Article View: triangle.general
Article #937who says you're safer now than before Bush invaded Iraq?
From: Jane
Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2004 23:14
Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2004 23:14
113 lines
7083 bytes
7083 bytes
November 1, 2004
October Surprise
by Gordon Prather
http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=41189
To the dismay of the neo-crazies, the Iraqi puppet government has just
reported to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) that 195 metric
tons of HMX, 141 metric tons of RDX, and 5.8 metric tons of PETN have gone
missing.
Why report that to the IAEA? Because Iraq had imported or manufactured
all three of these high-explosives for use in their illicit nuke program
Hence, the Iraqi stocks had been subject to the IAEA Safeguards and Physical
Security regime ever since they were discovered at al-Qaqaa in 1991.
How long have they been missing?
The IAEA last checked the integrity of their seals in March 2003, just
days before Bush attacked Iraq. Bush has not allowed the IAEA back in Iraq
since.
Mohammed al-Sharaa, who headed, then and now, Iraq's Safeguarded site
monitoring department, says, "It is impossible that these materials could
have been taken from this site before the regime's fall."
An IAEA spokeswoman says that after hearing of the looting at the
principal Safeguarded site at Tuwaitha in April 2003, the IAEA formally
expressed concern "about the security of the [Safeguarded] high explosives
stored at al-Qaqaa."
But not to worry. One of the Pentagon neo-crazies - John A. Shaw, the
deputy undersecretary of defense for international technology security - has
just told Gullible Gertz at the Washington Times that he "believes" Russian
special forces, working with Iraqi intelligence, "almost certainly" took
custody of all those Safeguarded high-explosives and smuggled them out of
Iraq - to either Syria or Iran - just before Bush invaded.
Neither Shaw, nor Gertz, nor even John Kerry seems to have grasped the
import of Shaw's accusations.
A Bush administration weenie has just formally accused the Russians of
conspiring with the Iraqis, Iranians, and perhaps the Syrians to subvert the
IAEA Safeguards regime and to assist Iran or Syria acquire a nuke
capability, in flagrant violation of the Treaty on Non-Proliferation of
Nuclear Weapons!
Maybe it would help you to know what Shaw knows about HMX and RDX.
In a first-generation implosion-type nuke - like the Fat Man we
dropped on Nagasaki - a spherical sub-critical mass of fissile uranium is
surrounded by "shaped charges" of chemical high-explosives (HE). When
detonated, the HE shaped charges create a spherically-symmetric imploding
shock-wave, which compresses the 7-inch-diameter sub-critical sphere into a
teeny-tiny highly super-critical sphere. A fission chain reaction is then
initiated, which continues exponentially until enough fission energy is
produced to blow the supercritical mass apart.
Since half the nuclear yield comes from the last generation, the art
of the nuke designer is to compress the fissile material as much and as
quickly as possible and then to keep it supercritical for as long as
possible.
To do that, the nuke designer needs a special kind of HE that didn't
really exist in 1944. As a result, the Fat Man - which used conventional
explosives - had a low yield but weighed about 10,000 pounds. So, to get the
yield up and the weight down, U.S. nuke scientists began developing their
own high energy, but relatively insensitive, explosives.
By 1947, scientists at Los Alamos had created RDX, the first
plastic-bonded explosive. Soon afterwards, scientists at Lawrence Livermore
developed the even more energetic HMX. Most of the nukes in our stockpile
today utilize RDX and HMX plastic-bonded explosives.
So, the HMX and RDX the IAEA found at al-Qaqaa was for Iraqi nukes.
They had built an RDX production plant at al-Qaqaa. It was destroyed in the
Gulf War and never rebuilt.
However, the Iraqis were unable to produce significant quantities of
fissile uranium, so the HMX and RDX stocks were never needed.
But RDX and HMX can be used for other purposes, such as mining,
tunneling, or demolition. Hence, the Iraqis were allowed to keep their
stocks of HMX and RDX - safeguarded by the IAEA - until they could come up
with plans for using their stocks peacefully.
Until now, the pre-election brouhaha has focused on the possible use
in Iraq of those "missing" hundreds of tons of "conventional"
high-explosives.
But in the extremely unlikely event that Shaw is not crazy, it might
be a good idea for Kerry to bring up the nuke programs the neo-crazies
allege Iran and North Korea have jump-started because Bush invaded Iraq.
Iraq had RDX and HMX for nukes, but no fissile material. But both Iran
and North Korea have - or soon could have - fissile material for nukes, but
no RDX or HMX.
So, who says you're safer now than before Bush invaded Iraq?
Physicist James Gordon Prather has served as a policy implementing
official for national security-related technical matters in the Federal
Energy Agency, the Energy Research and Development Administration, the
Department of Energy, the Office of the Secretary of Defense and the
Department of the Army. Dr. Prather also served as legislative assistant for
national security affairs to U.S. Sen. Henry Bellmon, R-Okla. -- ranking
member of the Senate Budget Committee and member of the Senate Energy
Committee and Appropriations Committee. Dr. Prather had earlier worked as a
nuclear weapons physicist at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in
California and Sandia National Laboratory in New Mexico.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<jxUhd.2058$BU6.1867@trnddc05>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!news-feed01.roc.ny.frontiernet.net!nntp.frontiernet.net!nntp.giganews.com.MISMATCH!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!cyclone1.gnilink.net!spamkiller.gnilink.net!gnilink.net!trnddc05.POSTED!c9dfc86f!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 101acf,b3fd728771ce4eb5,start X-Google-Thread: 108a25,b3fd728771ce4eb5,start X-Google-Thread: 106d8d,b3fd728771ce4eb5,start X-Google-Thread: 104eff,b3fd728771ce4eb5,start X-Google-Thread: 111a85,b3fd728771ce4eb5,start X-Google-Attributes: gid101acf,gid108a25,gid106d8d,gid104eff,gid111a85,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!news-feed01.roc.ny.frontiernet.net!nntp.frontiernet.net!nntp.giganews.com.MISMATCH!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!cyclone1.gnilink.net!spamkiller.gnilink.net!gnilink.net!trnddc05.POSTED!c9dfc86f!not-for-mail From: "Jane" <jane4536@hotmail.com> Newsgroups: triangle.general,triangle.politics,seattle.politics,ca.politics,or.politics Subject: who says you're safer now than before Bush invaded Iraq? Lines: 116 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original Message-ID: <jxUhd.2058$BU6.1867@trnddc05> Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2004 23:14:23 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 4.15.36.162 X-Complaints-To: abuse@verizon.net X-Trace: trnddc05 1099437263 4.15.36.162 (Tue, 02 Nov 2004 18:14:23 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2004 18:14:23 EST