🚀 go-pugleaf

Thomas Gauldin wrote in message <6mqvqa$ee1$1@camel29.mindspring.com>...

>I certainly agree with this.  There are circumstances where a
>strong-minded woman may marry a weak-minded or ineffective man.

Yeah?  Well, she will frustrated, and is making the worst move of her life.

>To protect the family, it may be necessary for her to take the reins.
>Likewise, if there is an illness or accident that prevents the husband
>from using his leadership right in the family, it is good to have a
>strong-minded, intelligent and educated wife as his backup.


And so it is expected, even if she bears his name.   Let's see a show
of hands.  How many guys out there want to marry a incapable woman?

I read the thread, and just have to say: BULLSHIT!!  It's pretty simple.  If
a
couple have to go to general quarters over the wife changing her name, then
they both had better look real close at the relationship.  I can understand
where,
in some cases, legalities make the use of a maiden name the smart way to go.

As for the rest of it, hey:  If the gal does not want to take his name, then
she
should not  marry him.  If she does not love, trust, and put her faith in
the guy
(if all of this is true, the name thing will be null and void), then find
another
man that makes the issue null and void.