Article View: triangle.general
Article #901Re: NASCAR engineers never would have allowed Space Shuttles Challenger and Columbia to take off. "If that bird ain't safe, we a...
From: chefmcc
Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 05:40
Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 05:40
18 lines
2341 bytes
2341 bytes
I don't think it's Daryll, I think it's his *brother* Daryll. Do many NASCAR "engineers" have a working knowledge of jet proplusion?Trajectory, as it is related to zero gravity situations? Aren't these the same guys who *duct tape* cars back together in order to finish a race? Maybe NASCAR "engineers" (aren't they car mechanics?) could do what Daryll says but wouldn't the shuttle just turn left all afternoon? And then occassionaly hit a wall, and then the astronauts would have to fight each other back at mission control. Any way they're gonna GIT 'ER DUN! I do like his conspiracy theory though, it gets big points for originality and humor. have fun be brave Paul
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1156570825.423332.200730@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<1156544560.606000.168760@74g2000cwt.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 101acf,a26ba6fcd07026a1 X-Google-Thread: f5d40,a26ba6fcd07026a1 X-Google-Thread: 112c01,a26ba6fcd07026a1 X-Google-Thread: 10fafa,a26ba6fcd07026a1 X-Google-Thread: 10ce4b,a26ba6fcd07026a1 X-Google-Attributes: gid101acf,gidf5d40,gid112c01,gid10fafa,gid10ce4b,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: "chefmcc" <chefmcc@frontiernet.net> Newsgroups: triangle.general,alt.conspiracy,cakewalk.coffeehouse,alt.fifty-plus.friends,alt.support.stop-smoking Subject: Re: NASCAR engineers never would have allowed Space Shuttles Challenger and Columbia to take off. "If that bird ain't safe, we are going to blackflag it until it is!" Date: 25 Aug 2006 22:40:25 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 19 Message-ID: <1156570825.423332.200730@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com> References: <1156544560.606000.168760@74g2000cwt.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.101.23.100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1156570831 24229 127.0.0.1 (26 Aug 2006 05:40:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 05:40:31 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <1156544560.606000.168760@74g2000cwt.googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/0.2 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com; posting-host=66.101.23.100; posting-account=kwnHGg0AAABpdaQuMC9F_vQlJZLK1Lzb