🚀 go-pugleaf

"Frank Matthews" <MATTHEWS@MATH.CL.UH.EDU> wrote in message
news:3D6661D6.3000006@MATH.CL.UH.EDU...
> We could have fun on an IQ/education match.  However, your analysis of
> the relative strengths of the administrations especially at the top is
> dead wrong.
>
> Bush is a dim wit who, without affirmative action for well connected
> rich kids, would have had a hard time competing and barely made it with
> all the help.

You left out the fact that he wasted taxpayers money when he went to flight
school, and would have been courts martialed for AWOL if he were a regular
guy with his daddy.


Clinton, while being helped by an engaging personality,
> would never have made it out of Hope without being smart.
>
> As to the others in the current cess pool -- Cheesy is just a simple
> trickster sharp but not smart.  Powell is a clear beneficiary of the
> military's affirmative action plan but pretty smart.  Just not smart
> enough to avoid getting trapped with his associates.  O'Neil can't
> manage to open his mouth without inserting his foot.  It goes on & on.
>
> Frank Matthews
>
> Mike Smith wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 23 Aug 2002 00:51:54 GMT, Frank Matthews
> > <MATTHEWS@MATH.CL.UH.EDU> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>You aren't trying to say that our Affirmative Action pretty dim pres &
> >>buddies are smarter that the last folks are you.
> >>
> >>That would be really silly.
> >>
> >>Frank Matthews
> >>
> >
> > Nope, what I'm stating is that President Bush is WAY ABOVE the
> > intelligence level of the previous administration. The previous
> > administration had tons of imbeciles and book-smart, life-stupid
> > losers in positions of power. We have real people with real
> > intelligence in charge, now.
> >
> > Based on your post, you're pretty stupid yourself, so I doubt that you
> > will be able to comprehend my statement, so I kept it as simple as
> > possible to give you a slight chance of understanding it.
> >
> > Mike Smith
> >
> >
> >>Mike Smith wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>On Thu, 22 Aug 2002 17:36:28 GMT, montep@email.com (Monte) wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>http://www.nytimes.com/2002/08/22/international/asia/22STAN.html
> >>>>
> >>>>The story needs no introduction, it is EXACTLY what our Pres.by
> >>>>Committee and its paranoid Atty General are trying to accomplish here.
> >>>>
> >>>>Monte
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>Can you get any dumber, Monte? Just because the previous
> >>>administration was dumb as dirt, doesn't mean every administration is
> >>>stupid. You gleefully have yourself deluded into thinking our
> >>>President is like the previous one. He does not use focus groups to
> >>>determine what his policies will be.
> >>>
> >>>What a dumbass {monte}. Here's a free clue. The NYT lies.
> >>>
> >>>Mike Smith
> >>>
> >>>
> >
>