🚀 go-pugleaf

"Long Ranger" wrote in message
...
> > PS: Is your sig: "Long Ranger" a play on words or a misgnomer for
"The
> > Lone Ranger" ..? A question - not a criticism...
> >
> > JHbs
>
> None of what you have quoted here is from my postings. The "Long
Ranger'
> moniker refers to my interest in long range shooting.
> Long Ranger
>

Well, there is one response in this thread attributed in my name that is
not mine; and there are two by you that appear indented beneath a post
of mine that do not contain or address anything by me... But I cannot
tell whom you directed it to as you snipped the author and most of the
text... If there is an attribution error, I apologize. As I left the
text of what I responded to - please consider that my posting addresses
that...

==============
> P.S. It's good to know you are the authority on what is "too deep" for
our
> discussion her. I'm sure most of us aspire to your exalted
level............

This is funny... I think you have "selectively" snipped here; a very
common practice; especially by those waiting to "take offense" because
they think an insult advances an arguement ... And "most of us..." got a
mouse in your pocket...?

I said both broad and deep - and accompanied it  ...

> The issues raised here are much too broad and deep for newsgroups.
These
> deserve the personal responsibility of finding and reading "both
sides"
> of history before deciding where to stand on issues. The information
was
> always available, but required much interest, time and effort. You now
> have the Internet, making information more easily available, but this
> also requires verification of sources.

Do you really want to sidetrack into the details of "teaching without
bias, objective vs subjective, "regional instruction," local news
viewpoints, definition and description of problems, etc. Do you think
... Oh, never mind...

JHbs