🚀 go-pugleaf

On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 21:56:10 GMT, wdukes@fw.private.neotoma.org wrote:

>["Followup-To:" header set to triangle.general.]
>On 2004-11-01, Tom Disque <Tom.Disque@sas.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 16:33:06 -0400, Gary L. Burnore
>><gburnore@databasix.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 20:30:59 GMT, Gregorio.NC@gmail.com (Gregor)
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>Gary L. Burnore <gburnore@databasix.com>   wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 09:49:42 -0700, "Curt" <cje@hevanet.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >       For months, he's been running around saying "Iraq never had any
>>>>>>> > connection to terrorist threats that endanger Americans !!!"
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >       Now, he flip-flops 180 degrees and screams "These 370 tons of hi-X
>>>>>>> > could fall into the hands of terrorists !!"
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >       John - I thought you just told us there are no terrorists in Iraq
>>>>>>> > ????
>>>>>>
>>>>>>That is, of course, not what John Kerry said. Let's review- some terrorists
>>>>>>blow up the World Trade Center. We go after them. We don't catch the
>>>>>>important ones. Our commander-in-chief gets bored with the hunt and goes and
>>>>>>attacks another country that didn't have anything to do with the WTC attack.
>>>>>
>>>>>And, once it's leader is gone, terrorists arrive.  But of course, the
>>>>>liars in office don't want anyone to remember that part.
>>>>>
>>>>>>We kill a lot of their people and make them hate us worse than they hated
>>>>>>their previous government. Many of them turn to terrorism where they hadn't
>>>>>>before. In the confusion of the attack on the second, innocent country, a
>>>>>>bunch of their explosives get "lost" and are probably in the hands of these
>>>>>>new terrorists.
>>>>>
>>>>>Enough to blow up at least 6,000 airliners to be exact.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Glad I could straighten that out for you.
>>>>>
>>>>>It didn't. Republicans have no choice but to vote for Bush.  Those
>>>>>that have been to one of his "rallies" had to sign an oath.  The
>>>>>others just follow blindly.
>>>>
>>>>Among the 87 Dogpile hits I get on "republicans for kerry" are several
>>>>organizations.  A Yahoo discussion group on the subject has almost 900
>>>>subscribers.  The editor of "The American Conservative" endorsed
>>>>Kerry.  dksopedia.com lists a number of other Republicans who have
>>>>endorsed Kerry (appended below).  In this instance therefore I must
>>>>politely disagree with the contention that Republicans have no choice
>>>>but to vote for Bush.   
>>>>
>>>>Regarding the loyalty oath, should anyone feel bound to an oath sworn
>>>>to a leader who has so flagrantly violated his own oath of office?
>>>
>>>True republicans have no choice.
>>
>> I've been a Republican since Reagan.  I voted for Badnarik.
>>
>I've been a Democrat since MCGovern, but I am voting for Badnarik also.
>
>Actually I have always reqistered as a democrat, but I did vote for
>Nixon over Hubird in 1968.

Gee, that's pretty exciting, "Wes".