🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: tw.bbs.comp.386bsd
Article #2

Why CPU utilization for W2K using snmpget is different from task monitor ?

#2
From: andy wong
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2004 03:12
5 lines
1213 bytes
Does any know the correct OID to get CPU for W2k using SNMP?
I used the .1.3.6.2.1.25.3.3.1.2.1 is this correct.
This seems to use the MIB-2. but when I check again the CPU usage from
the task monitor. Both seems to say different value.
Does any know why ?
Technical Details
Message-ID: <f8b67f15.0408311912.2651c53c@posting.google.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews2.google.com!not-for-mail

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 1079af,8f0868ce9e0e7cc8,start
X-Google-Thread: 10f2ac,8f0868ce9e0e7cc8,start
X-Google-Thread: 1130dd,8f0868ce9e0e7cc8,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid1079af,gid10f2ac,gid1130dd,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews2.google.com!not-for-mail
From: fp_andywong@lycos.com (andy wong)
Newsgroups: tw.bbs.comp.386bsd,comp.dcom.net-management,cn.bbs.comp.unix.bsd
Subject: Why CPU utilization for W2K using snmpget is different from task monitor ?
Date: 31 Aug 2004 20:12:49 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 5
Message-ID: <f8b67f15.0408311912.2651c53c@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 202.128.225.47
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1094008369 11365 127.0.0.1 (1 Sep 2004 03:12:49 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2004 03:12:49 +0000 (UTC)