Article View: tx.general
Article #103Re: Texas State Election Laws (was: Ross Perot for President Information
From: Eric C Virro
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1992 17:44
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1992 17:44
50 lines
2725 bytes
2725 bytes
In article <6388@lib.tmc.edu> jmaynard@oac.hsc.uth.tmc.edu (Jay Maynard) writes: >In article <0ZLE9Z@taronga.com> peter@taronga.com (Peter da Silva) writes: >>In article <kupeakINNpuf@earth.cs.utexas.edu> varvel@cs.utexas.edu (Donald A. Varvel) writes: >>>You are allowed to vote for only one person, and >>>only in one party's primary. >>Why? > >Ever hear of one man, one vote? Only in the case were a particular organization decides your share is equal to everybody else's. Shareholder votes are one vote per share. The Republican and Democratic parties are _not_ agencies of the United States government, much as they would like to be. There is absolutely no reason that the United States (or state or local) governments should be in any way involved in the administration of internal decision making procedures of these organizations, nor should any governmental funds be spent in any matter related to this. >>>Being able to sign petitions after >>>either voting in the primary or signing another petition would >>>allow one person two stabs at putting a name on the ballot. >>What's wrong with that? > >Because it goves someone more than one vote. Why should the government have any law enforcing the rules of a private organization? The primaries are merely internal decision making attempts of a party to make a popular choice. If one man, one vote was the right thing, why is no outrage expressed over states which have caucuses? I am not bound to vote for the primary candidate of my choice, and now that he has dropped out of the race (and has sadly declined to reenter), I could not, even if I wanted too. I think I should be able to support (and sign the petition of) anyone else. All signing a petition means is that I would like to see this candidate on the final, real, election in November. I would very much like to see H. Ross Perot on the ballot on November because I think he would add a lot to the debate and keep Bush and Clinton honest. But the option of supporting the candidacy of the person of my choice has been denied. I think that is wrong and undemocratic. -ericv -- Eric Virro - ericv@owlnet.rice.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Apr16.174425.17809@rice.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!news.dell.com!natinst.com!cs.utexas.edu!menudo.uh.edu!rice!ericvReferences:
<kupeakINNpuf@earth.cs.utexas.edu> <0ZLE9Z@taronga.com> <6388@lib.tmc.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!news.dell.com!natinst.com!cs.utexas.edu!menudo.uh.edu!rice!ericv From: ericv@owlnet.rice.edu (Eric C Virro) Newsgroups: tx.general Subject: Re: Texas State Election Laws (was: Ross Perot for President Information Message-ID: <1992Apr16.174425.17809@rice.edu> Date: 16 Apr 92 17:44:25 GMT References: <kupeakINNpuf@earth.cs.utexas.edu> <0ZLE9Z@taronga.com> <6388@lib.tmc.edu> Sender: news@rice.edu (News) Distribution: tx Organization: Rice University Lines: 50