Article View: triangle.general
Article #242Re: Cable TV and you
From: Gordon Keener
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 1992 17:53
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 1992 17:53
56 lines
3414 bytes
3414 bytes
In <17342@borg.cs.unc.edu> hardarso@weiss.cs.unc.edu (Kari Hardarson) writes: >[cable boxes] >Why do we need those boxes on top of our TV? They look ugly, they >consume energy even when turned off (mine is always hotter than skin >temperature) and they complicate TV watching in general. Does anyone >know if they benefit the consumer in any way? The boxes make it easier to turn on/off pay channels, because they can just program the box down the wire. They also allow a two-tier service for the other channels, by providing a tiny subset of service for a lower price while scrambling all the useful channels. BTW, I'm *glad* I don't have a box. A friend of mine in the DC area has a box because he has 2 physical cables running into his apartment. Apparently, a single coax doesn't have the bandwidth for the 110 or so channels he can get. Is this true, and if so, how could 100+ channel "cable ready" sets work anywhere? >I called my friendly cable company the other day and told them that the >picture on the Pay-per-view channels was bad - interference and such. >The answer I got was: "you may come to our office and get your cable box >exchanged". I was supposed to drive 5 miles and get another box to test >the phone operators theory that this was probably the box. What are those >vans with Cablevision logos for? Foreign spies tapping phones, perhaps? The operator probably did you a favor. All the boxes probably have problems, and they would likely charge you $35 for the honor of not doing anything, not to mention you having to be at home for them to come by "sometime Thursday". Note: heavy sarcasm intended. >While I'm on the subject of cable TV: How come the cable >company doesn't broadcast the evening program on a separate channel like >so many companies do? Instead they have been trying to get people to >subscribe to a Cable guide for 4-5$ extra a month (which only lists a subset >of the channels, i.e. not the network programs). And how come they >charge 23.50$ for *basic* service? Don't they know there's a recession? "We're the cable company. We can do anything we want." - possibly misremembered quote frm the Saturday morning "Garfield" cartoon. Actually, I was visiting the Bay area in CA in August, and things were *worse*. There were 8-10 cable companies, each with their own monopolized area, and each carried about 20-25 channels. They even stole 3 of the channels for the "Triple Cast", instead of using holes like Cablevision. I hate monopolies. BTW, I heard something second hand about the Justice Dept. not enforcing the cable bill that got Bush's only overridden veto. Does anyone have any info (or pointers to info) about this? >Ahhhhhh! That felt better! Indeed. -- Gordon Keener SAS Institute, Inc. flash@unx.sas.com SAS Campus Dr, Cary, +1 919 677 8000 NC 27513-2414 USA "There is a heppy lend, fur, fur a-wa-ay." - _Krazy_Kat_, George Herriman
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<flash.721331629@ellison>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!concert!sas!mozart.unx.sas.com!flashReferences:
<17342@borg.cs.unc.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: triangle.general Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!concert!sas!mozart.unx.sas.com!flash From: flash@unx.sas.com (Gordon Keener) Subject: Re: Cable TV and you Sender: news@unx.sas.com (Noter of Newsworthy Events) Message-ID: <flash.721331629@ellison> Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 17:53:49 GMT Distribution: nc References: <17342@borg.cs.unc.edu> Nntp-Posting-Host: ellison.unx.sas.com Organization: SAS Institute Inc. Lines: 56