🚀 go-pugleaf

"The other Donald" <the_donald_13@yeehaw2.com> wrote in message news:<6Cvmd.39290$SS3.29525@fe2.texas.rr.com>...
> "J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:9c2d0f9a.0411160621.1e1b4e52@posting.google.com...
> > "The other Donald" <the_donald_13@yeehaw2.com> wrote in message
>  news:<CR2md.25554$Zr3.7884@fe1.texas.rr.com>...
> > >
> > > I don't get it with that dumbass.
> > >
> > > You made some statements regarding Mexico and their lack of 'tolerance'
>  for
> > > transporting nukes through their country.
> > >
> > > That ignorant moron claimed you said the polar-fucking-opposite!
> > >
> > > What is it with those idiots?
> >
> > Jackass, what I said was that there are no nukes, period. Show me
> > where I mentioned or even implied that I was referring to Mexico's
> > position on the subject. [ you can't; that's why you have zero
> > credibility ]
> 
> I have plenty of credibility, you stupid fuck.
> 
> Try to remember from one day to the next what stupid shit you say:
> 
> Your words: "We're supposed to believe that some sand-monkey hiding in a
> cave can acquire one? You've been hitting that moonshine too much Bill."
> 
> Now, fucktard.....please show the class where Bill said anything that even
> resembled your ignorant mouth-fart. Show us where Bill claimed that anyone
> had a nuke. Please, you stupid fucking bigot, show where Bill says anything
> that even remotely resembles "Saddam," "sand-monkey," "caves," or
> "al-Qaeda."
> 
> Here's your free pass to wallow in your own stupidity....Bill Walker's post
> at issue, the one you replied to, saying Bill was hitting the 'moonshine':
> 
> >   For the most part, I agree with your post.. I'll deviate just a bit..
> > The country of Mexico is not a hospitable environment for the transport
> > of nuclear materials.. In fact, that material would have to be smuggled
> > into the country by extraordinary means..
> >
> >   I've spent a great deal of time in that country.. I have family deep
> > in Mexico in several of it's states.. Drug smuggling and latinos
> > crossing the border is another issue, entirely.. Drug smuggling is
> > increasingly difficult and the main highways, almost non-existent.. The
> > difference is that drugs and people are much different than arms and
> > nuclear material.. They do not have the support of the ordinary Mexican
> > people.. In fact, there would be much opposition to the transport of
> > those materials..
> >
> >   Do not be mistaken about the border issues that've been raised in this
> > camaign.. Indirectly Karl Rove and his henchmen fired up the Border
> > security issue as another smoke and mirrors strategy to disguise Bush's
> > own failures..
> >
> >   We've heard much about anecdotal horror stories that were designed to
> > fire up the Bush support in states like Arizona and New Mexico.. Border
> > areas in California and Texas also were flooded with the same stories..
> >
> >   Let me assure you that our good neighbors to the south, are the best
> > assets we have, to protect us from the terrorists threats in the
> > southern regions of our country.. Trust me.. they exercise no tolerance
> > policies for weapons and nuclear material, for their own safety.. Don't
> > be misled into yet another area that is fueled by Karl Rove and Bush
> > supporters..
> 
> And your free clue: it's not in there because he didn't say it, you stupid
> fuck.
> 
> GodDAMN you're an idiot. Or were you just answering questions with random
> uses of your low-rent, Klan-inspired vernacular?


Thankyou for reminding everyone what a vulgar pig you are with your
effeminate rantings. Now that you've finished I ask:
Jackass, what I said was that there are no nukes, period. Show me
where I mentioned or even implied that I was referring to Mexico's
position on the subject. [ you can't; that's why you have zero
credibility ]
You did, in your profanity laced diatribe, mention alot of what Bill
said on the subject.