🚀 go-pugleaf

arminius wrote:
> "Don Gabacho" <jpastore@nettaxi.com> wrote in message
> news:1116094162.741681.18370@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> 
>>Nickelodeon show on Alamo angers Texans
>>Big News Network
>>Tuesday 10th May, 2005  (UPI)
>>
>>
>>San Antonio residents are upset about a children's cable show that said
>>the Battle of the Alamo was fought so white farmers could keep their
>>slaves.
>>
>>The 50-second piece on Nickelodeon's My Back Yard showed a San Antonio
>>teenager who said the conflict over slavery between white farmers and
>>the Mexican government, which had abolished slaver, led up to the
>>famous 1836 battle.
>>
>>In a city where those killed in the historic battle are viewed as
>>heroes, some find the claims untenable, WOAI-AM, San Antonio, reported
>>Tuesday.
>>
>>I think it's a shame that anybody would take that approach, said Alamo
>>Director David Stewart, adding it was an insult to the Mexicans ... who
>>fought for freedom and liberty in the Alamo.
>>
>>A senior producer for Nickelodeon's Nick News said the piece was not
>>meant to convey the whole story of the battle.
>>
>>We recognize that there were several key issues in the Battle of the
>>Alamo and one of them was slavery, said Mark Lyons.
>>
> 
> Where do these anti-White public officals get this pseudo-historic bullshit?
> 
> Hank
> 
> http://www.natall.com/   National Alliance
> 
> 
 From sources like:

http://www.tuppenceworth.ie/Politics/Alamo.html
http://hnn.us/articles/4750.html
http://www.pinzler.com/ushistory/timeline5.html
http://college.hmco.com/history/readerscomp/rcah/html/ah_001900_alamo.htm
http://news.scotsman.com/international.cfm?id=1045572004

Any questions?

James