's "residence" they can go
>in and see that he DOES have stuff there. Keeping the place looking
>lived in could easily be a cover-their-ass scheme. Obviously, the
>apartment manager would notify the ex-sex offender of the snooping
>activities of police so he is on alert and can adjust his life
>accordingly. Completing the process would be registering his car and
>driver's license at that address too.
>You can bet we will develop some self-protection methods as
>society harasses us more and more. Previously we were all registered
>and police knew right where we were. Now this Megan's law crap comes
>along and no one will know where we're at. Hopefully they'll keep all
>this in mind when they read something like, "Public safety is best
>served when offenders are not concealing their location to avoid
>harassment." Sometimes we get punished more severely for committing a
>non-violent crime JUST because it has the "potential" to cause injuries
>to another and that elevated its severity level. Think of the POTENTIAL
>liabilities they're exposing THEMSELVES and their loved ones to when
>they harass, openly speak favorably about harassing, or give tacit
>approval to harass ex-sex offenders. Let the Meganites chew on that
>awhile.
>I've personally always liked a non-violent revenge that
>accomplishes the opposite of what they're trying to accomplish.
>Distributing personal information on children and pro-Meganite zealots
>for all to see sort of turns Megan's Law back around against those who
>seem to think that society is safer if similar information about us is
>out there for all to see. While putting such child information online
>is probably not illegal, walking up to children and snapping a picture
>and then putting IT up on the internet might be. But then again, our
>pictures are snapped and put up there against our permission and we
>have no recourse. Hmmm. If you can't get a picture, don't worry. Just
>describe the child in as much detail as possible -- including how cute
>they are. To the Meganites I ask, do you think turn about is fair play?
>Do you still think Megan's Law and internet distribution is as wise as
>you did before you began reading this Web site? Have you ever
>considered how it CAN backfire on you? Do you think you can now?
>One thing I should add -- when we march our asses on down to the
>police station each year to re-register we should go there with a
>different look. If you normally have a mustache and/or beard shave them
>off. If you don't have one or the other grow them for a couple weeks.
>If you don't have any gray hair add a little gray. If you are gray dye
>some or all of it out. Go there with glasses if you normally don't wear
>any -- that kind of thing. If they're forcefully taking a picture of
>you it can be a bit appeasing knowing they're getting you in a way you
>don't normally look. And any papers you have to fill out and sign
>consciously try to have different handwriting. The less accurate
>information they have on you, which they really have no business having
>anyway, the better. But do give truthful answers in your writing. Just
>write differently. This isn't meant to aid you in molesting a child and
>getting away with it, which it could do. Remember, we are ex-sex
>offenders. This is to just give them as little accurate information on
>you as possible. This way, if someone like Evan Miller comes along and
>prints your picture in the local paper you'll at least look a little
>bit different.
>People tend to be the most cooperative when their pocketbook is
>affected. So if common sense doesn't work, go for the jugular -- hit
>'em in their pocketbook where it hurts. It may make a crisis for the
>judicial system, but then things usually get done in a crisis. Actually
>hitting them in their pocketbooks may be the only option ex-sex
>offenders have. Arguments about fairness, justice, compassion, and/or
>common decency toward us simply won't fly with most lawmakers or the
>general public. If you don't believe banding together to economically
>devour a community works just look what Arizona's Martin Luther King
>Jr's. holiday fiasco cost them. First, the governor eliminated the
>holiday for the state and then voters agreed. According to a USA TODAY
>article, "Boycotting is popular resort for activists" by Cathy Lynn
>Grossman in the October 11, 1994 issue on page 4D, the Phoenix
>Convention & Visitors Bureau said that within 5 years they lost between
>160 and 170 events worth $100 to $250 million -- including the 1993
>Super Bowl, National Basketball Association All-Star Game, and World
>Figure Skating Association championship. Needless to say, voters gave
>in to the financial pressure and approved a King holiday in November
>1992. After their "change of heart," they were awarded the opportunity
>to host the 1996 Super Bowl. According to the article, other states
>also lost millions due to boycotts for various other reasons. In nearly
>every one the boycotts got the desired results and then some. See what
>the power of money has to pressure certain behavior? Get their
>pocketbook and you get their attention; get their attention and you
>have a voice, it's that simple. It works every time; eventually.
>Remember Rule # 1: Monetary incentives is the key. If you do an action
>that from an economic standpoint they can't defend against, you've got
>'em by the balls -- right where you want them.
>In fact, police use the economic pressure of financial costs to
>get their way too. In October 1993 in an effort to settle a pay
>contract dispute they started towing in people's cars for minor
>infractions they normally don't, like having no license or
>registration. The news media said they hope mad people will bitch
>enough to force officials to give them a good contract so they'll quit
>and resume their normal emphasis on REAL crimes. Actually, they're
>neglecting the essentially innocent pawns they're victimizing in this
>tactic. All these towing victims have to pay $40.00 to get their cars
>back just because the police wanted to play hardball at the cost of
>others caught in the middle. I know what I'd do if I was a pawn in that
>case. If our country can impose "economic sanctions" on other countries
>because we want to get them to change some of their behavior to
>something we want, then we (you and I) can impose "economic sanctions"
>on those who we want to change some of their behavior.
>One thing I'm especially pissed about is having to go down to the
>police station every year at my birthday to re-register. My decades old
>conviction happened during the PREVIOUS Penal Code Section 290 wording
>which did not require that crap. Ex post facto law is SUPPOSE to
>prohibit someone sentenced under a more lenient law from receiving a
>harsher sentence on down the line when that law is stiffened, but do
>they go by that? NO! Each of us having to do this yearly crap should
>time -- from the time we leave home until we arrive back at our front
>door -- how long it takes to re-register every year. My thoughts are
>that if every one of us abused victims fights back in some way our
>abusers would be forced to take a more proper course of action. I would
>love to see every annual re-register victim do one act of vandalism for
>each minute we have stolen from our lives on account of this crap and
>then notify the vandalism victim why it was done. I truly believe such
>fighting back -- if done on a big enough scale -- would cause such a
>public outcry that the old Penal Code Section 290 register once only
>provision would be quickly put back into place. (Of course, as my
>disclaimer clearly spells out, I do not encourage illegal behavior.)
>Scratching nice new cars -- one for each minute plus one for each
>dollar we lost off work or other registration cost we suffered -- and
>leaving notes behind glued near the scratch is one thing that could be
>done. Going into a clothing store and merely walking among the racks of
>clothes with a new single-edge razor blade (available in the paint
>department at Home Depot) to cut small slits in numerous clothes on the
>racks and then mailing them a letter telling them why can also
>alleviate some of the anger. And believe me, passing anger onto others
>does alleviate it. It's not perfect -- but it does help. The old saying
>about misery loves company is true. When you're angry it feels good --
>REALLY GOOD -- to make others angry. Obviously for this one you would
>want to go to a store miles from home. That way, if your picture is
>taken by security cameras and shown around nobody would recognize you.
>(Disguising yourself with a long wig, glasses, and full beard might be
>good ideas too. And I mean more here than the minimal change of looks
>you should do for your annual visit to the police station to
>re-register.) Costing society back should also be done if you're stuck
>with a cheap-ass job because your conviction keeps you from working at
>a more enjoyable and/or higher paying kind of job. Now before you all
>show concern that these people are innocent and have nothing to do with
>Megan's Law or its provisions realize this. While they may not be
>directly involved with Megan's Law or abusing us, they are quite likely
>IN FAVOR of it, after all, the majority of society is, and that in
>itself makes them guilty. Sure, their guilt is less severe, but there
>is guilt there. Don't consider them totally innocent. Every person I
>see out in public I consider a Meganite -- somebody that is worth
>blame, and somebody that has nothing coming from me. I never leave a
>tip at a restaurant (or anywhere else for that matter), I don't donate
>to charities (especially ones that help kids), I don't donate blood,
>and I made sure that when I die no one will get any of my organs. After
>all, they're not doing anything for me during life. I want to make sure
>society has nothing coming from me -- in life, or in death. These are
>some of the little things we ALL can do to disadvantage society and
>that are perfectly legal. Disadvantaging society -- that's the name of
>the game.
>And speaking of the scratching of cars. If you're one of the
>ex-sex offenders who's gotten thrown out of town supposedly because
>they thought you were a danger in some way here's a great chance to get
>back at that community. In this case though, you can't leave a note
>claiming to be the expelled ex-sex offender because they would know who
>you are unless you claim to be a different disgruntled ex-sex offender
>mad at what was done to this other guy. But that's a bit too risky for
>my taste. (In the above examples a note or letter was no problem
>because there are probably hundreds of ex-sex offenders in the area who
>could be suspects.) Even without leaving a note, it can be satisfying
>to victimize the community that victimized you. You CAN be a danger,
>when before you wouldn't have been. But in this case it's THEM who set
>off the dangerousness by getting into your private law-abiding affairs
>-- not your sexual inclinations. One of those opposites I like to
>accomplish. Yea. : - )
>And these communities that throw us out need to know that we are
>going after THEIR children with much more vigor to get them listed in
>our databases. When I first started gathering information on children
>some months ago I went to those communities that had been in the news
>within the last few years for expressing their hostilities to ex-sex
>offenders. Several paragraphs ago I spoke of poking children with a
>pin. Those who don't want to injure a person in any way have another
>option. From your bicycle throw a small amount of paint on to some
>kid's clothes being careful not to get any in their eyes. No injuries
>happen and they're cost money in that their clothes are ruined. Think
>it's extreme? Well how much does it cost us when we have to keep moving
>all the time? And how much does it cost us in lost wages when we can't
>have the better paying job we're otherwise eligible for? And separately
>from cost, how about getting stuck living or working at a place we're
>unhappy about? Just think how outraged the community will be that
>someone is targeting their children. Trust me -- it will feel good
>knowing they feel some of the anger they are making us feel. They were
>so worried we were going to target their kids when we weren't going to.
>Now let them chew on the fact that on account of THEIR actions, we are.
>An opposite of what they were wanting to accomplish. Oh so cool!!! It
>doesn't get much better than that. Save yourself some money. Instead of
>paint, save the used motor oil from your car the next time you change
>it. I bet some garages would give you some of theirs for free, after
>all, they have to pay extra to have it disposed of as hazardous waste.
>Just tell them it's for your kid's school project if they ask. If any
>of you Samers out there have any other dirty tricks up your sleeves
>please pass them on. As new things come in I'll update these pages.
>Each page on this site has the date it was last modified at the bottom.
>By glancing at it first you will be able to tell if the page has
>changed since you last viewed it. We can all have a lot of fun gumming
>up the wheels of the Megan's Law crowd. It's already a lot of fun, it's
>work -- but fun work. Let's just get a bunch of us out there working
>our tails off. SAM RULES! Yessss!!! And by the way, those of you overly
>concerned about not wanting to injure children in any ways consider
>this. In World War II our country bombed Japan knowing innocent people
>would get killed, or in the least, blasted with deadly radiation
>leading to horrible deaths. And in Iraq, even though they can aim smart
>bombs away from civilian areas, they realize there's no guarantee. War
>is war and collateral damage is always a possibility. Our government
>accepts it, many U.S. citizens that are favorable to the war in Iraq
>accept it. It's high time we accept injuries might be necessary in our
>journey to justice.
>Some communities don't even let the ex-sex offender get to his
>home town to begin with, making him instead live at least 35 miles
>away. Now how dangerous can that be? When I got out of prison I had an
>Aunt and Uncle to live with for a few months while I got my life back
>together and with their help I made a successful transition back to a
>law-abiding life. Of course, no neighbors knew anything so that posed
>no problem either. Now fast forward to today. Just like back in my day,
>California inmates get $200.00 from the state when they get released.
>Now how far will that go in today's economy? Today as a released ex-sex
>offender I'd be stuck in some strange neighborhood with barely enough
>money to survive. Unless I was lucky enough to have a friend or
>relative at least 35 miles from my previous home that was willing to
>put me up for awhile I'd probably be living on the street before long,
>or else doing some petty crime in order to get rent money. Now which
>person do you think is more dangerous? Me living in a supportive family
>setting or me on the streets? And that doesn't take into account my
>disgruntled nature and desire to punish the community that says I can't
>live there. Truly society was safer not harassing me. Today's newly
>released ex-sex offenders need to make society know that it's just as
>true for them. Just to clarify, that 35-mile distance is 35 miles from
>the community where he committed his crime. If he committed his crime
>more than 35 miles from home then living in his home town should be no
>problem. More than likely though, most of us committed our crime in our
>own home town and we face this 35-mile distance problem.
>
>In 1999 California did what truly could be a child-endangering
>action. They eliminated the statute of limitations for sex offenses
>committed years ago. Someone safe from arrest for many years now became
>eligible to face charges for an offense they committed decades ago.
>This change in the law, along with an internet accessible ex-sex
>offender database, could easily endanger these child, now adult,
>victims. Imagine two ex-sex offenders living law-abiding lives now, but
>worried some victim from years ago aware of the change in the law will
>come forward to police. Now imagine these two hooking up together after
>meeting through an internet ex-sex offender database. They could enter
>into an agreement to where if one of them is arrested for a decades old
>offense the other one could kill the other's victim so he or she
>wouldn't be able to testify. With the offender in jail no heat would
>come back on him provided the murder was done in a well-planned-out
>way. The prosecutor would then have no choice but to drop the old sex
>charge and release the offender. In my crime I had sex at several wild
>parties back in the late 1960s and three of the women I had sex with
>were underage teenagers. (For those of you too young to remember, the
>country was going through a free-love movement back then. Sex, drugs,
>and rock & roll ruled. And, of course, AIDS didn't yet exist.) Despite
>them being willing participants and me not being that much older than
>them, I was still an adult and the prosecutor, very much down on drugs,
>went after me full bore. Now bear in mind, the girls never initiated
>the complaint. One was merely overhead by a parent bragging on the
>phone to a friend about the guy she laid. The thing is though, police
>only knew about two of the girls and it's only those two I was
>prosecuted for. The third was never known. Actually, if she would have
>been I probably wouldn't have gotten any more time. But the thing is
>though, with this change in the law she -- along with corroborating
>testimony from her two friends -- could now come forward and bring
>charges. Knowing these girls like I did I never really had that worry
>but if I did I'd sure want a way to protect myself from arrest for what
>I did years ago. While I like to shy away from physically injuring
>others in order to enact revenge, if it's a choice between my freedom
>and somebody else's life -- their life's gonna' go. There's no question
>about it. I may not like it, but like I always say; C Y A comes first!
>Cover Your Ass. Fortunately in 2003 the United States Supreme Court put
>the statute of limitations law back where it belongs and these ancient
>victims are once again safe. While talk radio lambasted the Supreme
>Court for letting these old-time ex-sex offenders go by unpunished they
>failed to realize the potential lives that were surely saved. Now
>here's another thing. Two currently active sex offenders could also
>hook up together with the help of their local internet database and
>agree to take out each other's testifying victim if one of them is
>arrested. I never thought of that when I was arrested, and wouldn't do
>it today even if I knew where the two girls, now women, live. But if I
>would have known then what I know now about how I suffered in prison
>(some of it amplified by hostile inmates), along with the money I lost
>to attorneys and being off work those years in prison, I wouldn't
>hesitate to take them out. It's that C Y A thing you know. And that's
>as it should be. (And I only did 2 years. Imagine my anger level if I'd
>have gotten the kind of sentence they're giving out today for the very
>same crime.) Several times I've heard on news about a kid being
>released after a few hours of being molested by a sex offender and the
>kid gives enough information to where the guy is promptly arrested. It
>doesn't take long before the guy realizes he could have been home free
>if only he would have killed the kid. While I don't like speaking
>favorably about violence, I know how bad prison life can be, not only
>for regular inmates, but ESPECIALLY for sex offenders. Even those who
>commit their sex offenses against adults, rape for instance, suffer at
>the hands of inmates. Not as bad as sex offenses involving children,
>but still bad. Drunk drivers who kill children fare better than
>rapists. Talk about misplaced priorities. I think it's a much more
>serious crime if the victim isn't alive to enjoy life any longer. (And
>despite what one person harped on in an E-mail to me that sex abuse
>victims can never enjoy life any longer, most move on and find great
>joy out of life.)
>And while we're on the subject of things that could endanger
>children here's another. Before ex-sex offenders are released from
>prison they have blood taken from them for DNA matching purposes. So
>how could that endanger children you ask? Consider someone with an
>overpowering urge to have sex with children traveling to an area miles
>from where anybody knows him. He does his thing and the child is
>released physically unharmed after having his or her genitals licked on
>or whatever. Except for leaving his DNA behind there would be no way to
>catch him. Now take the same offender aware of the power of DNA.
>Knowing he left microscopic evidence behind on the child's body that
>could be easily collected this offender, wanting to take ALL possible
>steps to protect himself from arrest, would not only kill the child,
>but bury him or her well enough to where the body -- and his lingering
>DNA -- could never be found. So here we have someone with a strong sex
>urge that can only be satisfied by being with a child. (And believe me,
>I've met enough of these kinds of people in prison so I know how they
>think.) Where once this person took the extra step of merely traveling
>miles away to commit his crime with little risk, now with the power of
>DNA he is forced to not only kill the person, but to totally dispose of
>the body so it could never be found. (Burning it up would also destroy
>any lingering DNA.) I'm sure most of you never thought that forcing us
>to give DNA could endanger children more so, but do you see that it can
>in some cases?
>Now just so you Meganites know, I believe in protecting children
>too. (I think its despicable to injure children in ANY way, including
>beating them down emotionally with words that hurt and impairing their
>self esteem.) I just have a more real-world idea of how to do a better
>job of it. You see, I think like the criminal thinks (after all, I
>lived with them for a couple years in prison), and it's the criminal
>you want to protect your kids from. While both our roads lead toward
>the same destination in wanting to protect people -- yours being
>children, mine being ex-sex offenders -- the vehicles and routes for
>getting there are about as diverse and numerous as there are people to
>met them out. And that could be where a problem lies. One thing I try
>to impress upon readers quite heavily here is that before the judicial
>system engages in certain actions that may be unfavorable to ex-sex
>offenders in some way, they need to think through all the liabilities
>they may be setting up for themselves -- be they legal ones or illegal
>ones. If there's any lesson to be learned in all this mess it's that,
>despite what crime we may have done, if you want US to treat society
>fairly once we're released from custody, then you've got to take that
>FIRST pro-active step beginning on day one of our arrest, continuing
>right on through to our last day on probation or parole supervision,
>and then on into the future as we live within society among other
>law-abiding people. If they choose to play by less than the rules of
>the road, then they dare not have a right to complain if we respond in
>a like fashion. Sir Isaac Newton's third law of motion, "for every
>action there is an equal and opposite reaction" applies forcefully in
>various areas of our lives, even beyond the realm of the typical
>physicist in the laboratory -- and in some cases, the reaction of the
>antagonized ex-sex offender has exceeded the action in many instances
>as well it should. Like a dog eventually bites back if he's kicked too
>many times, in a similar analogy, guilty culprits should not continue
>their misbehavior and not expect to get bitten eventually. Tread
>lightly folks! Do that and my job is done. It's high time we stopped
>making excuses for those who attack ex-sex offenders and stop giving
>these attackers lenient treatment just because the victim was an ex-sex
>offender. If we have to organize ourselves in much larger ways like
>blacks did several decades ago in order to get a fair shake out of
>society we can surely do it, and we can step on some toes in the
>process.
>
>There's one more service I need to provide to ex-sex offenders
>currently in prisons throughout the country. Back when I was in it was
>the white tattooed doper biker kinds of guys that were the most hostile
>to us. And from what I'm hearing from today's recently released ex-sex
>offenders it's much worse. First of all skinheads are added to the mix.
>Today, if these scumbags have the slightest suspicion that a newly
>arrived inmate is an ex-sex offender -- or "baby raper" as they call us
>-- they demand to see some of his legal papers in order to prove he
>isn't. And if he doesn't show them he either has to check himself into
>protective custody or be subject to getting beaten up. Sometimes an
>inmate's personal property doesn't arrive until a few days later so
>these convicts -- which is a term they prefer over inmate --
>"graciously" give the "suspect" some extra time to show his papers or
>else. What I'm offering to ex-sex offenders in prison, or those out on
>bail and anticipating going to prison, is making up fictitious papers
>containing a more "politically correct" crime on it. These papers are
>not for staff of course. They've got your real paperwork and know what
>you're really in for. These papers are just to show to those nosy
>scumbag inmates you're sure to run into. Click here (not available
>here) to see a 6-page sample of what "John Doe" did to get into prison.
>It will open up in a new window. Once you're done just close that
>window and you'll be right back here. While these sample pages are
>graphic images, the real file was created with Microsoft Word and I can
>modify it quite easily. I would be more than happy to make up these
>papers with whatever names, dates, and crimes anyone wants and I'll
>print them out and send them directly to the inmate at my expense. Some
>of the names are more important than others. For instance, any name can
>be used for the court reporter, defense attorney, or deputy district
>attorney. But for the head District Attorney make sure you get me the
>right name. Notice this sample has Ira Reiner as the District Attorney.
>If I was to make these papers up with a recent crime I would need to
>use the current District Attorney's name. Failing to do so would be a
>dead give away to the scumbags who would likely know the correct name.
>Legal papers in other states probably have their own distinctive look
>that may be quite different than these. If necessary, take a picture of
>the pages you need and send them to me as an E-mail attachment so I can
>match up the necessary format. If I can help one ex-sex offender from
>getting beaten up by these hostile inmates I hate so much I've done
>some good. Unfortunately, there may be another problem though. Some
>states that list ex-sex offenders on the internet include not only
>those who have been released, but also those who are still in prison.
>Seeing that hostile inmates can easily get friends or family members on
>the outside to check up on other inmates, having these fake papers may
>be no help. Time will tell how serious of a problem this is. I do hope
>though that if any inmate is seriously injured or killed on account of
>being on an internet database that his friends or family members will
>avenge it to such an extent that it will get the attention of lawmakers
>to get inmates off the databases immediately.
>And while we're talking about databases, I would suggest that each
>of you released ex-sex offenders listed on the internet keep a hefty
>kitchen knife by your front door. That way, if some asshole shows up to
>harass you you can deal with him in an appropriate way. I would suggest
>buying a used knife at a thrift store that is different than any your
>household has. That way, your story can be the guy showed up with a
>knife and attacked you and you fought over it and won. Be sure to drag
>the body into your house to bolster your story that he burst in and
>attacked you. I believe killing him is an appropriate outcome even if
>he is only harassing you. After all, he may be merely harassing you
>this time. But he'll surely be more hostile next time, or the time
>after that. Catch him off guard and you'll never have to worry about
>that one again. Remember, C Y A comes first. Alternately, you could
>dump the body in the desert or a garbage dumpster and that way you
>don't have to be involved at all. The thing is though, your DNA will
>surely be left behind. Gasoline dumped on the body and ignited will
>take care of that problem real quick. Obviously, having a good solid
>knife meant for defending yourself would be better, but such a knife
>may be a violation of your parole or probation to have. I've never
>heard complaints about kitchen utensils -- including knives. Why a used
>knife? I'm not totally sure, I just think it would be less suspicious
>than a guy showing up with a brand new knife. Seems more likely he'd
>show up with something he already has.
>
>There are very definite ways to take on the pro-Meganite community
>and win. It's called revenge. But it can ONLY be done by a team effort.
>We all have a natural power to even up a score. Unfortunately, too many
>of us are under-employing this great tool of justice. Abusive things
>only happen to us because WE allow them to happen. It's because of us
>that the swamp in which these people breed is allowed to continue in
>existence. If we all band together and avenge EVERY Megan's Law
>misconduct they would surely be on notice to mind their P's and Q's. I
>once heard an ex-convict griping about what had happened to him then
>said, "you can't beat the judicial system." Beat is a relative term.
>You can sure aggravate them and that's a moderate win in my book. It's
>time we take our power back. Let's do it -- now! Remember, this is no
>time to have a conscious. We can always get back in that mode once
>things are back to normal. But for right now, war is war. C Y A comes
>first! And that's as it SHOULD be.
>It's quite likely we'll face some obstacles and setbacks in the
>months and years to come as the foes of freedom and fairness in this
>country work even harder to deny us our rights. But realize this --
>theirs is a loosing battle. It has to be; one way or another. As we've
>witnessed in other great civil rights movements, once people realize
>that freedom and equality are within their reach, there is no turning
>back the tide of change.
>Well that's about it. But before I send you off to my child
>database here's a couple final thoughts to chew on. People become
>desensitized to the violation of civil rights for a non-favored group
>if the violations happen so regularly that they seem normal and
>therefore morally right. Worse yet, these abuses are often defended by
>people in high political positions who consider themselves enlightened
>and progressive. As we will see, there is -- and well should be -- a
>hidden price to these kinds of practices. This is based on objectifying
>us, treating us as objects. Objectification of us means seeing us as
>less than human. It is hurtful; it limits humanity of all people trying
>to have decent relationships; it makes the world less safe for your
>friends and loved ones, because people who see us as objects instead of
>as people are less hesitant to do us harm.
>For the status quo Meganites out there -- watch your toes; not
>every activated ex-sex offender may tread lightly! Consider yourselves
>informed, advised citizens and proceed with caution. For my fellow
>ex-sex offenders -- stay the course like a tenacious junk-yard dog and
>lay one hell of a wake. Now, let the games begin! I just love it when a
>plan comes together. : - ) Good luck.
>
>P.S. And don't you forget my disclaimer (***disclaimer***). I am NOT
>encouraging these actions -- I only speak favorably about them and
>would LIKE to see them happen. Our Constitution allows me to say that
>whether you like it or not. Now go take on the day!
>
>To access my child database click here. (***child entry***)
>
>
>Warmest regards,
>Sam
>SAM (ex-Sex Offenders Against Megan's Law)
>
>
>And just in case you need more encouragement to fight back click here
>(***sam2***).
>This Page Last Modified: Sunday, October 31, 2004
>
>
>
>
>***sam2***
>
>What is so bad is that for the last few years, many of us have
>just put up with this belittling kind of behavior as if it were normal.
>Sometimes slogans, images, platitudes, and half-truths make us accept
>the political and social status quo as natural. Ideology blinds us to
>material circumstances. It may have seemed normal that inequality is an
>unalterable law of human life. This doctrine is, of course, false.
>There is a perception among the general public, fueled by media reports
>sponsored by politicians, that Megan's Law must be more firmly
>established. Our viewpoint, obviously, differs here too. This
>perception operates on the level that the general public genuinely
>believes that the more Megan's Law is in effect, the safer they will be
>in the long run. Our ideas may be intimidating to the general public,
>and even annoying, but like most new things, they're really neutral.
>While these ideas are new to many, they aren't to those of us who have
>lived through some of the crap we have. They're bound to upset many
>because we have no context to discuss such things -- no other reference
>of similar abuse so actively has ever been spoken about with such
>vigor. We must never be silenced again -- NO MATTER WHAT! Silence is
>NOT golden -- speak out, act out, fight back; and don't let ANYONE
>screw you over!
>People become desensitized to the violation of civil rights for a
>non-favored group if the violations happen so regularly that they seem
>normal and therefore morally right. Worse yet, these abuses are often
>defended by people in high political positions who consider themselves
>enlightened and progressive. As we will see, there is -- and well
>should be -- a hidden price to these kinds of practices.
>Tragically, some of these officials have been known to do
>something for self-interest reasons, that is actually less good or
>beneficial for society in general, than our actions have been. In some
>cases they have been down right wrong -- morally and/or legally. Then
>when discovered, they may be given a mere slap on the wrist in relation
>to what one of us would be given for doing something of a nearly
>equivalent nature or, more tragically, some of these scoundrels are
>even immune from criminal prosecution altogether. (And judges can't
>even be sued in civil court for their official actions. For federal
>judges, they can't even be fired.) Then there are the times that there
>is so much support for some kinds of actions of behavior that everyone
>is literally blinded to the fact of how wrong and damaging these things
>really are. Why does the judicial heart have so many dark places? I
>wonder how some people can sleep at night. There's got to be a better
>way, they're not that inept. These kinds of actions are reflective of
>what I would deem an increasingly simplistic attitude toward the real
>world. Perhaps the issue of apathy should be examined more closely.
>
>If we don't demand what we know is right, no one is going to give
>it to us. Black slaves had to band together and by doing so they were
>freed. We too must band together and no longer let anyone rip us off.
>If enough of us speak out, we can stop the abuse. If we all have the
>same response for our perpetrator(s) they will then have to comply. We
>just NEED to stick together. By lack of protest we tacitly support
>these kinds of actions. Silence from us is interpreted as though we
>approve of our treatment and that is surely not the message we want to
>send. With strong support we can bring real pressure upon others to
>maintain a reasonable level of fairness and propriety.
>Reaching our ultimate goal will require bold and even somewhat
>unorthodox steps. Sometimes it is the unorthodox that advances our
>civilization. We must all do our part to enlighten and educate those
>less informed that fairness is on a continuum with the best interests
>for ALL concerned.
>
>When I saw the movies SPEED and BLOWN AWAY with some friends, who
>just happened to be ex-convicts, a few years ago some of them were
>particularly intrigued with the techniques involved, one especially
>when he heard a bomb could be made with baking soda. And in the movie
>THE SPECIALIST with Sylvester Stallone in 1994 they liked and cheered
>the revenge aspect of each act of explosive vengeance. How many of us
>disgruntled ex-sex offenders have the particular psychological profile
>of a bomber or serial something? How many of us are far enough from
>that point but become closer after getting kicked in the teeth over and
>over by the judicial system? Think about it folks! Is this Megan's Law
>crap really protecting society or is it just delaying an explosive
>outcome a few years down the line when it can have time to gain
>strength? Doesn't defusing it earlier make more sense? Think, think
>hard folks. Is what I'm saying beginning to sink in a little bit?
>And when us ex-convicts found out that the bombing of the federal
>building in Oklahoma City on April 19, 1995 was in retaliation for the
>government's attack upon the compound at Waco, Texas some of us were
>especially happy. Like Rush Limbaugh said after the bombing, "such a
>wake-up call this is." Truer words have never been spoken. While such
>disasters are a tragedy, the government has to be aware that when they
>continually screw people over and over without any amount of acceptance
>of responsibility things such as these are going to happen from time to
>time. It's just the law of averages, probabilities; and that's one law
>no one can break. Yes, there were innocent victims of that bombing.
>However, it was OUR government's aggression that drew first blood and
>forced such a tragic event. Regrettable as it was, such consequences
>should serve as a warning to the judicial system. We won't stand for
>any more Wacos or Ruby Ridges -- period!
>
>Too often, authorities are at a loss to explain what brought the
>lashing out to the surface in the first place, and are then surprised
>when they are told what caused it. It's hard to believe they can do
>some of these things without expecting some repercussions. It's as if
>they ACTUALLY expect us to just accept them as normal. The current crop
>of political officials, judicial personnel, and those tough-minded
>Meganite people seem to be the only ones who are totally blind to the
>fact that retribution is quite likely to occur in some instances. In
>fact, in a way, revenge is much like the weather -- it inevitably
>affects our lives whether we like it or not. Truly, politicians and the
>general public are short-sighted in endorsing these current policies.
>They are a far more costly alternative than is necessary. Obviously,
>they should be thoroughly reconsidered. A realistic analysis of all the
>costs involved -- including those of revenge -- would likely show that
>the attractions of such harsh treatments or other abuses are more
>apparent than real. This HAS to be factored into the loop and
>considered before any more actions are taken. An ounce of prevention is
>worth a pound of cure -- AND THAT'S THE TRUTH!
>It's also hard to understand how they can consider themselves
>proud Americans when they allow things like this to happen. Like I said
>before, Sir Isaac Newton's third law of motion, "For every action there
>is an equal and opposite reaction" applies forcefully in various areas
>of our lives, even beyond the realm of the typical physicist in the
>laboratory -- and sometimes, the reaction has exceeded the action. Like
>a dog eventually bites back if he's kicked too many times, in a similar
>analogy, guilty culprits should not continue their misbehavior and not
>expect to get bitten eventually. What goes around, comes around. They
>put it out; you throw it on back. Give them a taste of their own
>medicine. Two wrongs may not make a right, but it can sure make some
>people FEEL better. Revenge sure helps clean out the cobwebs -- it
>considerably lowers the anger level, it levels the playing field, it
>puts us all on a more even keel. Seemingly powerless people are not so
>powerless any more. And I speak from personal experience on this.
>Revenge lets you sneak in the back door when the welcome mat is not out
>on justice's front porch. We all need to confront those who profess
>injustice and I'll proclaim that until the day I die.
>
>Protecting society is important, but of equal concern should be
>how will the person act upon release from confinement. Average people
>must understand that harsh punishments and/or any other kinds of abuse
>afterwards can magnify the problem by having the opposite of the hoped
>for effect for some people. A short-sided view of eliminating criminal
>activity only while the person is in custody or on post-release
>supervision should take a back seat to the broader and wiser view of a
>positive decision that will aid the person in really wanting to be
>law-abiding for the REST OF HIS OR HER LIFE. What is in the best
>interest of the ex-convict must be equated to what is in the best
>interest of society, for only with including both equally is justice
>really served.
>
>Some compare the desire or need to seek some kind of revenge is
>like an itch that needs to be scratched eventually. One way or the
>other they can go only so long before they have to just reach up and
>scratch the heck out of it, even more intensely if you let it go and
>tried to just ignore it.
>
>It's noteworthy that some smarter professionals aren't even
>surprised when violent outbreaks happen. When three doctors got shot at
>the Los Angeles County U.S.C. Medical Center in February 1993 by a man
>who admits to being screwed over and over, hospital workers and even
>one of the wounded doctors said they expected it to happen because they
>knew how people were getting screwed over. The tragic thing is they
>neglected to correct the circumstances that led to their own destiny.
>Must the pro Megan's Law people follow the same pathway? Can they be so
>stupid to ignore they are sitting on a powder keg primed and ready to
>blow? And who will be to blame when it does? Let's make sure the
>shooter isn't the only one to get all the blame. In fact, in many cases
>like this, he or she only deserves maybe 10% of the total blame. Make
>sure the 90% gets to where it belongs.
>
>Many people who have been irritated enough by "the system" find it
>quite satisfying to cost them financially, aggravate, and/or even just
>inconvenience them in some way. Some of us, in increasing numbers, are
>of the opinion that in these times of budget deficits and tight
>spending, it is likely that if there were to transpire a widespread
>wrath of very costly revenge (hitting them in their pocketbooks) and/or
>revenge designed to inconvenience a multitude of people involved with
>the judicial system, by a sizable number of people who have been abused
>and/or treated unfairly, some changes inevitably would quickly come
>about. Just remember, politics and money are truly familiar bedfellows.
>
>If you've been knocked around once too many times a revenger lives
>within you. He sits and stews most days, biding his time, when he
>occasionally gets to stretch his limbs into yours and laugh the wild,
>crazy laugh of adrenaline as he finally gets to settle a score. You
>know him, although perhaps you're wary of his power and like to
>consider yourself too mature and responsible for his regular company.
>But he cannot be ignored. He must be walked, and he must be fed.
>Otherwise, he'll make you a wreak. The settlement processes listed
>within this Web site are his. Non-violent (mostly) ways to cost,
>aggravate, and/or inconvenience others who has earned your heartfelt
>contempt. They're vicarious opportunities for you to get to know him
>better. They're a nudge, a not-too-subtle elbow in the ribs, to
>surrender to his adventurous wryings and live life at another level.
>Your revenger within is restless. Unleash him. Outdoors. NOW!
>
>It is again emphasized, this Web site does not encourage breaking
>laws. That issue is left up to each person to decide. Our goal is to
>encourage abusive Meganites to change their ways. Most will agree it is
>better to look for a law-abiding course of action to resolve one's
>impulses and inclinations than it is to resort to law-breaking
>behavior. Realistically though, we realize some are not able to.
>
>If you have contempt, hatred, animosity, spite, and/or disgust for
>some unfair acting person, group of people, or judicial organization,
>now is the time to jump on the bandwagon. Now is the time to lay the
>groundwork to sensitize others to the plight we face. Have the courage
>of your convictions. If you really believe in something; ACT upon it.
>Don't walk away from a battle on principle. The time has come for us to
>branch out. We need a rebellion. We need an uprising similar to the
>civil rights' movement of the 1960s. If enough of us takes offense and
>acts upon it something can be done. More of us need to take these
>abuses on a personal level. The few of us currently involved in
>counteracting them are not enough. We must be conscious of our own
>united strength, because until we become so, we can never rebel. We
>need to breed awareness to save ourselves. If we chose to unite and
>fight today, we'd have so much pressure on our abusers that they would
>be forced to use alternative methods of behavior more conductive to
>fairness. Collectively as a group, we need only to rise up and act;
>together we can change what we cannot -- or should not have to --
>accept. Keep in mind that abusive practices are most often ONLY changed
>when challenged. Let's not be beaten down by the bureaucracy any
>longer. Let us VICTIMS show that we will NOT tolerate it EVER again
>from irresponsible people who are suppose to know better. If they keep
>trying to shove that crap down your throat that you have to take it,
>let them know you're the wrong person to screw over or rip off! Punch
>holes in their kind of reasoning. Pop their bubble. Let them know
>you're as mad as hell and you won't take it any longer! Give them their
>wake-up call. Emphasize the issues of economics, which sway votes of
>every town council and county supervisor, to anyone who will look bad
>if our responses happen. Let them know a little consideration now may
>be a small cost to pay for the safety of society as a whole later. This
>stance or attitude says, "don't mess with me." It looks at the reality
>of the situation and deals with it straight on. Now is the time to use
>the only weapon we have. Figuratively (and literally if possible) wave
>a scolding finger in their faces. If it's done efficiently they'll wish
>they had acted properly and when you reach that level of understanding
>you'll know that you've won. You won't feel helpless any more. You
>won't be a victim any more.
>
>All that us people who have been abused and/or somehow treated
>unfairly need to do for these people to succeed is to do nothing. No
>one can do everything, but each of us can do something. Each of us
>counts. We live in the society we allow to continue. Just sitting back
>and doing nothing isn't good enough any more. If you're not part of the
>solution, you're part of the problem. First, as people interested in
>Megan's Law reform, we need to recognize our common goal and take the
>necessary steps to achieve it. We need to help others like ourselves
>understand the importance of these issues. We need to take active steps
>to safeguard each of us victims from the moment the abuse is first
>afflicted upon us until its last and final vestiges are resolved to our
>satisfaction. We need to create appropriate restrictions on our abusers
>in order to limit the damage these insensitive folks are capable of
>creating. We need to spotlight the absurdities in the Meganites'
>thinking if we are ever going to have a chance at eliminating them.
>Whatever you/we do, don't leave it to the other guy. We cannot wait for
>others to solve the problem for us; there isn't enough time for that.
>We NEED action now! The inequalities and injustices can be changed. We
>all have it within our power to make it better for us, or at least keep
>it from getting worse. With unity, this can be accomplished. We won't
>always succeed -- but unless we try, we can't POSSIBLY succeed. Just
>remember, these things happen to us because WE allow them to happen. WE
>have the ultimate responsibility to determine our fate. If we're going
>to keep on getting abused, it's on us for allowing it! Remember that
>folks.
>
>
>Now if you're FINALLY ready for my child database click here (***child
>entry***).
>This Page Last Modified: Tuesday, April 6, 2004
>
>
>
>
>
>***disclaimer***
>
>DISCLAIMER:
>Every attempt has been made to avoid violating the law in all wording
>contained on this Web site. All such statements I make are to be
>considered conditional statements. Conditional on the assumption that
>they are legal to say without breaking any laws. If I slip up, meaning
>the condition has not been met, consider them not only inadvertent and
>immediately withdrawn as if they never existed in the first place --
>but also not stated. My specific intention is to obey the law in all
>writings contained on this site. Due to the complexities of our legal
>system though, I could conceivably write something I do not know is
>illegal. If so, consider it inadvertent and corrected as soon as I
>become aware of it.
>
>The incidents depicted on this site are for entertainment, amusement,
>and protective purposes only. They are in no way intended to be other
>than educational and/or instructional. They are not portrayed with the
>intent of helping to promote methods, actions, or devices which assist
>others in breaking the law. This is not a handbook to be used as a
>guide meant to be put into practical use. It does not encourage
>breaking laws. Each individual has the responsibility to make up his or
>her own mind as to whether or not to do so, or even how far they wish
>to go to even a score, if they in their own mind of their free will
>even choose to do so at all. Likewise, this material is not advising,
>recommending, inducing, counseling, commanding, cajoling, organizing,
>procuring, soliciting, aiding, abetting, instigating, inciting,
>enticing, assisting, promoting, teaching, endorsing, or advocating
>anyone to break any laws, produce imminent lawless action, or willfully
>cause the commission of any offense or crime. It is not treasonous and
>is against the overthrow of the government and anyone who endeavors to
>persuade anyone to engage in such conduct. It merely is actively
>against the abusive actions of certain members employed by, or working
>on behalf of, that government. Nothing here is intended to obstruct
>justice in any way. On the contrary, our goal is merely to bring REAL
>justice for all concerned. Nor is any conspiracy taking place as
>defined by conspiracy laws as no one is together agreeing to cooperate
>or engage in criminal activity together. I'm merely reporting as an
>author. Not encouraging, but merely "suggest" what "should" be done,
>and sometimes, "actively suggest" what others "should" do. "Speak
>favorably" is a term I like to use. The author disclaims any
>responsibility for all liability and/or damages. Although this site
>does mention some rather extreme resolution techniques, the author
>expressly disclaims responsibility for any adverse effects arising from
>the use of techniques described within. Neither the author nor the
>publisher assumes any responsibility for the use or misuse of
>information contained on this site or for any infringements of rights
>of third parties that may arise from the use of any information on this
>site or from the ideas portrayed in its stories. I assume no
>responsibility for the readers' performance or actions or behavior
>towards any of the actions and/or deeds mentioned herein and shall not
>be held liable for any direct or indirect damages resulting from their
>use. Under no circumstances, including negligence, will the author or
>the publisher assume any liabilities, or be liable to anyone, for any
>incidental, special, or consequential damages of any kind that may
>result from the information contained herein, its use, or non-use, even
>if the writer has been advised of the possibly of such damages. It is
>distributed for entertainment purposes only. Be warned.
>The publication of dirty tricks such as these should not be construed
>as prima facie evidence that the author supports or condemns the ideas
>therein, in whole or part, nor that those ideas represent the personal
>views of the author IN ALL CASES. Freedom of the press in this country
>was founded on the concept of the citizenry making informed decisions
>through an open marketplace of ideas. May the best ideas win.
>Although it's conceivable someone could pick up an idea or two to help
>themselves quell an anger, it is no different from a person watching a
>crime television show and picking up an idea or two on how to
>accomplish a crime. If that were illegal, many shows would be off the
>air.
>While encouraging someone to break the law is illegal, it is not
>illegal to have a personal belief and/or opinion about a matter and how
>one would LIKE to see someone handle it, or even WISH someone would
>handle it. There is nothing unconstitutional or illegal about
>expressing opinions we may have in a free enterprise democratic system.
>This is the United States of America where the First Amendment of our
>Constitution allows us to have our own opinions and beliefs. This site
>is filled with opinions and beliefs of not only the author, but of
>other people confidentially interviewed in the process of research.
>Although I personally don't intend to do some of the imaginative antics
>contained within, I honestly do believe that such things can stir up
>the pro Megan's Law community -- and it's sure time something does! And
>as I have been known to say in the past, "nothing fixes a situation
>better than a well thought out, aggravation inducing, non-violent
>revenge played to the max." I love it when a plan comes together. : - )
>
>CAUTION: This Web site could prove disturbing to your peace of mind if
>you are a supporter of Megan's Law or a friend or family member of
>someone who is. Should you fit in the above category, the author
>assumes no responsibility for your predictable discomfort. Tread
>lightly! : - (
>Conversely, if you're an ex-sex offender, this Web site is bound to
>bring a chuckle to your belly. Enjoy! : - )
>This Page Last Modified: Tuesday, April 6, 2004
>
>
>
>
>***links***
>
>*PRO MEGAN'S LAW WEB SITES*
>National Sex Offender Registries Web sites:
>http://www.state.ma.us/sorb/Links_page.htm
>State Sex Offender Registry Web Sites:
>http://www.fbi.gov/hq/cid/cac/states.htm
>Registered Sex Offenders (Megan's Law) (California):
>http://caag.state.ca.us/megan/index.htm
>parents for megan's law (megan's law clearinghouse):
>http://www.parentsformeganslaw.com/
>Legislation (Megan's Law in All 50 States):
>http://www.meganslaw.org/
>Child Abuse Legislation Study Project Sex Offender
>Registries:
>
>http://www.childabuselegislation.org/calsp_li08.htm
>Child Abuse Legislation Study Project:
>http://www.childabuselegislation.org/
>The Megan Nicole Kanka Foundation:
>http://www.megannicolekankafoundation.org/
>KlassKids Foundation:
>http://www.klaaskids.org/
>Danielle Legacy Foundation:
>http://www.daniellelegacy.org/
>What's Happening at Child Watch of North America:
>http://www.childwatch.com/ChildWatchNews.htm
>California Sex Offenders:
>http://www.sexoffenders.net/
>L A County Sex Offender Locations:
>http://gismap.co.la.ca.us/sols/default.htm
>San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department:
>http://www.co.san-bernardino.ca.us/Sheriff/
>Megans-Law.net:
>http://www.megans-law.net/
>www.sexoffender.com:
>http://www.sexoffender.com/
>and
>http://www.sexoffender.com/state.html
>childabuse.com:
>http://www.childabuse.com/
>Sex Offender Notification and Registration Laws:
>http://www.unt.edu/cjus/sxcrms.htm
>corrections.com (The Official Home of Corrections) (Sex
>Offenders):
>
>http://www.corrections.com/links/viewlinks.asp?Cat=27
>SexCriminals.com:
>http://www.sexcriminals.com/
>Child Sexual Abuse:
>http://www.childsexualabuse.com/
>Pedowatch.org:
>http://www.pedowatch.org/
>JuliePosey.com:
>http://www.julieposey.com/
>Project Kid Safe:
>http://www.projectkidsafe.org/
>ProtectKids.com (Donna Rice Hughes):
>http://www.protectkids.com/
>Enough is Enough (Donna Rice Hughes):
>http://www.enough.org/
>VCA (Vanished Children's Alliance):
>http://www.vca.org/
>ProtectEveryChild.org:
>http://www.protecteverychild.org/
>Protect-The-Kids.org:
>http://www.Protect-The-Kids.org/
>National Association to Protect Children:
>http://www.careact.org/
>M.O.M. (MOTHERS OVER MURDERERS):
>http://www.themompetition.org/
>Children's Defense Fund (LEAVE NO CHILD BEHIND):
>http://www.childrensdefense.org/
>Child Lures Prevention (Kenneth Wooden):
>http://www.childlures.org/
>MEMORIES TO MARCH FOR:
>http://www.memoriestomarchfor.org/
>Safeguarding Our Children-United Mothers (SOC-UM
>Organization):
>http://www.soc-um.org/
>PANdora's Box (The Secrecy of Child Sexual Abuse [Dr. Nancy
>Faulkner]):
>http://www.prevent-abuse-now.com/index.htm
>and
>http://www.prevent-abuse-now.com/register.htm
>CyberAngels.org:
>http://www.cyberangels.org/
>Internet Child Safety Alliance:
>http://www.internetchildsafety.org/
>Child Safe NETWORK:
>http://childsafenetwork.org/
>Child Search Ministries:
>http://www.childsearch.org/
>Pedophiles: Eliminate These Predators and Parasites!:
>
>http://groups.msn.com/PedophilesEliminateThesePredatorsandParasites/inmemoryofmegankrankaampmeganslawvigil.msnw
>National Center for Missing & Exploited Children:
>http://www.missingkids.com/
>and
>http://www.missingkids.com/cybertip/
>and
>http://www.cybertipline.com/
>Predator-Hunter.com:
>http://predator-hunter.com/
>WEB OF JUSTICE (Sex Offender and Sexual Predator Links):
>
>http://www.co.pinellas.fl.us/bcc/juscoord/esexoffend.htm
>Perverted Justice:
>http://www.perverted-justice.com/
>The Lost Child (The Bad Guys - Predators):
>http://www.lostchild.net/predator.htm
>ACPO (ANTICHILDPORNORG):
>http://www.antichildporn.org/
>ChildPredators.com:
>http://www.childpredators.com/
>CSOM (Center for Sex Offender Management):
>http://www.csom.org/
>National Sex Offender Registry:
>http://connsacs.org/library/soregist.html
>Code Amber (The Web's Amber Alter System):
>http://www.codeamber.org/
>MoVA (Missouri Victim Assistance Network [SEX OFFENDER
>REGISTRIES/STATE REGISTRY INFORMATION]):
>http://mova.missouri.org/txtreg.htm
>SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY Information Center:
>http://www.crimetime.com/sex_offender.htm
>STOP Sex Offenders:
>http://www.stopsexoffenders.com/
>National Alert Registry:
>http://www.nationalalertregistry.com/
>This Page Last Modified: Sunday, October 31, 2004
>
>
>
>
>***child entry***
>
>Here's where we all have a chance to fight back and turn this
>Megan's Law crap into something they never even dreamed of. My goal
>here is to get as many children in as many states as possible
>registered. And that's where YOU -- my fellow ex-sex offenders -- come
>in. I can't do it alone. Go out into your neighborhoods -- and even
>other neighborhoods -- and collect as much information as you can on
>the children you run across. If all the information I ask for isn't
>known just send what you can get. Approximate locations like 1500 block
>on Main Street is fine if you can't pin down an exact address. None of
>the entry fields are required to be filled in. Some of the fields are
>pull-down menus which you access by clicking their little arrows to
>make a selection. When you click the <Submit Your Entry> button at the
>bottom of this page any data you enter will be sent to me. You're
>welcome to provide your own name and E-mail address if you wish, but
>you're also free not to.
>This data is sent to me by way of an E-mail message rather than a
>more-advanced method of sending data from a Web page which uses
>something called a CGI (which is not supported by my Web service
>provider). That said, some operating system/browser combinations do not
>support sending data from Web page forms using this less-advanced
>method. If you experience that problem please send your child entry
>info in a regular E-mail. Additionally, for different reasons some
>public-access computers you may come across, such as at libraries or
>internet cafes, may not be set up to send this information when you
>click the <Submit Your Entry> button. Sending the information in a
>regular E-mail using a Web-based service such as
>http://www.hotmail.com, http://mail.yahoo.com, or one of the many other
>free services out there will get the information to me with no problem.
>If you do send the information to me using a regular E-mail click here
>(see below) first to bring up a plain-text version of this entry form
>in a new window. Select all of the text on that page (Command-A on a
>Mac, Control-A on a PC), copy all of the text on that page (Command-C
>on a Mac, Control-C on a PC), close that window, click here to
>pre-address an E-mail message to me, paste your copied text into the
>body of the message (Command-V on a Mac, Control-V on a PC), fill in
>the blanks, and then click the <Send> button. If the computer you are
>using (public-access computer users please note) doesn't support
>pre-addressing an E-mail to me when the above link is clicked on do it
>manually using my E-mail address (xxxxx@xxxxx.com) and put Child Info
>in the Subject line. There's always a work around.
>I would also like to add a photo of the child to the database --
>after all, some states publish our photos on the internet. This Web
>page form does not support sending a photo as an attachment. Therefore,
>if you have a photo please send it in a regular E-mail as an
>attachment. Any format is okay -- I can convert it to what Web browsers
>require.
>Together we can make a difference. Remember, these things happen
>to us ONLY because WE allow them to happen. If we all band together in
>a show of solidarity we can nip this Megan's Law crap in the bud before
>it gets any worse. Getting me child information is one step... Let's
>get busy!
>
>(Here is the information I ask for in the plain-text version of my
>entry form:)
>
>Ex-Sex Offender Child Database Entry Form
>-----------------------------------------
>
>Copy all the text on this page, paste it into an E-mail,
>fill in the blanks, and then click <Send>
>
>
>Child Information
>
>First Name:
>
>Last Name:
>
>Address Line 1:
>
>Address Line 2:
>
>City:
>
>State:
>
>Zip/Postal Code:
>
>Home Phone Number:
>
>E-mail Address:
>
>School:
>
>Sex (Boy or Girl):
>
>Date Of Birth:
>
>Age (Exact or Best Guess):
>
>Race (White, Hispanic, American Indian, Black, Asian, or Other):
>
>Today's Date:
>
>Physical Description:
>
>
>
>
>
>-----------------------------------------------------
>Your Information
>
>First Name:
>
>Last Name:
>
>E-mail Address:
>
>
>
>
>Well there you have it. Pretty cool huh? Or pretty sick --
>depending on which side of the fence you fall on. In any event, it's a
>fact of life that there's hell to pay for messing with us ex-sex
>offenders. You picked the wrong people to screw over. We're organized
>and we're fighting back. GET USED TO IT!!! Anybody wishing to contact
>me can use: nomeganslaw@hotmail.com. For those supportive of my work
>feel free to send me any child information and, of course, any
>information (especially home addresses and phone numbers) on Meganites
>who actively work at making our lives more difficult in ANY way -- be
>they elected officials or just the mom down the street picketing our
>houses to get us to move. Information on these people who butt their
>asses into our law-abiding lives is as important as information on
>children. Actually getting me THEIR children is the MOST important of
>all. I love it when a plan comes together! Now go take on the day! : -
>) : - ) : - )


-- 
Ryan Lankford

Gun control is being able to hit your target. 

The Bible:  A wonderful work of fiction