Is Harriet Miers scared she might perjure herself, is why she refuses to testify under oath? DISCRIMINATION!

Thread View: triangle.general

2 messages

[T] Back to Threads [V] Tree View [G] Group Articles

2 total messages Started by i_tell_it_like_it_is_3 Tue, 20 Mar 2007 21:29

#1037

Author: i_tell_it_like_it_is_3
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 21:29

18 lines
2561 bytes

Yeah, it just does not wash.  What is she afraid of?  What skeletons
are in HER closet?  And Karl Rove does not want to testify under oath
either.

Wow!  I thought the Bush administration was so big on everything being
on the up and up....  Let's see....Gonzales is in trouble because of
firing those 8 prosecutors for political reasons.  Bush said he does
not agree with the way that Gonzales did it, but that he agrees that
the President should be able to fire prosecutors as the EWOC sees
fit.  And then there is the little 'thingy' (thanks for the word
former Pres George HW Bush) facing the FBI just now because of the
wiretap situation.  It seems that their aim was too broad, and that
they ended up getting records from the phone companies that they had
NO reason getting.  And the phone companies just rolled over for
them.  Makes me wonder if Dick Cheney has stock in his 'blind trust'
in those companies, as well as that Halliburton stock that is still
delivering strong for "Uncle Dick".  I guess it IS true that Uncle
Dick is the dog what wags the tail known as EWOC Bush!

Re: Is Harriet Miers scared she might perjure herself, is why she refuses to testify under oath? DISCRIMINATION!

#1038

Author: Larry
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 00:03

27 lines
2757 bytes

In article <1174426178.408333.77030@l75g2000hse.googlegroups.com>,
 i_tell_it_like_it_is_3@yahoo.com wrote:

> Yeah, it just does not wash.  What is she afraid of?  What skeletons
> are in HER closet?  And Karl Rove does not want to testify under oath
> either.

Umm, if they were afraid of perjury, they could just lie!

It's a longstanding tradition for when executive branch officials 
testify about something within the domain of the executive branch.  The 
same thing happened under Clinton.

> Wow!  I thought the Bush administration was so big on everything being
> on the up and up....  Let's see....Gonzales is in trouble because of
> firing those 8 prosecutors for political reasons.  Bush said he does
> not agree with the way that Gonzales did it, but that he agrees that
> the President should be able to fire prosecutors as the EWOC sees
> fit.  And then there is the little 'thingy' (thanks for the word
> former Pres George HW Bush) facing the FBI just now because of the
> wiretap situation.  It seems that their aim was too broad, and that
> they ended up getting records from the phone companies that they had
> NO reason getting.  And the phone companies just rolled over for
> them.  Makes me wonder if Dick Cheney has stock in his 'blind trust'
> in those companies, as well as that Halliburton stock that is still
> delivering strong for "Uncle Dick".  I guess it IS true that Uncle
> Dick is the dog what wags the tail known as EWOC Bush!

Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads