🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <3ss1p0$7oc@ccnet.ccnet.com>, <irishboy@ccnet.com> writes:
> Path: 
news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net!news-m01.ny.us.ibm.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!philabs!uunet!
in1.uu.net!europa.chnt.gtegsc.com!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!ccnet.com!usenet
> From: irishboy@ccnet.com (Mairhtin O'Feannag)
> Newsgroups: 
alt.sex.fetish.feet,alt.sex,alt.sex.motss,alt.sex.pictures.d,alt.sex.pictures.m
ale,alt.sex.homosexual,alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.d,alt.binaries.pictures.er
otica.teen,alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.teen.male,soc.motss,ba.motss,pa.motss,
triangle.motss,pnw.motss
> Subject: Re: Fags == Birth Defects
> Date: Tue, 27 Jun 95 14:01:02 GMT
> Organization: CCnet Communications (510-988-7140 guest)
> Lines: 46
> Message-ID: <3ss1p0$7oc@ccnet.ccnet.com>
> References: <3spnva$rim@news.xmission.com>
> NNTP-Posting-Host: h97-118.ccnet.com
> X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #3
> Xref: news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net alt.sex.fetish.feet:9576 alt.sex:79080 
alt.sex.motss:17254 alt.sex.pictures.d:1475 alt.sex.pictures.male:10383 
alt.sex.homosexual:7745 alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.d:16102 
alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.teen:10715 
alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.teen.male:676 soc.motss:77340 ba.motss:5096 
pa.motss:374 triangle.motss:556 pnw.motss:1013
> 
> In article <3spnva$rim@news.xmission.com>, maguba@xmission.xmission.com 
(maguba) wrote:
> ==>Fags are obviously birth defects.  The ingredients were mixed wrong and 
the
> ==>thing came out of the oven a twisted imitation of what it should have 
been.
> ==>
> ==>Why do fags expect to be treated with any dignity?  Sexuality is a basic
> ==>aspect of life, and these mutants have a tasteless and misguided 
sexuality.
> ==>This casts doubt on their entire essence.
> ==>
> ==>If we were talking about a superficial birth defect, like a deformed
> ==>foot or something, it would be a whole different matter.  But sex is as
> ==>fundamental as eating and drinking.
> ==>
> ==>What would you think of a man who ate dog turds for every meal?  Would you
> ==>buy his line that he should be treated equally because he is similar to 
you
> ==>in other ways besides eating shit?  Would you associate with him as long 
as
> ==>he agreed to eat his filthy shit in the privacy of his own kitchen so 
nobody
> ==>had to watch?
> ==>
> ==>No, you'd realize that anybody who eats shit is fucked up on a basic,
> ==>primary level.  You wouldn't associate with him or trust his judgement in
> ==>ANY case, given that he is so obviously sick in an area as fundamental as
> ==>eating.
> ==>
> ==>With such a serious flaw at the very core of their nature, there's no 
point
> ==>to faggot's lives.  They are a waste of resources.  Fags should:
> ==>
> ==>  1) turn over all their assets to charity
> ==>     for the Prevention of Birth Defects
> ==>
> ==>  2) go in a corner and kill themselves
> ==>
> 
> 
> This from a straight man, downloading pictures of little girls.  Hmmm....  
What would you say to the 
> comment that you are a little girl mollester, and aught to be strung up by 
your gonads for your 
> obvious perversion?  Hmmmmm?   There are laws against what you do, but 
thankfully, the laws against 
> being gay/lesbian/bisexual/transgendered are being found to be 
unconstitutional.  Your perversion is 
> not protected by the constitution.  When you are arrested and tried for 
mollesting little girls, you 
> will go to prison and be beaten senseless (but you are already senseless, 
that is obvious) by the 
> fathers and brothers of girls who have been subjected to your filth.  You 
will deserve every little 
> bit of punishment you receive.
> 
> Then you will have to face God and explain how you could foster and promote 
such hate against His 
> children (after all, God made me gay by His grace and will..and I celebrate 
the fact that he chose 
> me to be special) and yet were a perverted little girl mollester.  I will 
pray for you.  You need 
> the help.
>