🚀 go-pugleaf

"Neill" <none@nowhere.us> wrote in message 
news:JigWg.8552$UE6.3312@tornado.southeast.rr.com...
>
> "Stefan Wolfe" <nospam@edu.com> wrote in message
> news:Zx8Wg.11165$fy.10949@tornado.southeast.rr.com...
>>
>> The Corporate Branch of the US government favors the illegal importation
> of
>> low paid workers and the non-enforcement of existing statutes to address
>> immigation. This is essentially a treasonous act which significantly
> affects
>> the living standards of  large numbers of US citizens, supposedly
> protected
>> by the US Constitution, who become jobless, work at unreasonable 3rd 
>> world
>> wage criteria and as a double slap, must fund the illegal immigrants'
>> emergency room visits, tuition bills and even an increased financial
> burden
>> on law enforcement. Of course, the "Corps" get off scott free wrt all of
>> these costs. Complicit legislators and other leaders will hopefully be
>> prosecuted in years to come  after it becomes clear what damage has been
>> done. Not all members of the Republican party blindly advocate the agenda
> of
>> the Corporate Branch but they are many and voters should carefully 
>> examine
>> the immigration records and positions of all republican nominees during
> this
>> election. It is not difficult to discern if they favor the will of the
>> people or the will of their Corp contributors. Bush, a "republican", is
>> commiting treason by not doing all in his power to defend the Nation's
>> borders against illegal immigration.
>
> I hope you're not suggesting the Bush "created" the problem, or that
> democrats would do anything about the issue. I would argue the opposite.

Well Bush did say, in reference to terrorism, that those who are not part of 
the soolution are part of the problem. Bush did not create the problem...he 
lets others use his office to create such problems. Although he is not smart 
enough to grasp the depth of these problems, he is guilty of letting others 
abuse his presidential authority in matters detrimental to the interests of 
the American people. I believe the last President who did that to such an 
extent was Millard Fillmore.

> Besides getting your house painted cheaper, the real problem is one of
> funding the crackdown,

The real problem is the cost of not funding the crackdown. Pay a little now 
or a lot later.

>even though it appears this may actually be
> happening. Rather than a national debate on the issue or even a policy
> statement, it appears the administration, or INS, more specifically may be
> enforcing the law and beginning to round up illegals. The cost is the real
> issue. We can all agree on what should be done, but no one wants to pay 
> for
> it.

Several polls indicate otherwise.

>The administration may be cracking down now, with >November elections
> just weeks away, as merely an election tactic, and it will >become 
> business
> as usual after the elections, with the occasional high profile raid to 
> keep
> up appearances. What a sham of a government we have, dems and repubs 
> alike.

Truly a joke.