Article View: triangle.general
Article #442Re: Best cellular company in triangle? (*long*)
From: Tom Cole
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 15:15
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 15:15
116 lines
6937 bytes
6937 bytes
I followed the discussion about cellular phone companies for a bit and can't resist putting in my own $.02 worth. My wife and I each have a phone, one with CellularOne and one with Centel. Based on our experiences I'll offer the following observations: o Centel does have a larger coverage region for the Triangle based region than Cellular One, i.e. you can get a signal farther out in Granville County than you can with Cellular One. However, it has been my experience that Cellular One has slightly better signal quality in the coverage areas. I believe that if you compare the cell maps for each system, Cellular One creates slightly smaller, denser cells than Centel. I think this is also corroberated somewhat by the fact that I occassionally get a "cell unavailable" message from Centel and have never gotten one from Cellular One. By this I mean I get a fast-busy connect error that clears up in a minute or two, even when I am not moving -- leading me to believe that they either have more transient transmitter problems, or have cells spread thin enough that the maximum number of open connections are active within the cell. Again, I've never had this problem with Cellular One. o Cellular One does seem to have a number of customers who had bad experiences in the past. However, in the last year or two they seem to have completely changed their billing systems, possibly as a result of the buyout (acquisition? takeover? merger?) with GTE Mobilnet. In the last two years, I've never had or heard of a significant billing or operational error, and the trivial ones seem to be corrected nearly instantly. I'd bet they are about on par with Centel at this point. o It's worth pointing out that both Centel and Cellular One offer "cheap" plans, offering next to no built-in minutes. Cellular One offers a plan for something on the order of $10 a month with no built-in minutes. They do not advertise this plan, so you have to ask for it. But it does provide a means for buying the phone and assuming zero normal use (i.e. emergencies only, etc.). As far as rates go in general, remember that cellular phone service is regulated by the State Utilities Commission. While breakover points in rate plans may vary slightly (Centel does not offer a one hour plan, for example, but does offer a 75 minute plan) the general cost of service is going to be pretty comparable at all times. As a minor point of complaint about Centel, they offer "free" voicemail as part of many of the plans. Well, Cellular One offers voicemail as well, but you pay $6.96 a month or so to have an assigned "mailbox". With Cellular One, you pay for each message left in a mailbox, at some reasonable rate. But on the face of it, the Centel deal (which also charges per message) seems better. What they don't tell you is that accessing your mailbox, even if from a regular Bell phone is charged at the current airtime rate. Even doing things like setting up your outgoing message and other non-storage based activities are charged, at rates as much as $.50 a minute. Gack. They also are pretty quiet about this, and you have to ask some questions. o There was a comment made that Centel offers automatic location functions while roaming. This is offered by Cellular One as well, but under a different name. Actually, almost all phone systems offer this, it is a nationally agreed-upon network that is shared by most but not all systems. In fact, you can be in areas of the country (or NC) where "national call delivery" doesn't work because the local system doesn't support it. o As for comments about roaming, everyone supports roaming. Both Centel and Cellular One offer "free" roaming in a variety of systems, typically ones owned by them or their parent companies. For example, I can use my Cellular One phone in the Triad area or Boone for the same rates I use it here in Cary. Centel is the same, though the list of systems you can roam in for free varies from carrier to carrier. I have never been anywhere where I couldn't use either phone, the key is who roams where at what rate. If you have a regular travel pattern (house at Topsail Beach, for instance) that might make a big difference in which system you choose. o A final comment about buying a phone for cheap. Most phones can be purchased at a reasonable price if you buy a prepackage rate plan. I know of NO "cheap" phone that doesn't sign you up for at least 30 minutes of time each month, typically more like an hour. Also, be careful of duration of contract. The standard is for one year, but you can find deals that look good until you see you must sign up for a two year or more contract. Also, be sure that you read the contract carefully, and assure yourself that the carrier cannot change the rates on your at their discretion without offering you an out on the contract. I am really in no position to offer expertise on buying phones, having not bought but two of them. From what research I did, I think that MOST phones are largely interchangable in terms of electronics quality. You are buying a) name brands, b) durability of construction, or c) fancy gadgets added to the software of the phone. I have a NEC in one car that I'm very very happy with, and a Tandy Handheld that I'm not that happy with. As a point of reference, there's nothing wrong with the Tandy except that it's a handheld. In order to avoid frying your brain completely while using it, the transmitter signal is only .6 watts. This means that there are signal quality problems when near RFI sources, and dead spots at cell boundaries that a phone with a full 3 watt transmitter doesn't suffer from. Avoid the handhelds unless you are working typically within a metropolitan area or other system with EXCELLENT cell coverage. Even then, you won't be happy. Sorry to be so long winded, these are of course just my opinions based on my own experiences. -- Tom Cole, SAS Institute Inc. VMS R&D cole@nepenthe.unx.sas.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<C19H26.A9r@unx.sas.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!concert!sas!mozart.unx.sas.com!coleReferences:
<1993Jan20.023829.4165@ncsu.edu> <C18065.EyG@unx.sas.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: triangle.general Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!concert!sas!mozart.unx.sas.com!cole From: cole@nepenthe.unx.sas.com (Tom Cole) Subject: Re: Best cellular company in triangle? (*long*) Originator: cole@nepenthe.unx.sas.com Sender: news@unx.sas.com (Noter of Newsworthy Events) Message-ID: <C19H26.A9r@unx.sas.com> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 15:15:41 GMT Distribution: triangle References: <1993Jan20.023829.4165@ncsu.edu> <C18065.EyG@unx.sas.com> Nntp-Posting-Host: nepenthe.unx.sas.com Organization: SAS Institute Inc. Lines: 117