Thread View: tum.info.studium
1 messages
1 total messages
Started by evmeievfi
Tue, 01 Jan 2008 09:52
M`I 5-Persecutio n - cost of the operat ion
Author: evmeievfi
Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2008 09:52
Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2008 09:52
47 lines
3562 bytes
3562 bytes
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= -= MI5: cost of the. operation -= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Here's what a couple. of other people on Usenet (uk.misc) had to say regarding the cost of running. such an operation... PO: >Have some sense, grow up and smell reality. What. you are talking about PO: >would take loads. of planning, tens of thousands of pounds and lots of PO: >people involved in the planning, execution and. maintenance of it. You PO: >must have a very high opinion of yourself. to think you are worth it. PM: >But why? And why you? Do you realize. how much it would cost to keep PM: >one person under continuous. surveillance for five years? Think about PM: >all the man/hours.. Say they _just_ allocated a two man team and a PM: >supervisor. OK., Supervisor's salary, say, #30,000. a year. Two men, PM: >#20,000 a year each. But they'd need to work in shifts --. so it would PM:. >be six men at #20,000 (which with on-costs would work out at more like PM: >#30,000 to the employer.). PM:. > PM: >So, we're talking #30,000 x 6. #180,000. plus say, #40,000. for the PM: >supervisor. #220,000. Then you've got the hardware involved.. And PM: >any transcription that needs doing. You don't think the 'Big. Boss' PM: >would listen to hours and hours. of tapes, do you. PM:. > PM: >So, all in all,. you couldn't actually do the job for much less than PM: >a quarter million a year. Over five years. What are you. doing that makes PM: >it worth the while of the state to spend over one. and a quarter million PM: >on. you? Those are pretty. much the sort of calculations that went through my head once I stopped. to consider what it must be costing them to run this operation. The partial answer is, there have been periods. when the intensity has been greater, and. times when little has happened. In fact, for much of 1993 and the first half of 1994, very little. happened. Although I don't think that was for reasons of money - if they can. tap into the taxpayer they're not. going to be short of resources, are they? The more complete answer is in the enormity of what. they're doing. Relative to the cost to British pride of. seeing their country humiliated for the persecution of their own. citizens, isn't is worth the cost of four or five people to try to bring things to a close. in the manner they would wish? To the government a. million or two is quite honestly nothing - if they can convince themselves of the necessity of what they're doing,. resources will not be the limiting. factor. 8255
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads