🚀 go-pugleaf

On Fri, 25 Dec 2009 13:48:53 -0700, <raykeller@rnsmte.com> wrote:

>      This is a WorldNetDaily printer-friendly version of the article which 
>follows.
>      To view this item online, visit 
>http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?pageId=120009
>
>
>      Thursday, December 24, 2009
>
>
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
>      A VOICE OF SANITY
>      Can we still
>      save America?
>      Exclusive: Robert Ringer plans to battle
>      'most corrupt government in U.S. history'
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
>      Posted: December 25, 2009
>      1:00 am Eastern
>
>
>
>      By Robert Ringer
>
>
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>      In a 2008 radio interview, Barack Obama said:
>
>      " � the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution 
>of wealth, and of more basic issues such as political and economic justice 
>in society. To that extent, as radical as I think people try to characterize 
>the Warren Court, it wasn't that radical. It didn't break free from the 
>essential constraints that were placed by the Founding Fathers in the 
>Constitution, at least as its been interpreted and the Warren Court 
>interpreted in the same way, that generally the Constitution is a charter of 
>negative liberties."
>
>      I tell you, life isn't fair. Why hasn't the Supreme Court ever 
>ventured into the matter of "redistributive wealth?" And what in the world 
>were the Founding Fathers thinking about when they failed to broach the 
>subject?
>
>      Surely it was an oversight that they never addressed the issue of 
>taking your assets and giving them to your neighbor. Or perhaps it's just an 
>indication that George Washington, Benjamin Franklin and James Madison were 
>cold, calloused individuals who enjoyed watching people suffer.
>
>      In the same interview, Chairman Obama went on to say that the 
>Constitution "[says] what the federal government can't do to you, but 
>doesn't say what the federal government or state government must do on your 
>behalf, and that hasn't shifted � and one of the � tragedies of the civil 
>rights movement was � because the civil rights movement became so court 
>focused, I think there was a tendency to lose track of the political and 
>community organizing and activities on the ground that are able to put 
>together the actual coalition of powers through which you bring about 
>redistributive change."
>
>      Excuse me? Do on your behalf? Those stupid Founding Fathers again. 
>They didn't even think to put in the Constitution what the government must 
>do on your behalf. And what a tragedy it was that the civil rights movement 
>didn't put together the coalition of powers that could bring about 
>"redistributive change."
>
>      Forget the fact that the Constitution never mentions the 
>redistribution of anything. After all, the debate is over: We all know that 
>redistribution of wealth is the only moral way to operate a country, right?
>
>      America will go through a fundamental change in 2010 � guaranteed. 
>Either it will be fundamentally transformed into a full-fledged socialist 
>police state, then, ultimately, a communist police state, or those who still 
>believe in freedom will do whatever it takes to overthrow the oligarchy that 
>now rules over us.
>
>      If the Republicans, after winning back the House and Senate � or even 
>coming close � continue to act like a branch of the Demopublican Party and 
>ignore the Constitution, it most likely will bring into existence a third 
>party (How about the Tea Party?) that would be the first such animal of the 
>modern era that would have a legitimate shot at of winning the presidency in 
>2012.
>
>      (Column continues below)
>
>
>      But, as I have so often pointed out, the caveat is that the fascist 
>president and Congress may very well find a Chavezian reason to declare a 
>state of emergency and "postpone" the 2012 presidential election. Regardless 
>of whether that emergency is a total collapse of the U.S. economy or a 
>terrorist attack, don't be fooled. If it happens, it will be a planned event 
>by those who are now in power.
>
>      Via health care, cap and trade and other wildly unconstitutional 
>measures, BHO and the criminal Congress will assure that the economy is many 
>times worse off by next November's elections than it is now. The objective, 
>of course, is to bring people to their knees so they will have "no other 
>choice" but to look to benevolent government for help.
>
>      I believe that 20-25 percent unemployment is coming, more massive 
>bailouts of companies "too big to fail," higher taxes, government controlled 
>health care, cap and trade and, yes, jail time for those who do not obey the 
>unconstitutional edicts of the criminal class in Washington.
>
>      Could I be wrong? Sure. I thought we'd have runaway inflation and a 
>solidly entrenched police state by the mid '80s, but I underestimated the 
>sheer power of Ronald Reagan's personality � not to mention the government's 
>capacity to print fiat currency and borrow money.
>
>      Having said this, the only way that a "fundamentally transformed 
>America" can be avoided is if:
>
>        1. Free elections are held in 2010
>
>        2. Conservative Republicans sweep into power
>
>        3. Said conservative Republicans immediately began to repeal all 
>unconstitutional legislation � including government involvement in health 
>care, welfare, regulation of the environment, government involvement in 
>education � and so on.
>
>        In short, get rid of all government functions other than providing a 
>legal system for arbitrating disputes, protecting the lives and property of 
>citizens and providing for a national defense.
>
>        4. While all this is going on, those of us who are on the moral high 
>road should be prepared to spend enormous amounts of time and energy 
>educating the anesthetized, sports-crazy, entertainment-crazy, 
>vacation-crazy masses about the wonders of the free market. We must put 
>forth the effort to explain to them why liberty is the most valuable 
>commodity they can ever possess. We must help them understand that liberty, 
>not government handouts, gives them the best opportunity to achieve economic 
>freedom.
>
>      The year 2010 will be like no other in American history. It is not 
>just another Carter era of sheer stupidity and incompetence. This is the 
>real thing. This is what progressives have been working toward since the 
>days of Theodore Roosevelt. We are living through a major historical time 
>that may very well shape the destiny of the human race for centuries to 
>come � or bring about its final demise.
>
>      But cheer up � it's Christmas. Enjoy your family and the other things 
>in your life that are dear to you. Then, refreshed, come back after the 
>holiday prepared to do battle with the most corrupt government in U.S. 
>history.

Time to collapse this rotting inefficient system called the US
Government. Don't mourn it's passing but think of the future
and rebuild for what benefits American citizens. 

I like this quote from the above article:


>      The year 2010 will be like no other in American history. It is not 
>just another Carter era of sheer stupidity and incompetence. This is the 
>real thing. This is what progressives have been working toward since the 
>days of Theodore Roosevelt. We are living through a major historical time 
>that may very well shape the destiny of the human race for centuries to 
>come � or bring about its final demise.
>
Push has come to shove.

striker
>
>