🚀 go-pugleaf

["Followup-To:" header set to triangle.general.]
On 2004-11-01, Tom Disque <Tom.Disque@sas.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 16:33:06 -0400, Gary L. Burnore
><gburnore@databasix.com> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 20:30:59 GMT, Gregorio.NC@gmail.com (Gregor)
>>wrote:
>>
>>>Gary L. Burnore <gburnore@databasix.com>   wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 09:49:42 -0700, "Curt" <cje@hevanet.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> >       For months, he's been running around saying "Iraq never had any
>>>>>> > connection to terrorist threats that endanger Americans !!!"
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       Now, he flip-flops 180 degrees and screams "These 370 tons of hi-X
>>>>>> > could fall into the hands of terrorists !!"
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >       John - I thought you just told us there are no terrorists in Iraq
>>>>>> > ????
>>>>>
>>>>>That is, of course, not what John Kerry said. Let's review- some terrorists
>>>>>blow up the World Trade Center. We go after them. We don't catch the
>>>>>important ones. Our commander-in-chief gets bored with the hunt and goes and
>>>>>attacks another country that didn't have anything to do with the WTC attack.
>>>>
>>>>And, once it's leader is gone, terrorists arrive.  But of course, the
>>>>liars in office don't want anyone to remember that part.
>>>>
>>>>>We kill a lot of their people and make them hate us worse than they hated
>>>>>their previous government. Many of them turn to terrorism where they hadn't
>>>>>before. In the confusion of the attack on the second, innocent country, a
>>>>>bunch of their explosives get "lost" and are probably in the hands of these
>>>>>new terrorists.
>>>>
>>>>Enough to blow up at least 6,000 airliners to be exact.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Glad I could straighten that out for you.
>>>>
>>>>It didn't. Republicans have no choice but to vote for Bush.  Those
>>>>that have been to one of his "rallies" had to sign an oath.  The
>>>>others just follow blindly.
>>>
>>>Among the 87 Dogpile hits I get on "republicans for kerry" are several
>>>organizations.  A Yahoo discussion group on the subject has almost 900
>>>subscribers.  The editor of "The American Conservative" endorsed
>>>Kerry.  dksopedia.com lists a number of other Republicans who have
>>>endorsed Kerry (appended below).  In this instance therefore I must
>>>politely disagree with the contention that Republicans have no choice
>>>but to vote for Bush.   
>>>
>>>Regarding the loyalty oath, should anyone feel bound to an oath sworn
>>>to a leader who has so flagrantly violated his own oath of office?
>>
>>True republicans have no choice.
>
> I've been a Republican since Reagan.  I voted for Badnarik.
>
I've been a Democrat since MCGovern, but I am voting for Badnarik also.

Actually I have always reqistered as a democrat, but I did vote for
Nixon over Hubird in 1968.


-- 
Wes Dukes (wdukes.pobox@com)  Swap the . and the @ to email me please.

spam@www.spam.com  is a garbage address.