🚀 go-pugleaf

Neill wrote:
> "KenStahl" <ktsahl@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:8dCCh.1190$yu.1167@fe197.usenetserver.com...
> 
>>Neill wrote:
>>
>>>"KenStahl" <ktsahl@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>news:C2lCh.2042$P75.1866@fe200.usenetserver.com...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>It isn't. I was born
>>>>straight and I have always been straight, but I have at least enough
>>>>compassion and understanding of other people that I am not offended by
>>>>someone being gay unless they are targeting children - which is
>>>>something I happen to find offensive.
>>>
>>>
>>>Then it's not even your fight, yet you're the one name calling. Get your
>>>facts straight. The sodomite movement has and will continue to target
>>>children, which is the reason they want accepted legal status, so they
> 
> can
> 
>>>march into our schools and demand equal time. Yet, you want to keep
>>>religious views out of schools. So nutters like myself will continue to
>>>fight nutters like you.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>You only fantasize that they have such desires because without some
>>fantasy like that you don't have a basis for your hatred. You certainly
>>cannot prove it is true. I'll grant that there are a certain percentage
>>of gays that do target children, but then again there are plenty of
>>straight pedophiles as well and until you can come up with a solution
>>for fathers raping daughters - which happens in alarming numbers but is
>>kept quiet because it is a "family matter" - then you are just making
>>noise about some personal pet peeve or because you had some type of
>>homosexual experience in your own past that disgusts you. I'm not saying
>>it isn't normal to have such a reaction, because to straights it is not
>>a welcome experience, but I simply maintain that if gays want to have
>>relationships with each other that's fine as long as they don't target
>>children or someone who is not gay.
>>
> 
> 
> Hehe, but that's not the case is it? Sodomites have an agenda, and it's the
> same as athiests, which is destroy god's word, or at least water it down.
> The devil hasn't been able to accomplish that in all of recorded history.
> Though he is always able to find willing accomplices. Peace.
> 
> 

There you go again, assuming there is a devil when you have no proof 
that there is such an entity and most of what you think you know about 
such a creature comes from Milton's Paradise Lost rather then any scripture.

I suppose that it is ironic that you'll never have to pay the price for 
your misplaced beliefs outside of any karmic debt that you may accrue 
along the way in deliberately teaching a falsehood knowing it to be 
false. Ultimately the experience of both believers and non-belivers who 
go through transition will be roughly similar and then after a while 
they both go through the same experience again and again until they 
learn the lessons that they really need. Funny thing about religion 
though - it always damns those who believers don't like and saves those 
who they do like. You are so willing to broadly condemn gays and yet by 
the very tenants of the xtian religion they are the very people that you 
should love in an unqualified manner. But that isn't very convenient for 
you is it?

Don't bother trying to bamboozle me with your religious rhetoric though. 
I know far more about xtian theology then you ever will and I even 
briefly studied Greek so that I could perform rudimentary translations 
of the NT myself - in fact I know the whole book better then you ever 
will. How do I know this? Because I know that you'd think twice about 
what you said above if you really understood the depths of the xtian 
belief system. Obviously you have not reached that stage yet.